RAKESH MEHRA
24 December 2009 at 11:23
Raj Kumar Ji
i have asked given below ques:-
CAN U SUGGEST ME ABOUT AMENDMENT IN VAT REGISERTAION UNDER PUNJAB ACT.
WE ARE RUNNING THE BUSINESS AT 13, GADAIPUR, JALANDHAR.BECAUSE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN VAT REGISERTATION GADAIPUR, JALANDHAR.
NOW WE ARE ALSO RUNNING THE BUSINESS AT FOCAL POINT, JALANDHAR.
CAN VAT NUMBER HAVE TWO ADDRESSES UNDER PUNJAB ACT.
IF HAVE THEN SALES INVOICE IS TO BE ISSUED AT BOTH ADDRESSES
PLZEPLY......................./
Answered by you
Visit the following link for satisfaction of your quarry:
http://salestax.indlaw.com/vat/Db.aspx?SID=22
Raj Kumar ji
i have opened the given above site but my query is not solved
plz sir clear my query
Parveen Kr. Aggarwal
20 December 2009 at 01:09
I need latest case law on recording of evidence through Video-conferencing. I request you to help me in getting the latests Judgments on the point.
nagesh
19 December 2009 at 14:43
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please upload the judgement of "Justice Mridula Mishra passed the order after hearing writ petitions filed by teachers of various universities and colleges in Bihar. Mishra directed the state government to raise the retirement age limit in conformity with the orders of UGC." made on 6th October 2009 as reported below:
http://jaibihar.com/hc-directs-govt-to-raise-retirement-age-of-college-teachers/13046/
I tried to access through website of HC of patna,but it asks for some authetincation code. I request my lawyer friends to help me in getting this order copy. You can send to my mail: nageshds@yahoo.com
Thanks
R.Manivasagan
26 August 2009 at 22:22
Sir, we came to know that the Honb'le Supreme Court of India, has cinfimred the findings of the Honb'le High Court of Judicature at Madras that the Decree obtained without studiying S.S.L.C or +2 is not valid.
what about it's scope, whether it will affect the practising Advocate who comes in this categery.
there are 6 Advoactes in our Bar. pleased
Member Strength 9,47,972 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 284 of Companies Act 1956
Can any one explain me the meaning the following Sub section 284(7) (Removal of Director) of Companies Act 1956.
(7) Nothing in this section shall be taken -
(a) as depriving a person removed there under of any compensation or damages payable to him in respect of the termination of his appointment as director or of any appointment terminating with that as director; or
(b) as derogating from any power to remove a director which may exist apart from this section.