Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 20:56
Sir,
I am a retired govt.servent. due to my family circumstances i barrowed some loan from my friend 15 years ago.For that amount he urged me a collasteral security.I am from a poor dalit family.I got nothing to give him as cooasteral security.
While I am in service I purchased a house from TNHB by availing Govt.Loan.For that Loan amount I pledged the house to the Govt.He urged me a sale agreement on that hose with possesion rights and loan amount
shown as advance amount for the house.
At that time the owner ship title is not in my name becaus i pledged the house to govt.house loan.
He is a millioner.He muscular,men,money
and politicl supports.I cant do anything
against him.I made an agreement with my own
handwriting in Rs.10/stamp paper.It was not regestered.After that i repay the amount and asked to return back the agreement.He has not given receipt for that amount and that has adjusted towards intrest.
He simply told that i was sold the house
to him.I was shocked and file a suit against him.After receiving court notice
by forcfully vaccated me from my house and dumped rowdies and gundas in my house.
I send complaints to the police.But no action is taken against him.
I request the learned councils please do
help me to give technical advises,relevent Laws and Higher courts Judgements supporting my suit.
sincerely,
R.Madanagopal
s.loganathan
11 October 2010 at 20:36
I am placing relevance to RBI guidelines on 'Prudential Norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification & Provisioning Pertaining to Advances'
extract:
4.2.4 Upgradation of loan accounts classified as NPAs
If arreas of interest and principal are paid by the borrower in the case of accounts classified as NPAs, the accounts should no longer be treated as non-perfofming and may be classified as 'standard' accounts.....
My account was declared NPA and I made subsequent payments to sevice the interest in full and brought the outstanding within the sanctioned limits. Should my account be classified as sub-standard and no longer be treated as non-performing? Or would it be right for the Bank to keep it as NPA?
Sunlawseeker
11 October 2010 at 20:21
Dear Advocate(s) !
In, Tamil Nadu, in the year of 1977,Kanchipuram District, Patta allotted for 3 survey numbers in the year of 1977 based on abolishment of Inam.
The person who got patta as per above encroached lands besides the lands allocated to him.
That village people are fighting against it till 1985. But, still today continues.
What would be the remedy to them?
Experts! Please advice.
Thanking you
V.Sundaresan
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 17:49
My father died 3 months back and he did not write will for his land. If we want to sell this land later what should we do?
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 15:48
Dear All,
During the pendency of the Arbitral proceedings due to personal reasons if the Umpire/Presiding Arbitrator is unable to continue with the proceedings then what is the way out - again the Arbitrators will decide about the new Umpire/Presiding Arbitrators or the parties have to approach the Hon'ble Court to get the same appointed.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Anonymous
sushil bhatt
11 October 2010 at 12:00
Dear All
Can you pls provide me any fresh case law (2009 or 2010) of Apex Court pertaining to cases where injunction given against invocation of bank guarantee is vacated by the Apex court.
Sasmita
11 October 2010 at 11:09
Hi,
I have taken a property through POAand it is registered in sub register office.
As registration is not opened, it can n't be registered.
I want to check is this power of attorney can be revoked without my notice?
As no expiry date not there, is there any time limit of expiration of POA?
Is that POA will retain even after the death of owner(principal)
Please let me know all details.
thanks in Advance
Sasmita
yogesh
11 October 2010 at 00:09
Sir,
In Delhi High Court, the process fees along with Registration Charges are admissible if the writ petitioner wants to service the notice to the respondent like district Courts of delhi?
or
Only Rs 3/- fees is maintainable for service of notice which has to be affixed on the process fees form?
Abdul Latheef
10 October 2010 at 21:50
Respected Lawyers,
My aunt has a piece of land in her village; The same village is governed by Town Panchayat. The land is classified as punja and has no passage since the entry part of the land has three small encroachments of huts. The encroachments were made on Poramboke land and partially in my aunts place too. Further they are living in the huts for more than 30 years. Being the same is classified under road poramboke the encroachers have not given Patta as per the Tamil Nadu Govt. Order.
We have no access from any angle to get into the land. So we sent a letter from through our advocate on 1/8/2010 to The Exec. Officer, Town Panchayat/The President, Town Panchayat/The Tahsildhar/The District Collector stating that we have no access from any angle to get into the land and also the encroacher are causing nuisance to adjacent school going girl students in the view of getting directions from Honorable High Court.
We have received a reply on 04/10/2010 that encroacher who live there doesn't create any nuisance further there is no hindrance to the complainant. Also whenever the same poromboke land requires to panchayat, they will vacate the same with the help of revenue and police officials.
The reply from the EO is totally false ie., not even a single foot of passage access is available. The only reason behind those statements is the encroachers are close relative of President and they have rented the huts and causing nuisance to us.
How to prove the false statement of EO legally?
Who is the competent authority to certify that there is no passage access ?
How to get the encroacher evicted?
Please guide us on the same.
Regards,
Abdul Latheef.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Case pending in the hon. supreme court of india
sir,
is there any way of finding approximately when my retiral benefits case 'kewal singh paneser vs. p.a.u.' number CD 12047/2004 will come up for hearing in the hon. supreme court of india.