Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 23:29
I am working for a company in Mumbai. If my predecessor who was looking after litigation under 138 has left the company half way during the cross, am I required as per law to be crossed from the beginning or continue from where my predecessor left.
Chandan Garg
28 April 2010 at 10:01
Situation is : A public hearing was conducted for environment clearance. In the middle due to rage of villagers , lathi charge held.
adm orally said i am setting aside the public hearing , but again started without leaving his seat.
Whether this amount to set aside or not.
what affidavit should the ADM and RO give to Appellate tribunal??
Shweta Bharti
28 April 2010 at 09:33
Hello
I am not a practising lawyer, though have completed my LLB degree in 2007,Law Centre 2, New Delhi.
Now I want to register myself as a lawyer.
Please help me with the procedure and Fees. From where should I start?
Thanking you
Shweta Bharti
shweta.bharti@hotmail.com
arun bansal
28 April 2010 at 00:31
any time bound provision in RTI act for appeal heard by CIC. if not reply or heard whitin 6 month of fillng of second appeal before CIC
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 20:42
dear sir
thanks sir for the previous reply .according to ur ans
it means thatbail under section 66 of information tech act is possible its not an non-bailable offence?
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 19:33
sir/madam
how to get bail under section 66 of information tech act...somewhere it is written that it is non-bailable offence..but whats the procedure or way to get bail under it
reply soon plz
shabbir boltwala
27 April 2010 at 13:16
we are buisness premises co op society. our bldg is built prior to 1949, a builder converted this building to small offices n sold it1984. the society was formed with 34 members in 1984.
member A took loan frm bank of india in 2000 and his premises was liened to bank as per member requst n regisrer in so. books.
as he failed to pay the loan amount to bank, bank filed suit in DRT1for recovery of bank dues.
the member was also not paing society dues, and society was informing/demanding the maitance charges from bank.
society filed recovery proceeding in coop court in 2004 and obtained order for recovery in 2008.
in meantime bank case with DRT WAS ON, IN BETWEEN BANK by private treaty sold the premises to an advocatein 2007, who happened to be on ther panel, and did repsent before drt in this case.soc was not awre of private traty sale.on knowing soc filed applic in DRT which was rejected.
socity recovery certificate tme member prmises was sealed by recovery officer, on serving auction notice ,advocate filed objection with recovery officer saying he is in possession by virtu of private traty sale.
i want to know in above cirumstaces can the rcovery officer procced with auction as per recovery certificate or not.
socity recovery
amardeep
27 April 2010 at 12:49
Dear Friends,
Kindly Forward me Power point Presentation on charges Under 125 to 141 of the companies on my mail ID anupamchadar@rediffmail.com urgently required.
Thanks and Regards
Amardeep
Naveen Chand Kumawatt
25 April 2010 at 17:06
Is the Right to Information Act,2005 is applicable on private institutions like coaching centres or nursing homes?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maharashtra Co-op Scty Act 1960
It is imcumbent upon the members to execute indemnity bond as soon as the committe is formed. Can all the members together execute one indemnity for the society to save society's expenses. Has any such matter referred before the Co-op Court or High Court. Can I receive some citation on this matter.
Thanks