Vakalatnama is necessary or not

guddu (Querist) 28 August 2020 This query is : Resolved
vakalatnama will necassary for complainant to make compromise or not ?
only affidavit is necessary to make compromise in theft case ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

This discussion explores whether a Vakalatnama is necessary for a complainant to reach a compromise in a theft case under IPC 380. While a Vakalatnama isn't always needed for compoundable offences, IPC 380 is non-compoundable. An affidavit might be requested, and out-of-court settlement memos can be submitted with court permission. More specific details are needed to provide a definitive answer.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 28 August 2020
For compromise with the complainant in compoundable offence, complainant need not to have an Advocate / Vakalatnama of his lawyer.

Please state clear material facts of the problem, if any.

guddu (Querist) 28 August 2020
Thankyou RAJENDRA K.GOYAL SIR,
it is 380 ipc hense non compoundable

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 29 August 2020
Who has asked for an affidavit to compromise a theft case ?
Prima facie it is an academic exercise, for which consult your tutor /professor.

Isaac Gabriel (Expert) 29 August 2020
Memo of settlement out of court could be submitted with the permission of the court.

P. Venu (Expert) 29 August 2020
You have not posted the material facts.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries