Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 20:00
Dear Sir(s),
The Hon'ble Judge of Dist & Sess.Court is not passing the order even after hearing arguments by all parties involved. Its almost 4 months, (that he has heard arguments) without any holidays in between.
Its the case of appeal on Commissioner's demolition order.(unauthorized construction)
Can he take so long? What is the remedy?
Please guide.
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 18:44
HI,
PLEASE LET ME KNOW ROLE OF POLICE IN DEBIT COLLECTION IN INDIA
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 18:41
what is the legal mean of possession?(immovable property)
what are the legal ways of transfer of possession?
Does occupation acquired by illegal or unlawful means/ by goondagardi can be considered legal possession in the eye of law?
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 17:57
I am a resident of B-3/407, Nand Nagri, Shadara Delhi -110093. My wife and mother was at home on 29.11.2011, at that time four women named , Murti, Lakshami, Yashoda and Usha entered into the house and forcefully taken my mother and wife out of the house. They beaten my wife and mother and tear off clothes of my wife and made naked her on the road, we had called police control room and police came. The police was taken all of them along with my wife and mother to police station at 5.00 on 29.11.2011. They kept them around 9.00 at police station and after it released them and taken sign on the compromise papers.
Now those four women and Mr. Sunder (husband of Lakshmi) are taunting my wife all the time whenever she crossed the gali or whenever they passing our house and using bad language. They all are belong to Schedule Caste and blaming us that we if says anything then they will be file the case against us in the name of Daleet Harassments.
Mr. sunder is a driver and after liquor he abusing my wife and the women are fully supported by him.
We are very lonely in the house and afraid by them. Please look into the matter and suggest what to do or take some action.
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 16:30
Sir,
Iwould like to know
1. in what circumstances a review petition is accepted in apex court
2. wheather any additional documents which were not produced during the normal hearing is considered for the acceptance of the review .
this is a civil case
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 13:40
I am one of the heirs of a building which is yet to partioned and mutated.One of the shops of the ground floor of the same is under the occupation of the son of the original tenant who died in 2007 and who has been a defaulter ever since.It may be noted that he is the eldest of three sons of the late tenant and there are a few other heirs are not gainfully employed have genuine needs to have the room unlawfully occupied by the present occupant.What are the legal remedies under WB Tenancy Act?
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 12:50
what is the difference between the public wakf and a private wakf ?
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 10:59
Sir,
We are residing in bangalore since from past 20 years. We both are working. From past five years we are facing some dispute in regard to ancistor property partition at our native place. We have filed for partition suit in local civil court and also a separate suit for declaration of our self acquired property in our native place. Mean while our father has filed a suit for maintence since we are working and getting income. Even though he is residing in our own house constructed in our native place and enjoying all the income earned out of ancistor property along with his younger son, can he ask for maintenance. Further our mother is sufferning from dementia desease from past 3 years we are looking after her and she is residing in her daughters house since there will be no one in our house to look after her after we both go to office. Prior to the filing of suit for partition she too was residing in our house at our native place. But later my brother and his wife harrased a lot to her and did not allow her to stay in that house peasefully. Hence she left the house, now these days she is willing to go and stay in that house and she is having a desire to live there for the rest of her life. she about 68 years now. Is there any provision in law so that she can take permission from court and stay there without any dispute from her younger son & his family. Can we look after her in the same status as we are doing now at present. Since from past 4 years we too are not going to that house since my brother is not allowing us to go he is having some criminal ideas in his mind to start some or the other quarrel and file a criminal suite against us so as to bring some problem to our job also. Hence please advice us how to proceed further legally so that ther will not be much more problems further.
Amar Jadhav
02 December 2011 at 10:43
under Mrtp Act sec 143 the planning authority/ development aoyhority of Pune (PMC) had passed a resolution to charge compounding fees to regularise the unauthorised construction. The levy of exorbitant fees as sought to be stipulated has no nexus with the provision 143 of MRTP Act and it also does not allow the PMC to charge such exorbitant fees
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Area differed in sale deeds of seller & purchaser and easement right case
‘A’ had two houses/buildings in a plot. Between the two buildings a four ft wide straight service lane exists. 30 years back, ‘A’ sells one building to ‘B’. Area mentioned in the sale deed as 600 sq ft without length and width details. After 14 years, ‘B’ sells this house/building to ‘C’ but area mentioned in the sale deed as 800 sq ft with length 40 and width 20 ft. While, he clearly declaring – he is selling the same house which he purchased from ‘A’. One another statement/declaration exists – whatever rights and uses he has in this house are transferring to ‘C’. According to area and dimension mentioned in the sale deed, excess length of 10 ft overlaps the lane and one third of the open area of ‘A’ but ‘C’ occupied and possessed only 650 sq ft by shifting the lane triangularly 4 ft toward ‘A’s open area and reconstructed the house accordingly. 5 years back, ‘A’ sells his second house/building with its remaining open area (after 4 ft occupation by ‘C’) to ‘D’. Now, ‘D’ is reconstructing the house with covering two third of the remaining open area. But ‘c’ objecting and filed easement right case, claiming that, besides one third open area adjacent to the building/constructed part the remaining two third open area was always in his use and before him it was always in previous owner’s (‘B’s) use.
My questions are –
1- Is the sale deed of ‘C’ valid? And/or in what extent it is valid or invalid? What may be consequences if ‘D’ raises this issue?
2- Despite other facts, by excess area and length (more than seller ‘B’s original area) mentioned in the ‘C’s sale deed, can ‘c’ get some supports/advantage for his claim of easement right?