Eviction of tenant-bonafide necessity

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 16 September 2011 This query is : Resolved
The premises owned by me was ordered for eviction based on bonafide necessity of my son in 1983,by add district judge in 2002. Tenant filed appeal in 2002.The case came for hearing now. May I beseige your added knowledge about some latest rulings for eviction of premises based on bonafide need at the time of filing the case,with no consideration for subsequent events. 2.Tenant in this case died.The wife of tenant also died. Three sons as L.R.'S are contesting the case. One of them have own bungalow,son of other one is having bungalow,third one is not residing at jaipur. Will this not suffice for no hardship to tenant.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Expert) 17 September 2011
you have a strong ground for eviction now also. these all aspects ccan be briught before the court to show that they do not actaully need the tenanted premises now. hence you can succeed

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 17 September 2011
Yes. These additional facts will add to the strength of your case.

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 17 September 2011
If you can prove all your statements regarding the LRs, you have a good case and can get the order in your favour.

Guest (Expert) 17 September 2011
I agree with experts

prabhakar singh (Expert) 17 September 2011
If you have proved what you state the comparative hardships are still with you against LRs.of tenant and your case preponderates in weight against your opponents.

Guest (Expert) 17 September 2011
Agree with experts.

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 17 September 2011
I do not see any merit in the defence of the tenants.

Chanchal Nag Chowdhury (Expert) 18 September 2011
The problem with your case is not the merit or the lack of it but when it may be heard by the court.Put a little more effort to post the case for hearing.

girish shringi (Expert) 21 September 2011
You have to take a chance,your luck may work,early.

However,litigation will take much of the time,find any middle way to solve the problem.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now