This event has been postponed due to some technical issues. All the participants will be informed of the dates when it starts. All the best!
Following are the rules that all the participants need to religiously follow in order to stay in the competition. Non-adherence or violation may result in disqualification without any prior notice.
No plagiarism/copy-pasting. The answers should be unique and in one's own words.
The minimum length of the answer has to be 100 words or more.
The quality and authenticity of each answer shall be analyzed by the LCI quality team individually and the decision of the quality team shall be final. Each qualified answer adds 2 points to your score.
Repetitive answers on the same thread would not add to your scorecard.
Participants have to answer only the unattended queries and not the ones that have already been resolved. The direct link to the unattended queries is here - click here
Plz, keep noting the links of the queries that you have answered so the scores can be matched if needed. To make it easier for us and safer for all, you can drop the links on - email@example.com at the end of the day.
Here is a sample answer for you all to follow - click here
(The legal provisions, case laws and link to an a related LCI article)
Any disrespectful or foul comment in the thread would attract disqualification. The decision of the LCI quality team shall be final.
You can add brownie points to your scorecard as well - Sharing the contest poster and tagging 2 friends (On any social media platform) will win you 10 points. Writing a judgment summary gets you 20 and an article gets you 30.
You can drop a mail at firstname.lastname@example.org in case of any query regarding the contest.
23 June 2017
Dear Learned Lawyers, Against the lower court judgment / decree, a fraudulent respondent made an appeal suit in the next appellate court and dragged the appeal suit for more than a year. It is just to drag on the suit and the advocate engaged by him did not appear in the court though the court called for appellant side argument. When the last chance was given by the court, the appellant changed the vakkalat and sought for extension of time. What is the way out in our legal system to come out of such vexatious issues ?
28 June 2017
I sincerely thank all the lawyers who have taken pains in answering to my query. For kind attention of Mr. P.Venu : Sir, I mentioned fraudulent respondent instead of unscrupulous respondent. Yet I feel that there is nothing wrong in calling him as fraudulent respondent because he is a fraudulent person. It is a big story to explain his fraudulent deeds. However, to be honest, let me tell you one of the fraudulent action did by him. He is a power agent who got GPA from a person who is not at all a title holder. By your name, I guess tha you are from Tamil Nadu and if it is so, you might be knowing how it is possible and all. Well, even after the cancellation of the GPA, he registered the Sale Deed of my property. If you wonder how it could be, then I have to tell you the full story and I feel that this is not the right place to tell the complete story.
28 June 2017
Your story has many loop holes. It is easy to blame and name any person as fraudulent but you can not prove it.
Coming to your story, you say that GPA was cancelled and thereafter sale deed was registered. So at first place GPA was given. Now you have to prove it was communicated to other side which is not so easy as you think.And if there is any clause of irrevocable POA than you have to explain its revocation by evidence in court , mere statement will no do.
29 June 2017
Dear Mr. Defense Advocate, The loop holes are not in my story but in our legal system. I understand that the GPA can be cancelled by the principal without prior notice. I have proof to prove that the respondent is a fraudulent person. While doing the Sale Deed Registration, it is clearly mentioned in the documents that the GPA has been cancelled and it is mentioned in the EC. My doubt is that is it not absurd on the part of the judge to simply adjourn the case when the appellant advocate is continuously absenting in attending the case ?