father executed settlement deed in his ancestral property to his daugther in the year of 2004, no son claim share in daughter(his sister) property, and he asked the relief for settlment deed is invalid under law. what remedy to daughter to save her property comes under settlement deed?
Prashanth
25 February 2014 at 16:46
Hi,
i wanted to know your view on my following issue.
i did purchased a site in a layout which has been approved by BDA, but the problem with my site is that it falls under CA area in the BDA plan and the society still went ahead and registered for its original member, later they had colluded with Revenue department and obtained the BDA katha as well and subequently sold it,i am the fourth owner, after BDA katha,subsequently BBMP katha had been issued and all relevant tax paid.subsequently i applied for house plan approval to BBMP and it also got approved.
so now my question is what will be my hold on this property? will i be able to fight it in court and legalise it?
or else what alternate options.
Please udpate me in detail on this.
thanks - prashanth
Member (Account Deleted)
25 February 2014 at 15:42
Ancestral Property
mohan
25 February 2014 at 14:45
there is a house in the name of lady build in gramanatham land.she has two daughters and one son who is dead before she died intestate.his two daughter filed a suit against her son's wife and his children.the house is in possession of her son's children. can they claim share in this house.as they were married before this house was bought by his son under his mother name.
soniya
25 February 2014 at 14:29
Dear and respective members,
My one case is pending at small causes court at evidence stage wherein the obstructionist who is a company has filed his evidence along with documents and the said documents were exhibited by the hon'ble court. But now the said obstructionist company wanted to replace earlier witness (director) with a new witness (another director of same company) by filing fresh affidavit. By filing fresh evidence of new witness he has made an application to the HOn'ble court that continuation of the earlier order passed on proof and admissibility of the documents passed by ld. predecessor of this court on the documents filed along with earlier witness no.1.
my query is that after the exit of said witness from the present case the order passed in the light of the evidence of said witness on the documents filed alongwith his evidence affidavit can survive any more? in my case the hon'ble court has rejected the application for holding good evidence given by the earlier witness and also the exhibited documents. Further directed to file fresh evidence along with fresh document and again exhibit the document with that new witness.
Now the aggrieved from the abvoe said order the other side has filed revision against said order. now it is pending for adjudication.
Will any member help me out with any citation to that effect that he has to file fresh evidence along with fresh exhibiting. i tried alot but could not find it. Please help me.
Thanks and regards.
Advocate Soniya.
soniya
25 February 2014 at 14:19
Dear and respective members,
My one case is pending at small causes court at evidence stage wherein the obstructionist who is a company has filed his evidence along with documents and the said documents were exhibited by the hon'ble court. But now the said obstructionist company wanted to replace earlier witness (director) with a new witness (another director of same company) by filing fresh affidavit. By filing fresh evidence of new witness he has made an application to the HOn'ble court that continuation of the earlier order passed on proof and admissibility of the documents passed by ld. predecessor of this court on the documents filed along with earlier witness no.1.
my query is that after the exit of said witness from the present case the order passed in the light of the evidence of said witness on the documents filed alongwith his evidence affidavit can survive any more? in my case the hon'ble court has rejected the application for holding good evidence given by the earlier witness and also the exhibited documents. Further directed to file fresh evidence along with fresh document and again exhibit the document with that new witness.
Now the aggrieved from the abvoe said order the other side has filed revision against said order. now it is pending for adjudication.
Will any member help me out with any citation to that effect that he has to file fresh evidence along with fresh exhibiting. i tried alot but could not find it. Please help me.
Thanks and regards.
Advocate Soniya.
sk..........
25 February 2014 at 10:45
neighbours plan/map of plot is forged or fake,
now can I file police complaint, does this come under police case.
will police investigate
respected members,
a civil suit for declaration was filed in the year 2003 by plaintiffs against defendant No.1 to 8 when the case was fixed for defendants evidence, i become the party as defendant no. 9 10 and 11 in the year 2013. now i have filed written statement and want to cross examine the plaintiff witnesses being newly added party. Judge saab asked me for law. kindly help me.
Rajesh Sivadas
24 February 2014 at 18:33
Hi,
My Name is Rajesh Sivadas. I am writing to you as i am a victim of harassment by a debt collection agency in Mumbai.
I was unable to pay my debt due to financial problems and family obligations. I am homeless and have taken shelter with my sister with my nine month old son and wife. I have been getting phone calls from this agency in Mumbai. They want me to settle the PL account and have offered me a pay off for rupees 34100. With zero income i asked them to give me some time to arrange for the funds or to allow me to pay that in twelve installments. they are not willing to work with me and are calling my in-laws and harassing them.
This is now giving me family problems and i am going through depression. I have lost my job and am not able to find one as i am not well educated.
Please suggest what i need to do.
Regards,
Rajesh Sivadas
9545328811
Partition
father partitioned his ancestral properties with his only son and without knowledge of his only daughter in the year of 2000, daughter entitled what share in the above properties? Partition deed father and son valid one?
What relief for daughter?