Order 9 rule 13

M.Anbu chezhian (Querist) 28 January 2020 This query is : Resolved
dismissed CMA under iorder 9 rule 13

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

This discussion addresses a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA) dismissed under Order 9 Rule 13 due to a lack of presented facts and expert obligations. It advises the user to consult their lawyer for an opinion on whether to proceed, especially since expert advice is available free of charge. If unsatisfied with their current legal representation, changing lawyers is suggested.

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 29 January 2020
No facts posted for consideration and obligation of experts.
You have already engaged an able, competent and intelligent lawyer, what is his/ her opinion and advise, proceed if you have faith in him/ her (lawyer) without waiting for experts advise, although it is available FREE OF COST. Otherwise change him/ her immediately.