shobha
18 April 2012 at 16:51
Sir,
My husband has filed a suite for his share in ancistor property which is situated in his native place. Along with that he as filed for declaration of self acquired property in the same place. We are living separately since from our marriage ie.,1991 in bangalore and we are having separate income as we both are working for a public sector organisation. The suites were filed in 2007. My husbands brother who is residing in the house constructed by my husband in his self acquired property for which declaration suite has filed. Even my father in law is also residing with him. They both are disputing that the self acquired property also belongs to joint family since partition of property is not yet taken. Further they are producing some false evidences such as tax paid receipts electricity meter purchase receipts etc which were intentionally build up by him which we came to know during the course of cross examination. We have not taken any loan for construction of that house. But we are having the sale deed for the self acquired property and also the khata is in my husbands name. Further my husbands sisters who are married have also filed for their share in the ancistors propertey. They both are not disputing for self acquired property. Hence can my brother in law and father in law both have right on the self acquired property. how long this case may take for settlement.
Sanjay
18 April 2012 at 15:48
I came to understand that domicile certificate is a necessary document for a student for getting an admission in junior college in Mumbai.
I am in Mumbai since Nov 2006. My son needs to get an admission in junior college this year.
As per the rules explained by the officers, domicile cannot be given as the tenure of residence in Mumbai is not sufficient.
What shall be the lawful way to get an admission in Mumbai Junior college?
Anticipate help.
gajraj chandel
18 April 2012 at 10:38
The execution court is only transferring the possession of the immovable property which the JD is holding . I have to pursue with the local authorities after the registry to make the title perfect.My query is what will be the registry charges since the title is not perfect.Specific performance was decreed by SC where only possession not the title was granted under section 5 of the specific performance act. Thanks in advance. Your advice will save me a lot in monitory terms.
Sameer Talha
18 April 2012 at 10:36
We Reside in a Pagdi building in Malad, the rent receipts is in my father name & and as confirmed from the lawyers Club they have said that you cannot get loan on pagdi system then how come my Father get a loan of 15 Lacs as bank has not approached the Landlord. my Father is suffering from Bipulor Depression and he wants us to remove from his house including my mother please Advice me what should i do to prevent loan
rajvinder singh
18 April 2012 at 08:07
i have already asked this query but i have suspicion inmy mind which i want to clear.
the pre decree has been passed in suit for possession.we went for first and secong appeal but lost there.
in the mean time when our appela was pending the plaintiff filed application under 20 rule 18 to which we gave the reply that our appeal is pending before high court
now appeal is decided does we can now file objections in proceedings for final decree which were initiated when our applea was pending. is there any judgement whcih i can show to judge
Jamuna
17 April 2012 at 23:24
hello,
I am looking for a lawyer in Mumbai who can handle a case of noise pollution. I have a decibel check report from the government environment department. The noise levels are very high than the prescribed limit. BMC and police are simply delaying my case.
Pls reply to my query soon.
thank you.
K.P.BHAT
17 April 2012 at 21:25
ONE ADVOCATE ACCEPTED THE VAKALATH. THE CLIENT PAID Rs.10000.00 TO THE ADVOCATE. THE ADVOCATE DID NOT ISSUE ANY RECEIPT TO THE CLIENT. IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CASE, HE WITHDREW FROM THE CASE BY REPORTING NO INSTRUCTIONS WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE/CONSENT OF THE CLIENT.
THE CLIENT APPROACHED THE CONSUMER FORUM FOR DEFICIENCY OF SERVICE. NOW THE ADVOCATE SAYS THAT, HE HAS GIVEN FREE SERVICE AS SUCH THERE IS NO CONSIDERATION. HENCE THE COMPLAINT IS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
WHAT TO DO WHEN ADVOCATES TAKE THE FEES AND DO NOT ISSUE ANY RECEIPT/PROOF. IN FUTURE, ALL THE CLIENTS MUST AND SHOULD DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR FEES PAID TO THE ADVOCATE.
PL.GUIDE ME.
A SUFFERED CLIENT
kamal
17 April 2012 at 19:34
IN RENT CASE SUIT IS PENDING FOR NON PAYMENT OF RENT AND HAS COME TO THE STAGE OF EXPARTE EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF AS TENANT DEFENCE IS STRUCKOF AND DUE TO HIS CONTINOUS ABSENCE COURT HAS ASKED FOR EXPARTE EVIDENCE OFPLAINTIFF. PL. GUIDE IHAVE AGREEMENT SIGNED BY TENANT DETAILING CONDITIONS OF TENANCY AND AMOUNT OF RENT. IHAVE CERTIFIED STATEMENT OF A/C IN BANK SHOWING PAYMENT OF RENT BY CHEQUES. DOES THESE DOCUMENT ARE SUFFICIENT IN EVIDENCE TO PROVE AMT. OF MONTHLY RENT AS WELL AS DATE WHEREFROM DEFAULT IS. WITNESS TO RENT AGREEMENT IS ALSO AVAILABLE FOR GIVING EVIDENCE IN FAVOUR OF PLAINTIFF
niketa
17 April 2012 at 18:11
Dear Sir,
Me and my husband are working in semi Govt organisation,mumbai.We stay in office quarters.I was allotted with a quarter before marriage so quarter is on my name and my HRA is deducted.
Now since i got married to my colleague,will his HRA also get deducted?
Regards,
Niketa Thakare
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Production of documents
A recovery suit is filed by plaintiff against deft. At the time of filing written statement by deft. xerox copies of certified documents (in respect of earlier proceeding U/s. 138 of NIA wherein deft. is acquitted) & notice reply to the demand notice of plaintiff were produced on record. Plaintiff's evidence is over. Deft. at the time of filing his chief examination filed original certified copies & office copy of notice reply (as mentioned above) alongwith an application for production of documents on which court called other side's say. Plaintiff relied on AIR 2002 SC 100 (Madanlal Vs. Shamlal) and rejected application of deft. for production of document. Particulars of those documents are mentioned in chief of deft. Now those documents are required to be exhibited but how ? Whether Madanlal Vs. Shamlal is over ruled ? How those documents can be exhibited as production of same is rejected ?