Anonymous
15 June 2011 at 17:21
In an employee's petition his lawyers has requested setting aside of final termination order as there is clear violation of natural justice principle. An advice of a senior lawyer has found the chargesheet invalid on account of it being issued by someone other than dosciplinary authority and also has vague charges. Is it necessary to seek quashing of chargesheet as well or the averments in petition will automatically take care of that
BAALASUBRAMANNYAMM
15 June 2011 at 16:58
Respected Experts,
I have given some hand loan to my friend 3 years 9 months back, by way of account payee crossed chque. At that movement, I was not taken any acknowledgement from him, because of trust and good faith. Due to overlook and mistake I was not demanding him in writing. Finally in the last month I approached him and demanded for payment. But simply he requeses to pay the amount on the ground of time barred. So at this juncture what I have to do.
1. Generally, the time limit is 3 years for recoevery of the amount. In case of more than 3 years what next.
2. I came to know that if I have given the amount on trust, I can collect the amount within 30 years.
So plz. clarify.
Debesh Nath Dasgupta
15 June 2011 at 14:26
Dear Experts,
Please provide me draft copy for Work Order with Terms & Conditions against civil, plumbing, electrical and architectural work scopes in our residence.
General t&c along with fixed time period and penalties and other useful terms should be mentioned.
Please make this as if you are going to place order for your home.
Treat this very very urgent.
Thanking you in anticipation,,,
Debesh Nath Dasgupta
Anonymous
15 June 2011 at 13:37
Sir,
I was working in autonomous sector(Govt of India)for last 15 years on adhoc basis. Last Nov 2010, my employer has turned down my request for further adhoc extension beyond 30.08.2010 with declaration that "With ref to HOD endorsement dated 30.09.2010, it has been decided not to extend the tenure beyond 30.08.2010"
During the argument before the CAT, my counsel has relied upon the decisons of supreme court but CAT has stated the recent decision of Uma devi case, the previous decisions don't stand and however pointed towards the counsel of Opposite Party that releiving order is stigmatic as HOD has endorsed the recommendation of Applicant and he has been relieved from services without hearing
The Hon'ble bench reserved the order
Respected expert members
My doubts are since I have been getting extensions every 6 months if order gone in my favor whether I will get the reinstatement with all back wages as more than 10 months have been passed or I will have to reapply for adhoc extension?
Since, I have served for more than 15 years cannot I plead for regularisation despite of Uma devi case?
My employer has made policies for D category personnel to regularise their services whether the same is not applicable for B-C category personnel??
Anonymous
15 June 2011 at 13:18
Sir,
There are 2 SLP which are pending before the Hon'ble Court arising from differnt orders of the High Court but have relevance with each other
If 2 SLP get dismissed, whether I can file the writ Petition before the Supreme Court of India for relief?
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
15 June 2011 at 12:53
Can acknowledgement be valid wherein time barred statements are relied, what are the basic requirements which should have in a letter of acknowledgement ?
Regarding Limitation :-
Time barred statement relied in the acknowledgement can be and can it be a valid or what should be consequences
In above queries can bank rely on such acknowledgement and take orders
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
Anonymous
15 June 2011 at 12:35
we are in process of registering a public charitable trust wherein one of the trustee is the company,
the application for registration was made by the Company Secretary of the Company as an authorised signatory of the company.
however, the same was not accepted on the ground that the company can not be a trustee and an applicant for making the application before the Charity Commissioner.
however, the Act allows the company to be a trustee if the MOA allows,can anybody guide on the above issue about the company be an applicant and trustee?
Anonymous
15 June 2011 at 12:26
In X unregistered partnership firm having 2 partners and 1 immovable property vested in the name of firm, 1 partner retired at will and simultaneously a company was introduced as a partner and the firm was now registered with ROF.
Now the other partner wish to retire at will, in this situation can a company hold the firm as a proprietary or how do we vest the property of the firm in the name of the company?
kindly guide the stamp duty and income tax implications.
B Guru Murthy
15 June 2011 at 08:26
Dear Forum members
1)Recently the POLICE officially wrote a letter to me to meet them and to dispose of the case. This happened after filing repeated RTI's.
a) Withdraw is Possible in in the Police Station?
b) In this case, can we believe the POLICE?
2)Counter Cases against the complainant can be filed for filling false 498acase, after withdraw.
Please enlighten me
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
M.V.Act
When the claiment dependant did not file any case under section 166 or 163A of the M.V.Act but he /she has filed a claim case under 140 m.v.act , is the case u/s 140 will be maintanable .