Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 15:14
We purchased site in the year 2000 and registered the site in our name in the same year and contructed the house by taking housing loan from bank in 2001. The link document was registered in the year 1951.Recently we have taken loan from bank for repairs and renovation in 2011.Bank has asked us to deposit of title deeds. when we went to registrar office to get register my house in the bank name then registrar said that land belongs to the government.If that land belonged to the government then how did registrar register that site in our name in the year 2000 and how the seller(from whom we bought the site) got registered that site in the year 1951 by registrar.
my questions are
1) why did registrar register the land in our name in 2000 and for the seller name in 1951 without knowing whether it is govt land or not.
2)Now registrar asking us to bring NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE (NOC)
From RDO. If RDO don’t give NOC then what should we do?
3)what are the legal options that we have in this problem.
PLEASE GIVE US YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTION ON THIS PROBLEM
THANKS AND REGARDS
Pradeep Patil
22 July 2011 at 14:38
FACTS
Director A of a Pvt Ltd co has mortgaged his personal residential house as collateral security to a State finance corporation(SFC) for loan advanced by SFC to Pvt. Ltd Co.
Date of registration of mortgage : 09/March/1995
SFC sent notice of possession u/s 29 of SFC Act on 15/feb/2000.
Director A's wife filed suit saying property is Ancestral property and property mortgaged without consent.
Wife's Suit dismissed by court on 9/March/2008.
Based on decision by court on wife's suit SFC took physical possession of Mortgaged Property on 15/June/2011.
No suit filed by SFC at any point of time for possession of Mortgaged property.
Query 1 : Is the possession barred by Law of Limitation?
Query 2 : Is the possession u/s 29 of SFC Act,1951 illegal?
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 14:04
I have a question about the rent control act.
I'm living in Delhi in a rented residence since 1975.Now the Land lord wants me to vacate the premises.Till now my rent was in protection of the Rent act but now it is above 3500.As we are senior citizens do we have protection under the act?
Can i get any protection under any act?
Thank you.
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 13:05
Hello Experts,
We bought a site in Bangalore from a GPA holder. The owner of the property gave GPA rights to two individuals. My query is if the Khata number of the owner will change to two new Khata numbers for the two GPA holders and further, the sites partitioned and sold by the GPA holders will get new Khata numbers with their Registered Sale Deeds reflecting the GPA holder's Khata number.
Thanks
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 12:17
In our area in Mumbai we have seen some religious temple/ mosque been build up which is totally new and going to affect the balance of local population. Is it legal to build such new thing. If no can anyone take action against them.
Thanks in advance...
Ashok Raja M
22 July 2011 at 11:54
We have taken a double portion for rent (as we are a combined family consisting a total of 13 members, 8/9 adults + 4 children) on the September 1, 2010 on the first floor. Owner stays on the ground floor. We paid two months of the rent as advance and paying the rent regularly by the first week of every month. They have shown the high infrastructure and facility of tap water for 24 hours. We already told them in advance that we are big family and children some common disturbances you can expect. Adding to this we stressed that we never changes the house frequently and hence informed the owner that we are likely to stay minimum of 3 years or 5 years. If you want us to vacate within this period, you should not take any of these silly things as pretext to argue or something like.
But soon after entering the house, they started removing the facilities one by one. They are providing only bore water and we are not allowed to use the tap water for 24 hours as they have promised. They removed the shower in bathroom and such trivial things they started doing. We have taken casually and requested to keep up your promises as per the agreement, which they simply ignored saying if you want to stay you stay else vacate the house. Apart from that they are treating us as if we are slaves and frequently say this is their house they do whatever they want.
Our side:
1. We drink alcohol frequently.
2. We, now and then make arguments within ourselves for any of our internal issues, which sounds louder during nights on some occasions.
3. Our children play with noises inlcuding the owner shildrens, do some pencil drawing as they play on the walls and our kids 2yr old make the stairs ugly sometimes by passing urine on the stairs, etc. that we'll clean when we found.
Please note that we are not arguing with the outsider and did not utter anything about any of our neighbors.
Their side:
1. One of members of our owner family (rather, he is the owner) dislikes us and searching for pretext to vacate us.
2. He has closed the ventilation in pretext of rain water entering the ground floor into his house. This causes suffocation and mosquitoes started entering my bed room. I am afraid of fever any kind diseases to any of us.
3. He enters our premises frequently without any notice perhaps in a search for any pretext.
4. He argues with our ladies in an indecent way.
We requested (frankly requested) to remove the cover on ventilation. But he has ignored as usual and repeated the hid dialogue “ this is my home, I do whatever……”. After that he is searching for any small pretext to vacate us.
One of the nights around 11.30 p.m. when we are discussing within ourselves (not arguing louder even), He got upstairs to us and asked us in harsh way to shut the windows because our voice is disturbing him. There is bit of argument in this regard and he is now demanding us to vacate the house within 15 days.
Please guide me precede legally.
Thanks & Regards
Ashok
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 11:53
Is 70-30 law applicable in Chawl redevelopment in Mumbai? If yes then how a person who is paying 50% more rent than others will fight legally on this. We were paying this extra rent for more than 100 yrs, because our room was bigger than others. But builder giving us same area what he is giving to others.
And now he has started harrasing us with the help of MHADA with MHADA letters threatening us to evacuate forcefully. He is also not maintaining the property properly like improper water supply, bad savage system, lighting problem in the evening and many more.
Our chawl property were having very huge FSI, because we were having two grounds with 4 store building.
Waiting for your reply...
Thanks in advance!
k.s.abishek
22 July 2011 at 10:58
My case in karnataka high court is RFA 351
LAST DATE ACTION 18/07/2011
LAST DATE OF ACTION:ADJOURNED
STAGE:PENDING FOR ADMISSION
LAST POSTED FOR:ORDERS
CAN ANY ONE PLEASE HELP ME IN THIS CASE.
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 10:09
Dear Experts,
i have following questions.
1) What will be the Stamp duty on Reconveyance in mumbai?
2) if i purchase i flat and pay proper stamp duty, what will be the stamp duty if i sell out the same flat within 1 year?
is there any concession in bombay stamp Act for the purchaser or Vendor in that regard?
Thank U in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Not fullfilling Basic requirements of FLAT by Builder
Purchased aFLAT in JAMSHEDPUR,JHARKHAND.Total resident in the society is 108.Water is supplied from BOREWELL. BOREWELL water is not adequete for the total number of resident.At present the construction is in Final stage. Out of 108 flats only 30 owner has taken possession.Water is not sufficient for even 30 residents.Repeatedly requesting the BUILDER for extra BORING for water they are saying water source is not available underground.
As a customer what can I do legally? I have taken possession last month.
Please advice .