Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 20:54
For cases in Tribunals which follow Natural Justice and are not bound by CPC, is it essential for applicant to file Affidavit along with Pleadings?
Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 20:16
Mandatory injunction/status quo is passed by lower court.
No appeal lies at HC.
But preferring to challenge the Order by
Writ 227 at HC.
Want to know under which sections in addition to cpc 151, one may apply for 'stay of execution' of Order.
Will Order 41 rule 5 (substantial loss etc) also applicable to writs under227, to get the stay of Order.
Please advise.
Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 19:26
When we called a member judicial member?
The answer was When any member appointed from the Judicial service (retired Judge or in service) is called a judicial member. So what does the judicial service here means? We can say that any Judge under the law who is now retired but appoint under any tribunal or any quasi-judicial service are known as a judicial member. So here the word retired is compulsory should be there. If the person has got a promotion form one level to another higher level under any quasi-judicial service than he is not a judicial member. Because he was not a judge & he is not retired from the judging work forms any court & not re-appointed under the quasi-judicial service.
Simply pls elaborate the term judicial service means & judicial member means.
vishesh kumar
26 April 2011 at 19:19
The east punjab urban rent restriction act1949
petitioner has require premise for his son
respodent take defence that son has not come in the wittness box to show his necessity
and show some judgement in which son not came in the wittnes box and the petition was dissmissed
kindly give me any judgement to rebut this fact that even son has not come in the wittness box even then petition is maintaiable.
vishesh kumar
26 April 2011 at 19:01
if the defence has been stuck off. whether i have right to argue the case.
opposite council object on my appearance.if you have any judgement show me citation please.
vishesh kumar
26 April 2011 at 18:51
whether arbitrator can review its own order?
if no then please have any judgement?
Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 18:47
whether a property owned by a son from his father under a Will is to be considered as self acquired proeprty?
Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 18:33
Sir,
A person has obtained an ad interim order from Junior Civil Judge, against the municipal corporation for demolishing an unauthorized structure, by concealing the fact in thier OS that the case is already pending in the high court and a contempt case was also pending in the high court.
Pointing this discrepancy that the party has concealed the fact that the case is pending in the high court the standing counsel got the order impunged.
The party agrieved by the orders of the Junior Civil Court approached the Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, and obtained a status quo.
In the hearing the standing counsel of the corporation has stated, as there is a contempt case pending against the corporation and wherein the corporation has given it in writting in their counter affadavit in the contempt case before the Hon. High Court Judge, that "as the regularizastion was rejected and as the party has not stopped the construction eventhough they were issued notices, and also ignored the 'stay of construction ordered' by the Hon. High Court, they would demolish the illegal structure immedieately. He has pleaded before the Addl. chief judge to vacate the status quo so that the corporation could demolish the unauthorized structure and he further prayed that the OS could be heard after the status quo has been vacated.
Is the argument of the standing counsel valid. If the status quo is vacated the corporation would demolish the unauthorized structure and the parties plea not to demolish in the OS does not serve any purpose.
Anonymous
26 April 2011 at 18:23
Dear Experts of the forum,
In the instant case attorney of a P O A executed a sale deed after death of the owner of the land and that to after a lapse of 7 years.
Now the case in a Civil Court for a partition ( Between Brother & Sister ). Defendant ( Brother ) knows this fact. What should plaintiff do in this case?
Thanking you All in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rejection of plaint under order Vii; Rule 11(d)
Respected sir/Madame
my client was inducted into possession of an unclaimed land "Anatheenam" by representqation as if the land belong to plaintiff. but prior to that plaintiff himself has applied for lease of the very same land to government admitting that it is an unclaimed land. smelling the very factum of plaintiff's nil title to the said anatheenam land. my client stopped paying rent to the said property. now plaintiff has file a suit for ejectment of my client based on a rental agreement ( license Agreement is the name given in agreement) the said agreement was entered by plaintiff without title to suit property. whether the suit is maintainable to enforce the said contract of rent (licence agreement) in the light of section 17 of specific releif act and section 23 of Indian contract act.