Right to audience in a labour court.

Varun Joshi (Querist) 11 June 2015 This query is : Resolved
There is a lot of discrepancy regarding who has a right to audience in a labour court. Section 36 of ID act says No advocate can practise in a labour court unless accepted by the union. But the order 3 of cpc says only recogonised agents can appear in courts of India. Section 33 of Advocates act also states that only Advocates have the "Right to Audience". But i came across a report by NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION which states the word 'agent' applies to anyone authorized by the plaintiff. And the learned advocate Gopal Subramanium says supreme court has 'deprived' right to lawyers in the labour court. How does all this add up?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Kumar Doab (Expert) 11 June 2015
What is the link between ID Act, NCDRC!

You may go thru:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER

W.P.(C) NO. 6220/2001

Order reserved on: February 24, 2005

Date of decision: October 21, 2005

SIEMENS LIMITED ..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate

With Mr. Rajendra Dhawan, Advocate.

VERSUS

K.K. GUPTA & ANR. ..... Respondents

http://www.delhicourts.nic.in/octob/SIEMENS%20VS.%20K.K.%20GUPTA.htm

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 11 June 2015
Academic query.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries