UMANG
30 October 2015 at 22:22
My employer put FTCs in place for half the staff 2 yrs ago. They have recently run out, expired. They didnt send letters or speak about it to anyone until just recently when news travelled that our contracts wont be renewed until April. We are all at different start times obviously and Im one of the longer serving. I should by this time no longer be given fixed term having by April exceeded the 4 yr limit.
So what we have is FTCs for 2 consecutive years then nothing for 6 mths only a verbal contract then there will be a written and possibly for some the restart of fixed term?? Has the laws changed recently?
gajendra soni
06 October 2015 at 08:43
हाइकोर्ट में विगत ७ साल से सस्पेंशन और अनिवार्य सेवानिवृती का केस लंबित है जिसमे कोई भी वित्तीय अनिमियता का चार्ज नहीं है इस बीच अपील करनी वाले की डेथ हो गयी जबकि विभाग में पेंशन योजना नहीं है और न ही अनुकम्पा नियुक्ति. जबकि अपील में केवल अनिवार्य सेवानिवृती को समाप्त कर वापस सर्विस में रखने का अनुरोघ है / क्या वारिसान उसी रिट को आगे बड़ा सकते है जिसमे सस्पेंशन से अब तक के मुवायजे की मांग व अपील करने वाले के साथ हुए अन्याय के लिए न्याय की मांग की जा सकती है क्या इसके लिए डेथ के बाद कोई रिट लिमिटेशन है या पुराने केस के डेट आने पर नया अनुरोघ की माग की जा सकती है या नया रिट डालना पड़ेगा जवाब हिंदी या इंग्लिश दोनों में दिया जा सकता है
DHARAMVIR SINGH
19 September 2015 at 17:22
I am MBA + 6 years of experience in financial industry and recently have completed LL.B, As I have taken Advice from advocate they say give your one year time in session court and then look go to high court or become legal adviser. I can understand Hindi but bad in writing Hindi language but can write and can speak better in English. what should I Do. which stream to take. need your advice so that it might help me in taking the decision.
Anuragg Pandey
04 September 2015 at 17:00
Dear Experts,
I want to know that reportable judgments are published in different magazines. Can I publish non-reportable judgments in online magazine if so do I need any permission from any authority.
Thanks and Regards
amit kumar
19 August 2015 at 17:08
Respected experts,
Bank has issued notice under sec 13(2) and possession was taken as per section 13(4).6 different property was mortgaged to bank but in notice only one property was mentioned and bank took symbolic possession of only that plot.all six plot are adjacently located .bank is not sure about the demarcation of the property taken in possession.Borrower has appealed in DRT against this action.my query in instead of all 6 property if only one is mentioned in notice is the notice defective in nature.
Awaiting response
regards
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Breach of peace under sec 144 and 145 at sdo court
Civil Litigation of land under Sec-144 & 145 at SDO Court,Dhanbad
My father purchased 72 decimals of land from all sellers at Govindpur,Dhanbad in 1967.He did the required mutation with rent receipt in 1969.Thereafter, with all sale deeds,mutation and continuous rent receipt,he was in the possession of land till 2005,when one of the heirs of the sellers approached and proclaimed that few more shares of sellers are pending and said those few sellers are going to take their possession of the land at earliest and endeavoured to create a boundary wall on the empty land.
So.out of panic my father lodge injunction n Sec-144 in the SDO Court of Don the said land in 2005 hanbad in 2005 which later converted into Sec 145.In the mean time,my rent receipt also stopped because the Anchal office record of the "Jamabandi"or rent receipt account book at Karamchari office perished n torn out. All the way for ten years till 2015 there were numerous hearings,witnesses,arguments,evidences from both sides during the case.Also during the case the sellers heirs forcefully ploughed the land during the trial n hearing of the case,for which I reported to the court under Sec 146..The enquiry report of the police states that the sellers heirs ,the opposite party in the case who have already sold the land have forcefully & whimsically ploughed and cultivated the land.And finally sooner or later to my astonishment ,when the Circle Officer of the land also sends the inquiry report of the disputed land property in favour of the sellers heirs i.e the opposite party as the current possessor of the land,though the sale deeds,mutation n rent receipts are accepted & intact on our side.The case is sub judice and the order may soon happen on either side towards possession of the land.
Kindly advise and suggest a proper course of action at earliest.
Vinod Kumar
Ishwar Dayal Dubey,Dhanbad
M-9334547596