Pravin Desai
16 December 2008 at 18:31
looking for a lawyer in Paradeep, Orissa dealing in maritime law any one interested please contact
rajendra
16 December 2008 at 16:09
MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING ACT 1966, has come in force with effect from 01/10/2005 (in the ahmednagar region)but officially the collector communicate the same to the village panchayat in the year 2007.
Village panchayat has sanctioned so many building plans after 01/10/05, but not after 2007.
what will be the effect?
whether the sanctioned is valid and legal?
tahasildar asking for re-sanction the plan from town planninga authorities?
Rohit Garodia
15 December 2008 at 19:23
Whether by refraining from filing Memorandum, the existing Micro and Small units holding a SSI registration will lose the benefits under MSME Act?
If so, what recouse can they take with respect to delayed payments
R P KANGANE
15 December 2008 at 15:44
Hi
I have one query relating to motor accident. Case is :
Five boys studying in 10th Std. It was sunday when parents were not at home. They came together at one of the friends house and decided to go out for buying some study material. They took the vehicle. One of the boy was knowing driving but he was not having valid license. The boy who was driving vehicle has lost the control over car and met with an accident wherein two boys were died on the spot and other three injured.
In this case, what are the legal implications. Who is responsible and what are the complications.
Please give your valuable comments on this.
Regards
J K Agrawal
14 December 2008 at 10:29
My question is 'Should an advocate not represent on behalf of Kasab ?"
"Advocate Dinesh Mota who was asked by the Maharashtra legal aid to take up Kasab's case has refused to do so. Speaking to the media persons he said, “I was asked to take up Kasab’s case by the Maharashtra legal aid. But I refused to do so,” he said.
Mumbai attack accused, Mohammedd Ajmal Kasab has been in police custody since November 27. Ajmal was arrested from Girgaum Chowpatty while his associate Ismail Khan was killed in a police encounter on the fateful night of 26/11 attacks.
Ajmal and Ismail had killed 55 commuters at CST and three senior police officers, including Maharashtra ATS Chief Hemant Karkare.
Ajmal has been charged with murder, attempt to murder and conspiracy. Ajmal is being tried in 12 cases in the Mumbai terror attacks."
kanwar Lal
13 December 2008 at 19:03
award passed by the arbitrator in mumbai.immovable
property of the customer situated at ludhiana( punjab )can we file execution before the honable court at ludhiana.
SUMIT
12 December 2008 at 16:16
I am a petitioner and i am a IPS officer in uttar pradesh.My promotion is due but they denied my promotion on the basis of only one missing annual confidential report.well i just want to know is there any supreme court judgement in my favour?? what should i do in that case???
CHIRAG SAWANT
11 December 2008 at 08:45
TO,
Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil,
The President of India.
SUB:- 1) Presentation and Submission of “SECRET and CRUCIAL DOCUMENTS” for removing / curing “VERY VERY SERIOUS ERRORS AND DEFICIENCIES IN THE WHOLE SYSTEM OF EDUCATION” which, if Not Removed / Cured IMMEDIATELY Now, will prove FATALISTIC to India, Only to The President of India.
2) Request to come ONLINE Immediately using Web-cam Technology for Atleast 20 mins in the Presence of All Media (Print and Electronic), on my side only, for the above given subject and complete the Transaction FULLY.
__________________________________________
I have sent the Above given Application on 29/09/2008 and is recd. by them. Now, i would like to know whether:-
1) The Application is Proper, Myself being a Citizen of India and a Senior Student of The ICAI??
2) Does it requires any Alteration??
KINDLY NOTE:- The Content of the Matter being HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL will not be Disclosed to Anyone, whom so ever it may concern and it will be Handed Over Only to The President of India.
Raghavendra
09 December 2008 at 20:18
SUPPOSE B HAS ADVANCED CERTAIN SUM MONEY TO Z,THROUGH A CHEQUE,AS A LOAN,WITHOUT ANY DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE AT 1%RATE OF INTEREST PER MONTH.AND B MAKES NOTE OF SAME IN HIS DIARY, AFTER EXPIREY OF ONE YEAR,BOTH PRINCIPAL AND MONTHLY INTEREST OF THE AMOUNT ADVANCED ARE DUE FROM Z,WHICH HAS BEEN ALSO RECORDED BY B IN HIS DIRAY .AFTER SOME TIME BOTH B AND Z HAVE EXPIRED. AND Z'S SON AGREES TO PAY ONLY HALF OF THE AMOUNT ADVANCED TO B's SON THROUGH A CHEQUE. AND DISAGREES TO PAY REST OF AMOUNT .CAN B's SON SUE Z's SON FOR REST OF THE AMOUNT .ON THE BASIS OF ENTRIES MADE IN B's DIARY AND ALSO CHEQUE CLEARED IN A'PASS BOOK OR BANK ENTRY UNDER INDIAN CONTRACT ACT .AND WHETHER DIARY IS VALUABLE EVIDENCE UNDER SEC 34 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT ,ACCOMPANIED BY ENTRY IN THE PASS BOOK . PLEACE GIVE REASONS FOR YOU ANSWERS
THANK YOU
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
accidental claim
respected sir
i filed a motor vehicle original petition before the court againist the vehicle owner and insurance company including the wife of the deceased as the respondents. in this case, prior to the accident, the wife of the deceased got "Khula divorce" from her husband as per the muslim customs. my question is whether a divorced wife can claim the compensation from the court under the provisions of motor vehicle act