LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Jayesh   11 March 2010 at 14:45

Interception of mobile

My wife had a affair with my friend. I have filed a divorce case. My friend planted spyware into my and my wife's mobile. he heared all our communication. under which law this is an offence and what should i do to get mobile print out of my friend, myself and my wife.

PV RANGAIAH   11 March 2010 at 13:54

FELLING OF TREES IN LARGE SCALE IN TAMILNADU

Whether felling of trees in large scale is permitted in Tamilnadu. If yes, what are the procedure to be followed and documents to be furnished and fees payable, to whom to send the application for permission?

SANJIV KUMAR   11 March 2010 at 11:34

related to will

After death of my father, my brother has filed a declaration suit in civil court by producing the will of our father. He has not gone for probate. Is the civil court has power to process the case.

Adv. karinamishra   11 March 2010 at 00:43

general

The public sector company is not fulfiling the vacancies of Ex-serviceman as per GR . I want to serve them notice on the said subject. what is the format of notice?
Plz send me the specimen.

Parthasarathi Loganathan   10 March 2010 at 20:14

Anand's Apology to Apex Court

HOPE ALL OUR LEARNED BRETHREN MUST TAKE A CUE FROM THIS NEWS ITEM:

BMW CASE

Fearing more action, Anand says sorry to SC


Once a prominent criminal law practitioner and now stripped of his senior advocate designation after being convicted of trying to influence a prosecution witness in the infamous BMW hit-and-run case on the basis of a television sting operation, lawyer R K Anand has given up the fight to restore his honour, and apologised to the Supreme Court.

The tendering of apology and appealing for mercy by Anand came in response to a notice from the apex court to him on July 29 last year asking why the lenient punishment — banning him from practising in the Delhi High Court and its suborddinate courts for four months and a fine of Rs 2,000 — be not enhanced to make it commensurate with the gravity of his misconduct.

The SC had on July 29 said Anand’s offence was “grave” for which the punishment should be stringent than the “lenient” sentence given by the HC and had asked him to show cause why the punishment be not enhanced.

“The action of Anand in trying to suborn the court witness in a criminal trial was reprehensible enough but his conduct before the HC aggravates the matter manifold. He does not show any remorse for his gross misdemeanour and instead tries to take on the HC by defying its authority,” the Supreme Court had said while terming the punishment given to him by HC as “wholly inadequate and incommensurate to the seriousness of his
actions and conduct”.

Faced with the uneasy prospect of getting a higher punishment, Anand in his response tendered “sincere and unqualified apology” for all the acts alleged against him virtually accepting the guilt. He also withdrew insinuations against one of the high court judges who took the decision against him.

Anand said the infamy already inflicted on him through the HC and SC verdicts was punishment enough. The HC had convicted him on August 21, 2008.

VIEWS :

That is the power of Justice, Equity and Good Conscience.

Anonymous   10 March 2010 at 18:00

Why Should Anybody be afraid of Jail?

Que.1.In Our Legal System the Ultimate Judgement in any Case whether it is Civil or Criminal is Jail, then why should anybody be afraid of Jail, Because Payroll system is also that supportive in India?

RAJENDRA   10 March 2010 at 16:52

Commercial vehicle insurance claim

claim application rejected on reason that
Driver doesent hold a valid driving licence at the time of accident
attach herewith

1. Driver licence

Please advice

Thanking you

Chintan Shah   10 March 2010 at 13:09

Inheritence of property

Dear collegues,

Mr. X's mother has some land and a flat to her name. There are also some loans and advances that she has given to her relatives. X's mother dies. X has a sister who is married. X's mother doesnot have a will. In this case who will inherit the property and in what share? What is the procedure to be followed for the same? Will the court appoint administrator or executor for the property of X's mother? Or can X himself become the executor?

The second question is a modification to the above:

If X is the only heir, is it necessary to get an order of the court to inherit the property or is it automatically inherited?

I am completely new to the field so please donot mind my doubts... And please do explain in detail..

Thanks in advance,

Chintan

sushil bhatt   10 March 2010 at 11:57

Arbitration matter

Dear All

Can a sole arbitrator ask the parties to file an affidavit in respect of admission/denial of documents. As per my knowledge, the parties can only file an affidavit before a court only and the arbitrator/arb. tribunal is not a court.

pls advise.

Anonymous   10 March 2010 at 09:42

refund

SIR I AM HAVING TWO FIX DEPOSITS AMOUNTING RS 30,000/- AS TAX SAVER DEPOSIT IN PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK NOW I WANT TO BREAK THE DEPOSIT SO THAT I COULD GET PROPER TREATMENT OF MY DIABATIC FOOT WHAT SHOULD I DO.