Dear Sir,
Landlord was issuing rent reciept on both brother name jointly since 1967 to 1990 afte1990's he issued on one single name,
now in 2018 he was ready to issue separate rent receipt on second brother whose name was not mentioned after 1990,
So in 2018 this new rent reciept will be valid , or pagadi system is valid as land lord issue new rent receipt ?,
Transfer charges demand by landlord is also valid ?
Pls advice...
Dear Experts,
Kindly help me in the below case. I would like to know the possibility to succeed in this case as my uncle "X" got cheated by others.
“X” having an agricultural land in AP and given it for 25 years lease to “Y”, effective from Oct-1993, for a fixed lease consideration of Rs.25,000/-. The same was executed on an unregistered non judicial stamp paper.
In the year 2007, “X” lost all his original property documents and complained to local police and “X” having search certificate/endorsement from police. The same thing “X” conveyed to “Y” and requested for new agreement with him. “Y” promised to “X” that no need of any new agreement and he will handover property after completion of 25 years (i.e. on Oct-2018). By trusting “Y” promise “X” kept quite till now.
Now it is shock to “X” that “Y” got illegal revenue mutation of property without having registered sale deed (title deed) and denied to handover lease property to “X” saying that the same property belongs him since he is in adverse possession more than 12 years (which is part of lease period).
Now, what is the remedies “X” having to get back his property from “Y”?
What is the way to file a case on “Y” for breach of trust, mischief and cheating?
Dear Experts,
Kindly help me in the below case. I would like to know the possibility to succeed in this case as my father "B" got cheated by others.
In a sale deed dated June 1992, “A” & “B” sold agriculture lands bearing survey no.1,2,4 to “C”. None of the sellers have legal rights to sell on survey no.4. “C” wrongly mentioned survey no.3 boundaries to survey no.4 and got it registered with Sub-Registrar (actually survey no.3 is “B”s property and he is not willing to sell it).
From 1983 to upto date (around 35years) “B” having EC on his name for survey no.3 along with sale deed. But “C” is having illegal possession and mutation without a sale deed (title deed).
Now Can “B” file a suit for possession, mutation and permanent injunction against “C”? Kindly guide me the necessary steps and provisions under law. Thank you.
Dear Experts,
Kindly help me in the below case. I would like to know the possibility to succeed in this case a my father "B" got cheated by others.
In a sale deed dated June 1992, “A” & “B” sold agriculture lands bearing survey no.1,2,4 to “C”. None of the sellers have legal rights to sell on survey no.4. “C” wrongly mentioned survey no.3 boundaries to survey no.4 and got it registered with Sub-Registrar (actually survey no.3 is “B” property and he is not willing to sell it). “A” ex-owner of the property completely received consideration for this sale, and the same mentioned in sale deed.
Now, Can “B” file a suit for NULL & VOID Contract case for entire sale deed which got registered in favor of “C” (i.e. for survey no.1, 2 and 4) in the year 1992 (around 26 years now), based on the ground that no consideration received by “B”, and “A” have no legal rights to sign the sale deed as 1st party seller & to receive entire sale consideration alone from “C”? If yes/no, under which Act & Sections/Provisions?
Deleted due to duplicate thread.
Deleted due to duplicate thread.
duplicate thread, deleted.
dear sir
i have one old flat.. i want to sale this ..
but in our flat scheme.. any member does not have sale deed. major member at time of booking only pay some amount and balance on monthly installment.
after 20 year.. still we didi not get dastavje. or proerpty document. builder died.. not contactable..
now i want to sale this ,, but due to loan not possible and no document, i can not able to sale proerply
so plz help in this issue..
Dear Experts,
Kindly suggest me your opinion in the below case. I would like to know the merit of "B". Thank you.
CASE HISTORY :
“A” sold immovable property of agricultural land survey no. 1, 2 and 3 to “B” through a valid registered sale deed in the year of 1983, in the state of Andhra Pradesh.
Later on 1991, by undue threaten force by “A”, “B” agreed to sell the same immovable property to “C” (by threaten of “A” & “C” together). While drafting the sale deed “C” dictated the document writer to mention survey numbers as 1, 2 and 4 (mentioned no.4 instead of actual no.3), and full sale consideration was received by “A” (third party) and the same sale deed was registered with SRO, by signing “A” as 1st party seller & “B” as 2nd parity seller.
FACTS OF CASE :
1. While drafting sale deed, “C” mentioned “A” as first party to the sale deed, signed and registered document accordingly. “B” (legal owner) also signed on registered sale deed as 2nd party.
2. As per registered sale deed, complete consideration received by “A” (ex-owner alone), a third party where he has no legal rights on property.
3. In the said sale deed, none of the sellers have legal rights to sell on survey no.4. “C” wrongly mentioned survey no.3 boundaries to survey no.4 and got it registered with Sub-Registrar (survey no.3 not sold).
4. By fabricating documents and bribing to Tahsildhar office staff, “C” got mutation on survey no.3 (which is not legally sold & not registered in favor of “C”) instead of survey no.4.
5. From 1983 to upto date “B” having EC on his name for survey no.3 along with sale deed. But “C” is having illegal possession of the immovable property.
6. Tahsildhar office staff given endorsement to “B” to approach Civil Court when “B” applied for mutation & pattadar passbook on his favor for survey no.3 (which is illegally recorded on “C” name in revenue records now).
7. With corruption, “C” got mutation and pattadhar pass book from Tahsildhar office without having registered sale deed / title deed for survey no.3.
8. Tahsildhar not verifying the title documents and not doing legal act. He simply endorsing “B” to file a civil suit on “C”. They have given illegal mutation & pattadhar passbook to “C”, by considering “C”s illegal possession.
NOW THE QUESTIONS ARE :
a) Can “B” file a suit for NULL & VOID Contract case for entire sale deed which got registered in favor of “C” (i.e. for survey no.1, 2 and 4) in the year 1991 (around 26 years now), based on the ground that no consideration received by “B”, and “A” have no legal rights to sign the sale deed as 1st party seller & to receive entire sale consideration alone from “C”? If yes/no, under which Act & Sections/Provisions?
b) Can “B” file a case to get transfer mutation & pattadhar passbook in his favor for survey no.3 for which he have update of EC & sale deed in his favor (after 35 years from the date of registration)? If yes/no, under which Act & Sections/Provisions?
c) Can “B” file a private complaint to get the property into his possession which is almost 26years under illegal possession of “C”? If yes/no, under which Act & Sections/Provisions?
d) Is there any supporting case laws for all of the above situations?
e) Is there any other legal remedies in this case in favour of “B”?.
Civil Property
Dear Sir/Mam,
Mai mere family k sath pichale 20 years see Mumbai Mai rehata hu.Garmiyo ki chhutiyo or kisi functions Mai family k sath mere gaav uttar Pradesh jate hai.Ham 2 Bhai hai,Chota Bhai uski family or pita ji k sath gaav rahata hai,sabch thik chal Raha tha but achhanak October 2017 Mai mujhe maloom pada ki mere pitaji ne property ki sari vasihat mere Bhai or usaki patani k Naam KR Diya hai..Mai gaav Gaya kafi baat vivad k baad vasihat change hua or mujhe property ka 30% Mila mere pass kuch dusara vikalp nahi tha kyuki pita ji chote Bhai k hi favour Mai hai...but ab wo mujhe dhamaki de Raha hai ki Mai sab property registry krwane ja Raha hu ..tumko kuch nahi dunga..sir mujhe bataye is case Mai kuch Kar sakate hai Kya please guide me sir..Mai Mumbai Mai hi rahata hu ...mere pass 4 bachhe hai ..