Rama Krishnan
11 May 2013 at 22:41
DEAR EXPERTS,
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE OPINION OF EXPERTS ON BELOW QUESTIONS, IF POSSIBLE WITH RELEVENT LEGAL BACKINGS
1. CAN AN IMPORTER INCREASE MRP OF THE PRODUCT BEFORE CUSTOMS CLERANCE OF THE GOODS, MEANS GOODS ARRIVED BUT IMPORTER DID NOT FILE BILL OF ENTRY , APPROCHES CUSTOMS TO INCREASE MRP?
CAN THE SAME PROCESS BE DONE FOR DECREASE ALSO
REQUEST EXPERTS COMMENTS
Ranjan
11 May 2013 at 19:42
Can a application of condonation of delay under section 5 read with section 17 of the limitation Act, 1963 be filed for institution of suit which is barred by limitation ( suit which is 22 years late)?
Vijay Kumar
11 May 2013 at 14:28
Kindly enlighten.
what type of Suits are there over which the Supreme Court has original Civil Jurisdiction?
Dr Sangh Mittra
11 May 2013 at 11:45
Madam/ Sir
Are there any Laws in India which protect the the residential pieces of Lands/ houses of the Defence personnel who serve away from their Home states, under the Union of India (from the UNILATERAL , ARBIRARY AND WITHOUT SERVICE OF CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE Land Acquisition by the State Governments)?
Is there any State in India which provides protection/ immunity from the Land Acquisition to Soldiers of the Armed Forces by the State?
Is there still no proposed amendment in the Land Acqusition Bill about which Shri Jai Ram Ramesh wrote and circuated a draft especially for protecting the landed proporty rights of the soldiers?
Why should any sensible person join the Armed Forces of the Country if back home when he would serve in the Armed Forces either his brethren or the State Government grab/ gobble up his property?
If everyone remains perched to the purchased proprty and erects his structures who will leave homes and fight the enemies at the Borders?
There is a case that the poor people who choose to become Soldiers and Officers and who purchase out of their hard earned pay some piece of Land during their service and who donot construct the houses while in service theirs pieces of Land need to be exempted from acquisition on the same lines as of those who erected residential structures and be living in these.
Is there no one in this Country who can with stand the lure of lucre doled by the Land mafia.
Have heart spare the siezed land of the soldiers in Haryana.
There are numerous stories of Soldier's wife back home... when he serves at the borders ...
Haryana has contributed yet another that besides the hapless wife even the land of the Soldier is taken possession of and that too without there being any service of constructive notice to the Johnie?
Haryana, they say , has every tenth Soldier of the Indian Armed Forces, from its State but the State Government is, now leading in dispossessing the Soldiers of their residentail pieces of Land (after more than twenty years when the Soldiers have held the Land on their names in the State Revenue records and have paid for the registered ownership).
On what principle of Justice has the Haryana Government dispossessed the hapless Soldiers, acquired their lands on the grounds that no residential structures were raised on their plots knowing fully well that a serving soldier does not construct houses in which he would not live while in the Services?
Those officers and Soldiers who purchased in 1980s the small pieces of Land in Villages Nangal Sodian and Islampur in Pinjaur, District Panchkula, Haryana were assured that their pieces are safe back home for them to come back and construct house after they get money on their retirements. But to their dismay to Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) after the most unfair acquisition has got over their residential pieces for selling these as residential plots to others at higher rates.
Earlier an SDM of the Haryana Government had , on the name of the development by using his Sister and relations, collected hefty fees from those Soldiers who had purchased plots in the Villages Islampur and Nangal Sodian saying Haryana Housing Board has approved and the said Hill View Enclave existed as a Colony, he got it registered as a Cooperative Society without owning even an inch of Land . The Soldiers who had never purchased the plots from the Society but directly from the farmers got these registered. They owned these for more than 20 years and no one objected to their possession and registeration on their names but when the prices soared HUDA placed demand for its acquisition for Public Purpose.
The State can not dispossess even on the Law of Adverse possession but who bothers for the Poor Soldier in this Country?
Is there any Public Purpose in such an acquisition ?
Is this rape of the rights of the Soldiers a Public Purpose?
Ask the Rapists and in unison they would say Ayes.
Will some one send this message to Madam Sonia Gandhi and Shri Rahul Gandhi?
Because its only they who can set the things right in this Country others only bake their cakes. Because the illustrious Gandhi family has never had any personal motives nor were any time hungry for power or pelf.
Will some one send this case to the Hon'ble Lordships? Will they Take Notice of it Suo Motto?
Will some one in the Media highlight it?
They saw Law is Blind and an Ass.
And the Soldier a traditional loser -
at the hands of those who have absolutely no respect for those who guard the Nation .
Will some one not file a PIL or is that one has to pay even for PILs.
Who will help the cause of Soldiers who have been dispossessed discriminatingly and without the right of hearing in Villages Nangal Sodian and Islampur in District Panchkula , Haryana?
Regards,
Dr SM
sillvi
10 May 2013 at 23:55
Do the DV case goes in fovour of wife most of the time even if she has minor proofs that to falsely created and tell me how to fight false DV case.
payal
10 May 2013 at 23:25
If it's a small case of family dispute,Is it necessary for each n every family member to attend the hearing.
If any one of the person is busy and can't attend .Can we submit some medical doc that the particular person can't attend as they are not well.
sillvi
10 May 2013 at 19:19
hi experts, first of all i want to know that DV act is criminal or civil? next is that my wife has filed false 498 against me and my parents and then DV act against me and my parents and she has asked for her marriage expenses some 5lakh, False dowry amount of some 2 lakh, maintenne of some 20000/-p.m and compensation of some 20 lakh. she herself is working with salary of some 20+.i want o know that can anyone asking for this much can get in this DV case and what is the maximum maintainence and compensation in Dv case.
MSC Shekar
10 May 2013 at 17:59
In a Right To Information application a Director Level Office of a Government Department forwards a incorrect/false information received from its subordinate office to an RTI applcant.
It is primafacie understood by both Director Level office and its sub ordinate office that the information is false / incorrect. Yet the same is submitted to the RTI applicant
My query here is whether the Director Level office can also be charged for Purgery?
Thanks in advance
Member (Account Deleted)
10 May 2013 at 17:20
"A" has executed GPA in favour of "B" to sell a land worth 80,00,000/- and recieved a sum of 40,00,000/- from "B", now "A" died so what are the options left with "B"
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Status quo ante
please tell how and when i can apply for restoration of status quo ante..and under which provision of law can a court grant status quo ante.