Anonymous
15 May 2011 at 17:38
property is on the name of my grand father who has died 11 years before & as per the will written by him it should be transferred to my brother's name can u please tell me the procedure to transfer title.
sarfaraz
15 May 2011 at 12:12
i have filed case for custody of my daughter but during this case i have filed visitation of my daughter and case is on hearing for visitation. please let me know that can i get visitation of my daughter? i have filed for weekly visitation. my wife has filed case for CRPC125. but my aim is to get visitation of my daughter. will i win the visitation case?
Anonymous
15 May 2011 at 11:42
After Passing the LLB 3rd year there is a compulsory artilceship under the practising advocate for 6 months so they are known as a Registered Clerks or some other are known as a Registered Clerks for
THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT (ORIGINAL SIDE) RULES
PART - I
Advocates And Registered Clerks
thank
suryagaurav
15 May 2011 at 09:08
There is a consumer case filed against my concern in which I was earlier a manager.
In that case applicant prayed for his disputed amount. (that is fine as it is his right).
But in his application he write about me that I have abused him and threatened him , and sent Police personnel to him many times(all things are totally incorrect and without any proof /evidence, and without any relevancy to the case).
Can I have any legal remedy, like compensation for defamation, available.
what is the process to initiate cases under civil and criminal laws.
pls guide.
Anonymous
15 May 2011 at 04:22
OPINION Required in Depth
If Possible With the Relevant Case Laws of SC Only.
1) SEZ (Special Economic Zone) Act cannot be changed by the Finance Act.
2) Invoking the theory of promissory estoppel according to which if a promise is made by the government in the shape of a notification or declaration and if the financial commitment is made I pursuance of the promise, there is no way in which the government can back out from the promise. So we can say that promissory estoppel is applicable to any branch of government or any state government & also to the central government.
3) The SEZ Act was made by the Commerce Ministry & not by the Finance Ministry so the finance ministry can’t change or amend any act which was passed by the commerce ministry. Is there any provision under Constitution Of India, 1949.
Thanks
Anonymous
14 May 2011 at 19:04
Dear Experts of the LCI,
In a land acquisition case, R&B department ( A P State) had finalised compensation but referred the case to a CIVIL Court ( U/s 30 of L.A.Act, 1894) for taking decision in regards to a Protected Tenant, Inam finalisation and Urban land ceiling , in the year 2000.
Till today no one claimed this money, it is lying in RDO office as it was returned back by the court for want of expiry date on cheque.
Recently i came to know this fact, during checking of some disputes in the family. This land belongs to my late Grand mother( Inam dhar of the land ), through will it came to my Late Father and through an Unregistered Will it came to me NOW (In 2010).
What should i do to claim this money, as for my knowledge(?) there is no PT existing on this land ! If any one is there, he could have pursued this in the COURT! Still , i dont want to take any chances. KINDLY GUIDE ME< THE STEPS I HAVE TO TAKE.
Thanking you ALL in advance.
Anonymous
14 May 2011 at 19:03
Dear Experts of the LCI,
In a land acquisition case, R&B department ( A P State) had finalised compensation but referred the case to a CIVIL Court ( U/s 30 of L.A.Act, 1894) for taking decision in regards to a Protected Tenant, Inam finalisation and Urban land ceiling , in the year 2000.
Till today no one claimed this money, it is lying in RDO office as it was returned back by the court for want of expiry date on cheque.
Recently i came to this fact, during the checking of some disputes in the family. This land belongs to my late Grand mother( Inam dhar of the land ), through will it came to my Late Father and through an Unregistered Will it came to me NOW( In 2010).
What should i do to claim this money, as for my knowledge(?) there is no PT existing on this land ! If any one is there, he could have pursued this in the COURT! Still , i dont want to take any chances. KINDLY GUIDE ME< THE STEPS I HAVE TO TAKE.
Thanking you ALL in advance.
Anonymous
14 May 2011 at 17:19
1) The power once delegated cannot be delegated further this is one of the principle of natural justice. This is in terms of POA any case law that executing a Power-of-Attorney by the Principal in which the Attorney is empowered to execute further Powers-of-Attorney on behalf of the Principal. Any clarification would be appreciated.
2)On which among the following, a garnishee order is not applicable?.
Answer : Amount deposited by the customer after receipt of the garnishee order.
Query : Pls provide me the case law or section it which says that amount deposited by the customer after receipt of the garnishee order are not liable for the granishing or does not come under the grnaishee order (Simply they cannot be taken away by the person who has issued the granishee order). But the above provision is also applicable to attachment order.
Garnishee orders are applicable in civil matters, tax recovery matters, revenue matters &
attachment order are applicable in DV cases, Maintenance cases & criminal cases ..................RIGHT ............OR.....................WRONG.
Thanks.
Anonymous
14 May 2011 at 16:54
On the Original Side, the Bombay High Court can try original cases, i.e., cases filed directly in the High Court itself and not coming up in appeal from the lower judiciary. So as per the income tax act, 1961 if the aggrieved party what to appeal for the judgment of the ITAT (income tax appellate tribunal) to the HC then the appeal will be heard at appellate side right? Then why under the Bombay high court site. With bold letter’s it has been said that
THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT (ORIGINAL SIDE) RULES
Chapter-XXXV
Rules relating To Reference And Applications Under Section 256 Of the
Income Tax Act, 1961.
It should be in corporate under the THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT (APPELLATE SIDE) RULES. Because Original Side, the Bombay High Court can try original cases, i.e., cases filed directly in the High Court itself and not coming up in appeal from the lower judiciary. So ITAT is the lower judiciary Right?
Valuable opinion required.
Thanks.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
about demarcation of joint survey numbers
can there be demarcation of the joint survey Numbers X,y,z