RAMJI
04 December 2012 at 22:21
Sir, please clarify on the following in civil suit for partition...
Im plaintiff, there are 8 defendants and notice to D7 was served in private to NEW ADDRESS OF D7 as orderd by court and AOS submitted LAST HEARING...as such no change in my address...
NOW, the address of D7 given in plaint was last resided and now notice served at new address ...
Questions
1. now SHOULD I FILE TO COURT UNDER ORDER VI RULE 14 (A)(2) informing to court that the REGISTERED ADDRESS OF D7 IS CHANGED...
or D7 must file in his W/statement? .. who is to file me or D7?
2. Is there any standard format for such filing or can i file it as a memo...
3. Can we file as many no.of memo at anytime during the pendency of case or any restriction on this....
Please clarify...
regards
RAMJI
Member (Account Deleted)
04 December 2012 at 21:50
Q)my wife has filed transfer petiton in supreme court for transfer of my divorce case. today was my hearing nd according to my lawyer court order me and my wife to present on next hearing. i am confused for what reason court order my presence?is it neccessary personal appearence in such case? does court send me summons? what happen if i wont appear? plz reply soon
Suman Khurana
04 December 2012 at 13:20
Hi
i am the student of LLB final year. i need help of you all for the preparation of my final year project.
plz provide me the following information in relation to civil matters:
1. Draft original petition
2. Draft affidavit
3. Draft Execution petition
4. Draft memorandum of appeal and revision
5. Draft petition under article 226 and 32 of the constitution of india
above drafts can be related to any civil matter.
plz email the same at hinnagarg83@gmail.com
Thanks
sck
04 December 2012 at 13:15
Due to personal reasons I have to fill Annexture K & G to get my passport reissued and apply for fresh one for my son. As per requirement it has to be sworn before First Class Judicial Magistrate . Not a single magistrate in pune court is ready to do this. My lawyers tried a lot not just professionaly but also personaly. Please suggest solution for this.
Anup Dave
04 December 2012 at 12:53
I am a NRI. My father has left many of his properties in Chandigarh and in some cities of Punjab, India. These are all the properties which he made with his hard earned money. The properties include two houses and also lands in some vilalges. After marriage I moved to UK with my husband. Now I have learnt from a few of my relatives that my uncle (my father's real brother) and his son are trying to illegally sell these properties and usurp the amount. Please tell me what should I do to stop these people. Also suggest me a lawyer to handle my case as I do not know any lawyer there.
Would highly appreciate any help.
K G Srinivasan
03 December 2012 at 19:19
A pecular case:
The famous MNC bank, ICICI Bank Ltd, had given a housing loan for a to be constructed flat to a borrower at chennai, which was paid directly to the builder without the consent of the borrower and after two years the bank had written to the builder not to hand over the possession as the borrower had not deposited the uds sale deed.But the borrower insists that he had deposited the sale deed and other agreements and only after that he was made to sign the home loan agreement and after a couple of months another agreement by name facility agreement was signed.The nett result is the bank is in the possession of the property as well as the documents.In spite of having the possession the bank displayed the name of the bank entrance door of the flat when the case was under process in the state consumer forum, which made the borrower to suspend the emi after paying to the bank till four long years without possession. Then the bank issued notice under sarfaesi act and a suitably reply was given stating that the borrower is willing to settle the entire amount if the bank hand over the possession and the bank did not consider the reply and filed an OA in the DRT for which the borrower stated the same fact accepting the liability to pay the entire amount and ask the court to direct the bank to hand over the possession. The bank filed an IA for the property which was in his possession and the court without going through the file and listening to the borrower's advocate allowed the IA for attachment.Here it will be fit to move the DRAT or to file a WRIT petition to seek direction, to stop the bank in legal manuring and to close the issue as the borrower is suffering for 7 years?
anil sharma
03 December 2012 at 18:04
respeced sir,
can I take a photo copy of service book of a retaired employeed under RTI,after the latest supreme court order,
please guide me, becasue many peoples are saying that service book is a personal and you can not take a certified copy under sec 8(1)(j)
is it true
Malabika Basu
03 December 2012 at 15:34
Malabika Basu
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:15 am
My Father-in-Law is the original tenant for over 40 years and he is occupying a 600 Sqft flat in South Kolkata Area. My Mother-in-law died 9 years ago. My husband is the only son and we are staying with him. We are paying rent as per West Bengal New Tenancy Act and the rent bill is in the name of my father-in-law. Now I would like to know – after death of my father-in-law whether we have any legal right to stay upto five years in that flat ? If yes, then in whose name the rent bill will be issued by the landlady ? or, if the landlady wants can she evict us immediately after the death of my father-in-law? What will be the basis of rent which we have to pay (will it be on the basis of old rent which is my father-in-law is paying ) or landlady can force us to pay new rent ? Please help me by answering my queries. Thank you.
ABHIJEET
03 December 2012 at 12:56
I hve filed appeal us sec.74 of Bombay tenancy act for set aside order of agriculture land tribunal to SDO ..the court rejected my appeal for opponent has order to sale said land us of btal act .
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bare injunction suit
1.a coparcener filing bare injunction suit against another coparcener who is not karta or manager-whether maintainable
2.a compromise decree which was previously made with respect to a few ancestral properties,for the sake of land reforms act in karnataka , and which was not meant to be acted upon.
now we have filed a bare injunction suit on all the properties as also the properties which were earlier part of alleged compromise decree.iam not in a position to go for partition at this stage as there are other issues involved.now judge has raised his doubts over whether temporary injunction can be granted in this case
iam not a lawyer, pls help me with relevant citations, as my lawyer is not able to source them