kajal
14 February 2012 at 20:57
In a civil case during the pendency of a suit If the plaintiff wants any one of the defendent to transpose as proferma defendent what the plaintiff should do.kindly mention the relevent section and order. In case the case is a compensation-claim case under workman compensation act whether the claimant ask for transposition of one of the defendent as proforma defendent?
Mohan R
14 February 2012 at 19:58
Experts please,
I hv filed petition for probate of my father's regd will now. It is being done now after 14 years since my father passed away. The right to act became necessary now. There's no limitation period in the case of probate as per settled law. Article 137 confirms it. Can I have a couple of judgments which states there's no limitation period????
My best regards to you experts.
mukesh Gupta
14 February 2012 at 19:36
Sir(s),
One of my friends father applied for shares of a company's IPO. But he was not allotted the shares. The application money was also not refunded and correspondences were going on. Meanwhile unfortunately father died. Now the my friend along with his mother wants to file a consumer case. Can they file the case. One of their friend advise them to file a civil suit as they do not fall in the definition of consumer.
please advice in the matter.
Thanks.
pawan kumar
14 February 2012 at 18:30
summons were served to defendents and he put in his appearance also. his advocate appeared in subsequent date asking for adjournments and asked for some document which was provided. on subsequent dates defendent as well as his advocate stop appearing in court.and did not file written statementalso. court after giving 8 adjournments put costs which were not paid by defendent and court struck defence and put the case to ex parte evidence of plaintiff. is this is acase of ex parte if it is so it is not favourable to me. as many people say once court decide ex parte defendent will apply for setting aside the decree/judgement. pl. guide
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL
14 February 2012 at 18:20
A srilankan-tamilian landed in tamil nadu as refugee due to civil war in their country. At that time he was around 7 years. He was admitted at schoool by his parents. At that point to time they have erroenously given wrong date of birth. Now, he after completing his professional course applied for passport. The passport authorities insisted for birth certificate of thee municipal authorities. As civil war is over, he through his friends obtained birth certificate. Only on receipt of the same he noticed that his date of birth is different. Now he has wrong date of birth in his educational records and another correct date of birth in his passport. He apprehends that this may be impediment to his future studies abraod. He is not employed with government or private hospitals. Now guide me how to set right this anamoly. I need serious and conrete guidance please. CITATIONS IF ANY SHALL BE OF MUCH HELP.
jiten
14 February 2012 at 12:34
hello good after noon sir,i want to know that i filed caveat application in gujrat high court so i want to know that what is the procedure after that how much time court give me for reply.this possible that if i m not get any notice from court then court can give x-party order........pls reply me........thank you
MSC Shekar
14 February 2012 at 11:42
A Information Commission has become defunct; with many information commissioners retired and no new recruitees.
The Chief Information commissioner is highly overburned by this problem. As on date year 2009 appeals hearing are going on.
I have filed an appeal in 2011 for not getting requested information from a Govt. Department and keeiping in mind the present scenarion I dont know when this appeal will come for hearing.
My doubt here now is since the Information Commission has become defunct, Can I file writ in the Hon'ble High Court to get the requested information citing the above reasons. In my opinion atleast this will / may be faster.
Please advise.
Thank you in advance
uma
14 February 2012 at 09:15
I have an ancistor property from my grandfather.Both my Father and Grandmother compramised in lokadalat court settlement after death of grandmother lokadlat Final award is declared as dated 1998 december.
Before death of grand mother, she did a pending registration in SRO Ananthapalli,W. G. Dist,A.p and got the pending reg no.232/1997 at the time of pending registration lokadalt mater is not awarded,so that Registar was not gave the permanent registration number, and registration was kept in Pending reg no 232/1997,due to the reason for ownership proof of title of Property is not submited(she does not have Ownership proof copy).after she died in 1998 april,(after 60 days of death date), as dated june 20 1998,party who made a pending registration was converted to permanent registration and get the reg no 1174/1998 from SRO of Anathapalli W.G Dist,A.p.and party occupied the land. as per today date(2012,feb) revenue records the land owner is my grandfather.Is ther any special rigts in Registration act converting Pending registration to perminent registration without the person(owner) live?.Please suggest me for cancelling the registration, what type of information need to ask from registar office using RTI. and what type of records information to know for exact reasons for property registration was moved to Perminent registration.If it is invalid registration,Is there any chance to cancel the immovable property registration(after death of person).Please suggest me if any chance to get the property rights to claim.
Regards
Uma
suman
13 February 2012 at 20:16
Sir,
plaintiff(tenant)obtained permanent injunction against the Land Lord(house owner)for forceable eviction and interferance,which plea was not proved at any point in the trial.
The Defendants are prefering an appeal to set aside the erroneous judgment and vacate the stay.
Please help me to get citations Urgently from various courts wherein the Plaintiffs(tenants)are not entitled to seek permanent injunction against the owners.
Thank you Sirs.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Lawyer's behaviour
I have fought a job case in trial court for 8 years. Now opposite party's appeal is pending in high court. My lawyer was very good but suddenly he is behaving as if wants me to let other party win the case. It is very strange and I am particularly worried because my employer is very rich. How to be satisfied with lawyer's integrity and what options are there for me.