Balaji Bakthavathsal
17 March 2013 at 17:53
Respected Learned Lawyers,
I came across a news paper article which stated that when an immovable property gifted to a person, the recipient can NOT sell the property till his life time and only his/her successors can sell. Is it correct and mentioned so in the Gift Deed Act ?
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
mukesh
17 March 2013 at 17:11
Sir,
I would like to know who has the authority and responsibility about PRB ACT 1867?
Generally RNI Delhi verify, register, and control the Newspapers in india according to
PRB ACT 1867.At local level a DM or SDM verify papers of applicant and sent the papers to RNI. A declaration from publisher and printer must be authorized by DM or SDM.
Now my question is if a newspaper is running without registration who will take action against it under PRB ACT ?
In my case SDM says me, Police will take action and take the matters to court after registering the FIR.
Police says if SDM orders they will obey.Both sends ball to eachother's court. What should I do?
angeristrue
17 March 2013 at 14:22
I got a job offer from an IT company and due to illness after two months i was hospitalised..i couldn inform through phone and mailed the manager and HR that i couldn come to office and am not well..but frm the head quarters they sent me 3 letters to join immediately.my HR didnt say anything about my illness but i informed her abt the letter but they blocked my employee mail access. its been 7months. the bond is for 18 months and can i ask them that i need the job? they have sent me letter that i should pay the bond which i signed when i joined the company. pls advise me wat to do
Yeshwant
17 March 2013 at 12:31
Hi,
We have filed a case and send notice to the opposite party. it has been 2 years, we haven't received any reply.
And we have send three to four times reminder to the party.
Can anyone tell, what should we do now, regarding the case?
Case is about the property "cancellation of sale deed"
Note: Case is in Uttar pradesh, Gazipur district.
Regards,
Yeshwant Gupta.
Pranav Parmar
16 March 2013 at 23:08
sir how can i continue discussion with expert.generally when i ask a query then expert give me suggestion then i again ask something regarding that query then i do not get any reply why
Shumaila Altaf
16 March 2013 at 19:23
on &th july 2013 I bought a discount card,offering 9 services of a reputed salon for Rs.1000, from some agent. The card was valid for 1 year from the date of issuance which means the validity of my card ends on 7th july 2013. In december I availed two services(through prior appointment). Now I called them again today 16th march 2013 to book an appointment for monday only to hear that they no longer entertain the card. The owner of salon says that they never issued any card and in fact it was some was some fraud advertising company which was selling the cards in their name and that they even filed an FIR against them. But when i asked that how did they provide services previously if the cards were not issued by them, he said that it was only on humanitarian grounds and they didn't want their customers(who had purchased the card) to suffer.I even asked him that did they caution their customers through newspapers etc. not to buy such cards. he simply said No.I still have seven services left and i don't know what to do.
v rao tangudu
16 March 2013 at 18:24
please clarify whether the educational institutions are come under consumer protection act can a student claim against the college
varadagrawal
16 March 2013 at 10:52
there was a Company which changed its registered office in the year 2010(the property belonged to a CA and he himself certified Form 18). But he is saying that in the year 2011 he asked the Company to vacate the property(but there is no notice served upon the Company) and he has issued a letter regarding the same in 2012(June 2012)to the MCA. Thereafter the Company changed its registered office in August 2012. Now the MCA has raised 2 objections-
1. that the Company has used the property since 2011 without the consent of the CA
2. the Company did not Complied the provisions of Section 146 of the Companies Act, 1956 as it shall have informed the change of registered office that it did in August 2012 within 30 days.
This is a very important matter. Please reply.
Regards,
CS Varad Agrawal
Mukul
16 March 2013 at 07:50
I have got to get a service matter resolved. I am serving the air force and postd in jorhat. Any learned advocates, if could help filing the matter in the AFT GUWAHATI?. I hv got vry less tym. Plz reply wid ur phn numbr. Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maharashtra housing coop. society act 1960
In our society one person selling his flat, Buyers are two friends and their wives. the flat is one bed room hall kitchen small flat. can two couple/ friends (unrelated) can buy? can M C take objection on it?