shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
This query is : Resolved
The case details are as under I m accused no 2 Fir is lodged against acused no 1 Complainent said that acused no 1 took computers on rent from him and then he did not return the computers And said computers are told to sold to acused no 2 Now Their is no evidence against acused no 2 No computers recovered Our name is nt in fir No evidence of any thing sold to us And more over its in writing by acused no 1 that he doesnt know to whom he has sold the computers Now the publix prosicutor said that in panchnama whixh was done at our ofice the panch said that acused no 2 said we have taken computer and sold to various customers Now how can a punchnama a punch can come to know in 10 minutes we have sold computers to others And also we have never said that we have taken any computers
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup