A KUMAR
03 January 2013 at 18:25
Respected Sir/Madam
I am living at Kalkaji Double Storey Quaters, alloted to my father by l&do at ground floor, my father Expired in 2011, the person residing above our house had constructed 2nd floor illegally in 1995 & in 2011 he constructed 2nd floor also, my father when he is alive in August 2011 made a complaint at 100 No. once when he making 2nd floor they stopped for few days but again after few days they complete the construction.
Now, Due to load )2nd Floor) our lanter on ground floor craked from the centre and walls has also craked, because govt. alloted these houses for refugeesin 1952 after partition of India/Pakistan and govt. not aware that people construct more stories on these buildings. Now we one ground floor afraid if building destoray in future. I write on Delhi Govt. Site "AAP KI SUNWAI" and after 10 days two people from MCD Depptt. Came to our house and my mother shows them craked lanter. Next day when I checked the status of my complaint they mentioned that we checked the site and at present there is no construction going on the site.
Sir, will you please help me what should I do or where I can make the compaint for the same or can I file a suit for the same illegal construction.
A Kumar
Shreyas
03 January 2013 at 14:38
We are having tenants & sub trnants by them since 30 years in pune. They are having shops & godown at a rent of rs 100-rs 200 per months. There is no written agreement but receipts are given by us since the start. Cases are pending since 10-15 years. Please guide me as to how to evacuate them from our premises. Does maharashtra rent act applies to this? How can the matter be solved?
Sir can the rent enhancement petition be filled as an amendment as our case is going on in high court or we will have to file a new case in lower court?
& can anyone please give me a rough idea as to how much times the rent can be increased upto as the current rent is only Rs.100- Rs. 200 per month.
4WhatIsRight
03 January 2013 at 13:52
We are a private limited company and are pursuing a title suit for specific performance of contract.
The defendant in his written statement have been using derogatory terms "practice fraud by evading government revenue" "evil design". He has not presented an iota of substantiating evidence.
We are deeply disturbed by such baseless allegation and more over the kind of words he is using.
Can we sue him for using such derogatory words.
What are the available options?
Rikin
03 January 2013 at 13:21
What is the court fee to file for succession in Delhi & Gurgaon?
TR Madhavan
03 January 2013 at 11:18
1. What no objection vakalatnama means?
2. NOV issuing person has to intimate only the appellant/complainant or he/she should inform concerned courts also? Is there any time limit?
3. If NOV issued to the party long back and not informed to concern court in time, any action will be taken on the issue against him/her by the courts?
DEVENDRA
02 January 2013 at 21:55
In maharashtra, in many 7/12 extracts - in other rights column, there are entries regarding private mortgages which were made during 1950s to 1970s. The mortgagee persons are now not known to anybody, whether alive or not. The revenue officers say about an Act made in 1978 at the time of Nationalisation of Banks. According to them, private mortgages were abolished. But no revenue officer can tell about that Act. Can anyone tell me about that act? The name of Act ? Whether it is ccentral Act or state Act ? How to remove the entries in other rights column regarding private mortgages ( Taran Gahan )?
4WhatIsRight
02 January 2013 at 21:55
A defendant in a t.s. for specific performance of contract, wherein issues have been framed, has pleaded in his application for amendment of written statement that certain statements in written statement filed are not in accordance with his instruction to his previous lawyer.
hence he wants to delete a particular paragraph and add a new paragraph.
Can such plea be allowed where the defendant a learned man has verified all pages of the w.s. under affidavit?
-the plea which he wishes to introduce is dishonest plea.
-not a case of despite due diligence
-repudiation of clear admission is to deprive the plaintiff from rights accrued to him by the admissions and it displaces the plaintiff completely from the admission in the original written statement.
I need some current citations for refusal of objection to amendment of written statement.
AAK
02 January 2013 at 17:48
Dear Experts
I have obtained a ex-parte decree against one Deccan Cargo India Private Limited company. Now at the time of execution of the decree, the court officer has filed the report that the doors of the company (Judgement Debtor) is locker and nobody is there, hence notice not served.
I dont know any the details of the properties to get an attachment from the court. Can any one suggest me the best remedy? is there any option for me to obtain order for civil arrest, if yes, against whom?
Mahadeva Rao G
02 January 2013 at 13:54
Respectful Experts,
I am Rao- ADVOCATE seeking help from various subject experts in here wrt to aforesaid subject.
FACTS : In the year 1967 i.e., 46 years back, my client has purchased a property vide registered sale deed & subsequently the same has been mutated & entries in R.T.C.& such other revenue documents have been effected in the year 1967. Even the EC taken reflects the transaction. & my client was genuinely in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property an by paying requisite tax and until recently all the revenue records reflected the above transaction. Now after almost 46 years, taking some concocted documents of 1940 without making my client & adjacent land owners a necessary parties to the RRT case, he has passed an ORDER changing all revenue entries at his whim & fancies favouring the fraudulant applicant with whom he is become partner in the land. The aggrieved parties i.e, adjacent land owners have gone for appeal before Asst.Commissioner and has brought STAY ON THE TAHSILDAR ORDER. As on date there is Four STAY ORDERS has been granted by Asst. Commissioner to four different aggrieved parties pertaining to the same survey number.
Now having no jurisdiction over the subject matter while the matter is pending disposal before AC court in four seperate cases, the tahsildar has been desperately trying to conduct survey by directing jurisdiction police illegally to give protection to the survey officials and indisguise of police protection the tahsildar is trying to establish possession favouring his partners / applicants by dispossessing the original lawful owners in possession for 46 long years with valid documents.
I seek help from experts here on what is the course of action I should take against the Tahsildar by way of WRIT / PCR.. ETC for
1. For changing the revenue entries without due notice and making the adjacent parties a necessary parties to the RRT filed before him.
2. Without any jurisdiction since there is a STAY granted by AC court, he is directing the police to give protection, to conduct illegal survey to favour his partners / applicant even though it is a private property.
3. Usage of filthy language and threating the original owners to arrest them and file cases against the adjacent original lawful owners, who went to speak to him about the wrong order he has made.
4. Three times he was unsuccessful to conduct the survey due to public resisteace but still he has ordered ( written ) to police three times and not even giving notices to the adjacent land owners in all the three times he is trying to conduct illegal survey.
Since he is a official with powers he is misuing his office by threatning & behaving arbitrarily and being innocent law abiding citizens the land owners are fearing the adverse actions and harassment he has threatened the land owners and it is become day to day head ache for all the adjacent land owners and is on the verge of getting dispossessing from their lawful possesion. PLEASE GIVE YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS IN THIS MATTER URGENTLY. THANKS.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mact
Sir,
Driver of school bus, who is owner of the vehicle also, had driving license. DL was valid up to 4.12.2012.
Driver who has driving experience of 18 years could not apply for renewal of license due to mistake.
on 07-12-2012 he got accident and collided with bike. and bike rider died at the stop.
Now wife of bike driver has filed claim petition.
Vehicle was duly insured.
Sir, how can driver/owner can escape from liability. Is there any rule for time extension for renewal of DL. Or is there any case law to save the driver from liability. Please refer.