Member (Account Deleted)
13 July 2013 at 16:58
In 1980, we bought a flat with family pooling of funds. Father pooled in 40%, brother B1 -40%, brother B2 -10%, brother B3 -10 %.
The flat was bought in the name of the eldest brother B1 and the title deed is in his name.
Is brother B1 the sole and exclusive owner as the title deed is in his name?
If the flat is to be sold , will brother B1 get all the money or do the other brothers have a legitimate share in it by virtue of their pooling in money to buy the same?
Does ownership get affected if B1 is not physically residing in the house? Father, B2 and B3 have been living there since it was bought.
koustubh bhide
13 July 2013 at 16:34
Probate of will is reuired in thane district.?
in which areas probate is compulsory?
prasannakumar .k
13 July 2013 at 15:28
for the encouragement plaintiff filled case in junior civil judge court that court not has precarious jurisdiction on that base case was returned to plaintiff, after that filed in Sr division that court also returned for suite under valued its not have jurisdiction for trail it order to fail in Jr division whether its maintainable order 2 rules 2 not hit if it Barr of suit please help me with some of citations
SANKET UPADHYAY
13 July 2013 at 12:09
In the year of 2000 Mrs.kapilaben patel was dead, and she was make a will of her property,her daughter challenge her will in executive magistrate court.executive magistrate refuse her daughter's plea. my question is that " Has executive magistrate power to hear to this type of will dispute?
Member (Account Deleted)
13 July 2013 at 11:42
These days many companies fool customers by making false promises over the telephone and new technology have made it possible to record the same.
But a consumer court President says, it is not admissible as firstly we do not have enough infrastructure to look into the same and it is otherwise also complicated, so you can better proceed in a civil court.
Though, the main evidence lies in the form of Audio Conversation only, where the head of the respondent company, one month after leaving the job admitted to have replaced products of other customers as that TV model was suffering from manufacturing defects ?
Please provide some grounds or even citation, if possible, as to how audio conversation can be made admissible in the consumer court.
Thanks in anticipation !
arun atmaram more
13 July 2013 at 10:43
i have filed insolvency petition on 27 july 2009 in court pending for adjudication. meanwhile ex-parte arbitration award is passed in favour of one the creditor in june 2009. now that creditor has filed application as regular darkhast in another court in april 2013 for attachment of property.the said creditor is not appeared in insolvency petition in spite of receiving notice of insolvency petition. what are the steps to be taken in in this case ?
mosheerul haque
13 July 2013 at 08:11
i have lost my ration card. I want a new ration card. What is the procedure to get it ? And what documents are needed ?
Siddhi Agarwal
13 July 2013 at 07:55
In a petition no. 323 of 2013 filed against BMC for permission to repair the repairable buildings the judges SJ Vazifdar and MS Sonak have diverted the whole issue and pressurizing the tenants to accept redevelopment with untenable terms of the land lords who have got the power & water cut due to callous attitude and criminal nexus with BMC. Tenants have paid huge amount as goodwill / pagdi in 1960 and have no problem as long they have continued protection under Bombay Rent Control Act and their rent does not shoot up 15-to 20 fold in the redeveloped building as demanded by the crooked land lords but judges are not concerned and want to throw away the tenants that means the rogue politicians and judiciary want middle class to be eliminated all together with only two classes to deal with one the like of Mukesh Ambani who grabbed WAQF property and other labours both of which are well organized and can get their say by hook or crook. Now the question is if the judges arm twist the tenants in a covert way can tenants file a review petition against such rogue judgement ? What are the other option open to tenants in the matter ? It is pity that while the slums dwellers are being provided ownership flats the tenants and law abiding citizens are denied the ownership in redeveloped bldgs. Our corporater and MLA are hand in glove with the notorious land lords and Arvind Kejariwas AAP is no where to be seen. Pl. help as it is the factual situation in the country boasting of thriving democracy which suits only Rober Vadera, Rahul Gandhi any many such people.
sandeep mathur
13 July 2013 at 00:16
REPLY OF YOUR LEGAL NOTICE : LOAN ACCOUNT NO 5806, AND 5811
DEAR MR.ADVOCATE
REF TO OUR TEL-CON PLS FIND MY REPLY AS BELOW :
1. I HAD ALREADY REPLAYED YOU EARLIER WITH MY MEDICAL DOCS.. ACTUALLY I AM SUFFERING FROM ASCETIC TB AND TREATMENT IS STILL CON TUNE.
2.SINCE 2010 I AM NOT ABLE TO PAY INSTALLMENT ON REGULAR BASIS AND WHEN EVER I GOT FUND I PAID TO YOUR HOME LOAN DIV.
3.I HAD TOLD MR.WIG AS SOON I WILL RECOVER FROM MY ILLNESS I WILL RE START PAYING MY INSTALLMENT AND DUE AMOUNT.
4. IF I AM PAYING INSTALLMENT FROM LAST 10 YEARS SO WHY SHOULD I WILL NOT PAY IN FURTHER PRESENTLY I AM ENABLE TO PAY INSTALLMENT DUE TO MY ILLNESS
5. HOME LONE WAS PROVIDE ME ON THE BASIS OF THAT TIME MY FINANCIAL SITUATION BUT EVERY TIME CAN NOT BE SAME FOR EVERY ONE EVEN. ALSO NOTE PRESENTLY I HAVE HARD TIME IN MY LIFE AND I WILL BE RECOVER SOON TO REPAY HOME LOAN.
7 PROPERTY WORTH OF MORE THAN 98% OF BALANCE HOME LOAN. SO IT PAS PAID IN LAST 10 YEARS SO WILL BE CLEAR SHORTLY.
SO PLS CONSIDER MY REQUEST AND GIVE ME SOME TIME TO REPAY ALL DUES AND FURTHER BALANCE HOME LOAN INSTALLMENT.
AWAITING YOU REPLY AND CONSIDER THIS MAIL REPLY TO YOUR LEGAL NOTICE SINCE I CAN NOT GO TO POST OFFICE TO SEND YO REGISTERED POST.
DEAR EXPERT PLS ADVISE WHAT IS BEST WAY TO GET SOME MORE TIME TO REPAY BALANCE HOME LOAN.
Thanks And Regds
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sec 9 of city tenants act
Respected senior's
The charitable trust has filed a suit against the 5th superstructure holder/tenant. I am the 5th owner purchased the superstructure and till date iam paying rent to the trust. Now the stage has come to trial. At this stage, when i filed Sec 9 (to purchase the land of the trust)my application was rejected stating time limit is 30days after receiving suit summons. Whether my application can be entertained and how? after purchasing this property iam here for morthan 20 years. Kindly suggest me how i can protect the property without giving to the charitable trust?