Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 22:03
IN A SUIT FOR INJUCTION PLAINTIFF DIES,WHETHER LEGAL HEIRS HAVE CAUSE OF ACTION.WHETHER PLAINTIFF'S LEGAL HEIRS CAN BE BROUGHT ON RECORD.
Sumir
06 April 2011 at 20:53
Is it true that as per above act, the govt officers has to be transferred every 3 or 6 yrs
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 20:19
1) contract (right of third parties)act, 1999 has been repealed or not & if repealed then it has been merged in the indian contract act, 1872. i think it is applicable.
2) can anyone explain me the appenda certificate is what ?
only 2 questions to answer pls provide me the answer.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 20:17
we have made a sell agreement in 2006 of agri land.at that time this propery was mortgage in bank.seller was not fulfill this amount to the bank.bank has got auction of this land.buyer has paid some amount and clear loan amount on behalf of seller.
can sale agreement become void?
give remedy for title clearance.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 20:15
It has been said by a writter Prof. Manohar R. Wadhwani (Book Known as Business Law) P No. 60
1)In case of fraud u can sue in tort for damages .
2)In case of misrepresentation u cannot sue for damages.
3) u can sue for resitution but in fraud u cannot sue for resitution.
the above are not said in the indian contract act, 1872 (but it can be the nterpreation of the law) so any case i can hve for the above mentioned.
also can we say that damage & resitution are one & the same or hand in hand becasue the defination of resitution says - payment or services that you provide someone because u have done something bad, wrong or illegal to them .
so can anybody help me out to solve the above problem .
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 20:06
the documents which we have sought form the RTI are called as a primary evidence as per the indian evidence act, 1872 because it is a public document ihave heard that every public documents are primary evidence ? & to present that document in the court do exhibit process is necessary because my colleague say that exhibit & notary is not required to the RTI documents which we have sought that can be directly present to the court or tribunal. becasue it is a primary evidence . becasue my ADVOCATE SAYS THAT THE ABOVE MENTIONED INFORMATION IS NOT CORRECT WE HAVE TO exhibit the documents though it is a public document & notary is not required. ?
p santosh kumar
06 April 2011 at 18:40
padmasali is OBC in andhra pradesh , suppose that persons grand father and father settled at orissa, but in orissa there is no caste as padmasali .under what category that person can get caste certificate at orissa
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 16:13
My father met with an accident and was in coma for 3yrs,in dec,2008 he passed away with no will. We were always a nuclear family (2 daughters) & got no support from my dad's family. my mother had applied for a successon certificate but the court also wants my grandmother to testify, but she would put an objection. she is financialy independant and owns a house in U.P.
Please advise if there is a way to contest the court's decision regarding my grandmother's NOC.
This was my question before to which the experts answered that "Yes, my grandmother is entitled to a share"
Thankyou for your precious advice.
My grandmother has always been independant.As she used to live in UP and we usd to live in delhi. She has got an independant house on her name as well as a lot of cash in the form of FDR's. My Uncle(her eldest son)is an engineer and also both my cousins are employed as engineers in reptued companies.The succesion certificate was applied by my mother to acess the money in my father's saving and current a/cs.
My question now is that:
1) Can we contest our Grandmother's share in court?
If yes, then how and if no, then please tell a way through wich we can minimise her share?
2) Can we claim for maintence? As my father was the only earning member and all the money my mother had went into his treatment.I am married and my younger sister is hearing impaired and is totally dependent on my mother. This is the only money we are left with for which we have been fighting for the past 8 yrs.
3)Can we also claim a share in her property and all the cash she has in the form of FDR's under her name in the bank? As she does'nt want us to have anything and wants to give everything she has to my tauji.
4)As I am married can my husband also claim a share in my fathr's assets?And will it be a seperate share from my mother's and mine?
5)We (both daughters) have signed the NOC, now if my Granny objects and inists on her share, what will the proportion in which the money will be divided?(will she get one-fourth or half?)
I desperatly need an experts opinion and please answer to the qustions in order as I find it quite difficult to understand.
Hoping to get a positive answer.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 16:12
dear sir,
i am shalini my native place is Chennai. i am basically Hindu family. Actually we have one house in Chennai we are living this home only. This home is my grand father own home. but now he is expired. My grandfather has a two children first one is my father second my aunty . This house is still now in my grand father home. my aunty is married she have a three child. now my aunty is doing own business in my grandfather home for past 10 years for that she is not give any rent. But now she is asking equal share in our home. but 15 years back my grandfather and grand mother gave one land to my aunty for our future life that time she was married . but now my grand mother is alive she is giving full support to my aunty . now my aunty is living this land only. But now she is telling that particular land purchased from my grandmother by cash. for that my aunty gave some amount to my grand mother like that. but it is totally lie. she make some duplicate document for that land. but we don’t have a any proof for my aunty property that time my grandmother gave property by oral.
My question is
my aunty wil get any share from our grand father property,?
Alredy we gave a property to her ? We want to prove it? how
my father will put a case to my aunty home any possible is there?
Then if she put a case how many days it will take a time to solve ?
please kindly reply me
we are totally confused.
Thank u
ABATEMENT OF SUIT
IN ACIVIL SUIT PLAINTIFF DIES, AFTER 90 DAYS PLAINTIFF'S LEGAL HEIRS FILED APPLICATION FOR LEGAL HEIRS BROUGHT ON RECORD UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 3 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. WITHOUT FILING APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE ABETMENT CAN BE ALLOWED.