Is the judgement is correct

francisray (Querist) 04 December 2011 This query is : Resolved
sir, my nana(victor richardson)he was a britisher had married two wifes(first wife name was josphine she had two childern name john and merlyn richard son)when the first wife died victor richardson married second time her name was janemary who was the younger sister of josphine.janemary had three childern from victor richardson two daughter name liliyan and marie and one son named ganet). in apredecided john died in an accident which everyone said that jane has did this but there was no prove after this my mother(merlyn richardson)name came on the 7/12 .after the death of victor richardson jane married second time to michale anthony from who she had eight childern.as she married second time the property was bought by the money of victor richardson who was(a mail driver in the railway the money which he got after the reteriment was used to by the property but we dont have the prove were as jane also didnt have the prove then how the apex court gave the judgement in her favour .the property was not given to the richardson childern but went to anthony childern who was a khalasi.is this a judgement.the mother is not giving the share to there daughter and son of richardson and she had not attend the high and the apex court the even dont know who is janemarry but still gave the judgement in here favour.we r fighting the case past 40 yrs and the apex court is giving the judgement in two day .
i want to say that though mother name was on the 7/12 the high court also gave the judgement that the property was distur buted among the family memeber .why the high court judgement was kept a side.as the property was bought for the welfare of the family the why it was not disturbuted equally among the family member.we even wnt to the lok adalat there also shae didnt came then why without knowing who is janemary the judgement was given in here favour.Are the judges corrupt or our low has turn blind and weak were every tom dick ans harry can come and take the judgement int there favour.Or there r no strong pleader to fight the case.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 04 December 2011
Dear Francisray,
I find that there was another post by "Anonymous" at
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Is-the-judgement-is-correct-255351.asp
and from the names mentioned by you in the above post, it appears you are referring to the same judgment of the Supreme Court.

On going through the decision, I find that the Supreme Court has given appropriate reasons why the High Court order is not acceptable. The Supreme Court has also pointed out that it has not been proved that the money of Victor Richardson was used in purchasing the property in question.

For giving a decision, the Court need not see the party to the case concerned. The Court is concerned only with the pleadings, documents and evidence on record.

Your query whether the Judges were corrupt, or whether there was no strong pleader to plead your case is without any basis.

Just because you lost a case, you should not try to imagine things in those angle.