kumar
12 July 2013 at 22:59
Hi all,
In a Hindu joint family when partition is done in joint family properties while father is alive,by alloting property shares to father and children seperately..
(1)Does the mother have a right to ask a share seperately in joint family properties for herself only?
(2)Is it mandatory to allot a share to mother while father is alive (or) is it optional to allot a share to mother while father is alive?
Adv. Yogesh Pawar
12 July 2013 at 22:13
respected sir/madsm,
I have property at jm rd pune.
I have tenant for 100sqft area before 26 yrs ago.
we have taken that property for development before 26yrs on condition to give him same area in developed property. but after development we have failed to give him premises, so he filed case against us small cause court then district court and then high court. after that we settled the matter out of court mutually and given possession of premises before 5 yrs on rs1200 rent monthly. but today's actusl rent value is rs 10000 per month. how can I get the proper rent of market value?
SRINIVAS SURVI
12 July 2013 at 21:59
After passing a decree in civil court whether adducing of fresh evidence is necessary before DRT in OA to obtain a recovery certificate
Shumaila Altaf
12 July 2013 at 21:54
I am the power of holder of Mr.A. I have filed a suit for declaration, temporary and mandatory injunction. Defendant No.1 purports to be the power of attorney holder of Mr.B. this Mr.B claims to be the co-sharer of the property of my principal for which i have been appointed as the attorney. now the question is do I as attorney holder have a right to sue. the opposite counsel has moved an application under order 7 rule 11(a) stating that I(plaintiff) do not have any cause of action as my right is not being violated.According to him it is my principal's right that is being violated. can anyone please help with a suitable judgment as i have been directed to produce one by the Hon'ble court.
Surya Prakasham Kottapalli
12 July 2013 at 21:41
DEAR SIR,
OURS IS 4 STORYED BUILDING WITH THREE FLATS IN EACH FLOOR. I AM RESIDING IN MY OWN FLAT IN SECOND FLOOR. THE THIRD FLOOR OWNER HAS GIVEN HIS FLAT TO A TENANT. SINCE FOUR MONTHS THE TENANT HAS BOUGHT A DOG WHICH IS GIVING US SLEEPLESS NIGHTS. HOW TO CONTROL THIS MENANCE.
Subramanya G Rao
12 July 2013 at 21:33
Dear Sir,
Registered release deed datted april 1, 1998 executed by wife to her husband on behalf of mother,6 sisters, 2 brothers of her husband for an immovable property through an unregistered gpa dated feb 2, 1998 is valid? Does it, valid on the grounds of evidence act based on the presumption of conclusive proof that all pre transactions related to this release deed such as gpa ,partition etc need not be called for proof of evidence but is prooved by this registration? Can you name some court cases trial judgements with ref numbers related to this ?
“ If the registered release deed is valid then the unregistered gpa through which release deed has been executed and the unregistered family partition deed are also valid ? isn’t it ?
If No –
How can law allowed release deed to get registered when gpa , family partition are not registered in 1998 and are not valid ? Is this not contradictory ?
If the law has allowed this in 1998 and If it is contested now How can law says no ? is it correct in providing justice to either of the parties who have contested on this ? How truth prevails ?
I am sorry I am naive please correct me if I am wrong in my understanding and expressions.
( I understand gpa registration was not compulsory in 1998 but the answer “no” to validity of gpa contradicts it’s own law of “yes” for validity of registere Release deed isn’t it?
Don’t you think that validity of unregistered gpa and family partition can be contested and asked for a proof in court of law, now ? If yes Why release deed permitted to get registered with unregistered gpa in 1998 and asking for proof now when most of the people are passed away. This lacuna provides opportunity for contestants who said yes in 1998 to say no in 2013. Does time limit bar helps truth to prevail ? )
Thanks
Subramanya
ravi
12 July 2013 at 19:12
Dear Experts,
I need a sr. advocate to fight case against tenant, though there was no tenant agreement, the house was illegally occupied by one lady without any information and agreement. When we approached her and asked her to vacate the house she refused to do that and instead filed a case in civil court. I need help to in this regard.
Ravi
9818106514
Kenneth Abreu
12 July 2013 at 18:36
There is a 16' wide lane running in the middle of 2 row of houses opposite to each other. The lane is enough for 2 Maruti/Alto cars to bypass each other. My house is in the middle of one of the rows which leads out to a 20' wide road which connects to a 25' road. I am denied entry/exit as a Bolero is permanently parked and not used at the entry/exit point. Repeated requests to park the Bolero (whose owner has a corner house) on to the 20' road has gone unheeded since the last one year. Being a senior citizen I find it risky to bypass the Bolero as my car may slip into a 1' drain and turn turtle. Driving out from the front is easier than backing as another vehicle is at the other entry/exit point.
Please help.
Nikit Rastogi
12 July 2013 at 18:31
Dear Member,
Kindly guide me in the following matter. I have filed a Civil Case for Permanent Injunction. The respondents Lawyers try to delay the case and from the date of filing suit, the written statement and no documentary evidence in support of their pleadings been produced. Irrelevant Judicial Precedent is produced in each hearing. Sometimes there Lawyers appear in Court once in three months or sometimes remain absent. We had requested the judge not to delay further but judge is adjourning the date of hearing . Kindly suggest me what can be the remedy for pressuring the Judge to hear the case and sentence order in single hearing.. Pls guide?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Your notice under regulation 49(ii) of derc supply code and performance standards regulations, 2007
REF REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST ID DATED JUL 2013 FOR REPRESENTATION AGAINST DISCONNECTED CA NO 6007XXXX -1.
DEAR SIR PLS NOTE MY REPLY IS BELOW
1.PLS NOTE CA NO 6007XXXXX1 IS NOT BELONGS TO ME IT IS BELONGS TO MR.XYZ K.NO 322XXXXX DDA FLAT NO XXX DELHI , PRESENTLY OWN BY 3RD OWNER.
2. PLS PROVIDE ME YOUR TEAM SITE REPORT TO STATING THAT MY LIVE CONNECTION 600XXXXXXX -2 IN MY NAME IS FEEDING SUPPLY WITH ALONG OTHER CONNECTION AT THIS SITE WITH PROOF OF PHOTO OF SITE.
3. PLS SEND YOUR VIGILANCE TEAM IN MY PRESENCE .
4. ALSO NOTE IF YOU WILL NOT TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PER MY BELOW MAIL AND REPLY OF THIS NOTICE I WILL TAKE UP FURTHER THIS MATTER WITH YOUR LOK ADA LAT AND CONSUMER COURT TO SENDING ME WRONG NOTICE WITHOUT ANY SUPPORTING PROOF.
5. I AM ALREADY REPLY YOUR ALL QUERY IN BELOW MAIL.
NOTE: CONSIDER THIS REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST.
.
SUB : REPLY OF YOUR NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007
REF : NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007 DATED 07.06.2013
Dear Sir
Ref to above mention sub and ref we have received this notice as on Jun 2013 by speed post. Pls note as per your notice TATA Power surveillance team carried out inspection of my premises with the view to ascertain the status of disconnected elec connection as mention below:
CA NO NAME ADDRESS DUES
6000XXXXXXX XYZ. XXX HOUSE E NO DELHI 32,010.00
Pls note this connection was allotted to XXX FLAT OWNER in year 1982 for the Elect supply of stair case of his House No XXX Delhi along with elect connection K.NO 322XXXXXXX.for HIS House NO XXX Flats Delhi
And also note there is no premises as NO A-Z Flat Delhi, as per allotment of DDA. So Above mention address is also wrong as per DDA allotment it should be Block H, House No.XXX City Delhi since this connection was allotted to MR.XYZ owner of House No XXX.
Pls no surveillance team has visited our premises and even they have not contact any family member during inspection neither hand over any notice or inspection report copy to us where we were present at our premises as on 6th Jun 2013. So this information provided to you is wrong and base less.
As per notice you have mention that against CA No 600YYYYY -2 in the name of ABC feeding supply of the aforesaid disconnected connection which is wrong and base less since this connection was for the supply to House No 5 stare case.
And more ever stair case light fitting was not working from last 20 years and already removed from stair case 20 years back by owner of House No XXX. And presently no elect fitting present from last 20 year in stair case attach with this connection C NO.6000XXXX - 1
Pls note we have not feeding supply of aforesaid disconnected connection or not supply through any unauthorized extension to this disconnected connection’s premises.
So we are here by requesting you windrow your this notice since we are not libel to pay this outstanding and we have not feeded any supply of this connection and also provide us inspection report.
Awaiting Your Early Reply.
DEAR EXPERT
MY QUERY IS AFTER SENDING ABOVE REPLY OF THEIR NOTICE STILL THEY ARE NOT AGREEING ON OUR REPLY AND DEMANDING TO PAY THIS DUES PLS LEGAL ADVISE ON THE SAME TO SETTLE DOWN THEIR NOTICE.ADVISE LE
Thanks And Regds