Prosecution of judges and magistrates
rishabh
(Querist) 12 October 2013
This query is : Resolved
I would be grateful, if u clarify a point, some copy of copy were produced by the complainant u/s 200 crpc for the faciliation of court, which were marked as case exhibits without comparing the same with the originals and read as genuine evidence against the complainant.
Obviously the M.M.did that deliberatley to avoid to summon the original documents, since the same are inexistent.
Is the act of M.M. punishable under any penal provisions, whether departmental/contempt or any other statue?
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 12 October 2013
The MM is immune for punishment.
You can only challenge the order passed by him before the Revisional court.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 13 October 2013
I agree with the advise of Mr. Barman
ajay sethi
(Expert) 13 October 2013
if you are aggrived by order passed by MM you have a remedy . go in appeal against impugned order
rishabh
(Querist) 13 October 2013
Thanks for response,
The M.M.pronounced his virdict based on the abovesaid irregularity, well knowing that he has committed illegality by assuming non genuine documents as genuine.He knows well that the virdict is contrary to law.
Does it not attract section 219 IPC ?
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 13 October 2013
Appeal against the decision of MM is the way.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 14 October 2013
The remedy of appeal is available before you if you think that the order is perverse on the file.
