vipin
04 June 2014 at 16:06
Hi to all,
This is regarding my nephew whose dob on passport and 10th certificate dont match,reason is his passport was made when he was in 6th class and he facing trouble when he is looking to go aboard as passport and 10th dob vary...
PS:someone suggested that we should surrender old passport and reapply for a new one ,with 10th certificate. IS IT POSSIBLE .
Regards
Harshal Kshatriya
04 June 2014 at 15:58
My parents own multiple ancestral properties in Maharashtra. However, all of them are in some or the other dispute.
Now, we stay in Gujarat since 30 years. Is it practical to appoint a law firm, in Gujarat, which handles all our legal matters in Maharashtra, or should we appoint a local law firm in Maharashtra? Which would be more viable?
Please help me understand the benefits and drawbacks of both.
Abhijeet Kulkarni
04 June 2014 at 15:26
Respected Sir/Madam,.
I had applied a trademark under our partnership firm six months back. Now my partner has moved and I want to change the
Proprietor details of Trademark application from Partnership firm to Proprietorship. Can any one please help me as to which form I need to submit and the cost involved.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Regards
kalaivani
04 June 2014 at 15:25
my father in law owned a land and he died without writing a will. my mother in law is alive. My husband is the only son with 3 elder sisters all sisters are married and aged above 60 years
we want to sell the land do we require NOC from the sisters
aditi
04 June 2014 at 15:23
i joined a real estate company named villa realtors pvt ltd in sep 2013. for a few months they were not making the payment on time so on 16th may i resined from my company and they accepeted. now they are not releaving my salary of 16 days.as an eveidence i have offer letter and appointment letter of that company. they have done the same thing with some other employees alsO. Please suggest me something.
Vinod Trivedi
04 June 2014 at 15:06
Sir,
One of my neighbor died last year. His wife and two married daughter are left behind. I wanted to know what will be the rights for all 3 persons:-
1) Rights in property : In case, no WILL was made by belated father, what will be the share of daughters in property / Cash hold by Mother? (At the time of Death of father, all Deposits are joint in the name of Mother and Father)
2) Rights of daughter in Gold posses by their Mother - Whether all daughters have equal rights in gold ? Or will it be decided by their Mother only? (Majority of gold was not Stri Dhan / Maternal gift from relative of mother, It was made out of earnings of their father)
3) Can mother be a decision making for daughters while distribution of property earned by his husband (i.e. doughter’s father.) Can she legally do unequal distribution?
Please suggest as they asked me to intervene.
Pratik
04 June 2014 at 14:18
Dear Sir,
I have Hearing of My case under section 482 at allahabad High Court and disposed of on 16 May 2014 reagarding quashing of 498 case and 504 case.
My Problem is that after lapse of 17 Days still my order/ judgement is not on the web can anybody help me where i have to complaint or what should i do?????
Pls help
M. kumar
04 June 2014 at 13:23
Respected Sir,
I borrowed money from a money lender in six instalments spread over year 2012 under an agreement on a stamp paper of the value Rs 100 and issued four undated cheque amounting to the total value of the borrowing.
Since then, till Dec 2013, i have repaid almost double the amount to the lender. The loan was received in cash and the repayment was also made in cash. No record for repayment apart from a few phone call recordings where money lender is acknowledging the reciept of various cash repayments. He is not returning my cheques. Now, the lender is bent on creating nuisance threatening me & family with abduction, murder and applying all sort of pressure tactics to extract more out of me. I have written to local & higher police authorities briefing them on the matter. A meeting was also held in presence of respectable people of the society last month where the members from both sides listened to both sides plea and directed the borrower not to bother me in the future. but he he is still not mending his ways.
Kindly guide & help.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About criminal conspiracy and for signature was forged in the memorandum of compromise
I have received High Court order The order say during pendency of appeal preferred by the plaintiffs, it is reported before the court that the parties settled the disputes between them. The have filed I.A.No.357/2001 praying to dismiss the appeal as settled out of court. Accordingly this court dismissed the appeal as settled out of court as prayed for in I.A.No.357/2011.
2 I.A.No.357/2011 is filled only to bring only to bring to the notice of the court the out of court settlement. Taking note of the court settlement this court dismissed the appeal.The Registry wrongly treated the I.A.No.357/2011 as a compromise petition and drawn up a decree and the I.A.No.357/2011 was appended to the decree. In fact this court did not record any terms of compromise between the parties nor ordered that I.A.No.357/2011 shall form part of the decree.The decree shall be a simple dismissal of the appeal as settled out of court.
3. Review petitioners are 5 respondent and additional 10 respondent in R.F.A. It is submitted that the 6 respondent did not signed the I.A.No.357/2011 nor is a party to the out of court settlement.The additional 10 respondent in the R.F.A is not a party to the suit. He was impleaded in the appeal. It is submitted that he is not a party to the out of court settlement. On that basis the review petitioners filed the review petition seeking to review the decree and judgment in R.F.A.No.164/2006.As already stated vide judgment dated 7.3.2011this court dismissed the appeal.No relief was granted to the appellant.The submission of the parties that the parties have settled the disputes between them out of court alone is recorded.Since the reveiew petitioner are not aggreieved by the dismissal of the appeal review petition filed seeking to review the judgment and decree in appeal cannot be entertained. Accordingly review petition is dismissed.
4 The decree drafted by the Registry appending I.A.No.357/2011 was done incorrectly. The Registry shall redraft the decree recording the dismissal of the appeal.The learned counsel for the appellant submit that respondents 3 to 5&8 in the review petition submits that the vakalath nama is duly attested by counsel practicing in the lower court.Vakalath submitted by 10 respondent is attested by lawyer from kalpetta and in the vakalath filed by 5respondent who is the 1 review petitioner by another lawyer from Bodinayakanoor.The Registry shall issue certified copy of the vakalath filed on behalf of 5 respondent and additional 10 responden in the appeal who are the review petitioners herein on usual terms.
After getting order I have complaint to The Superintendent of Police, and Bar council of kerala about criminal conspiracy and for signature was forged in the memorandum of compromise .But so far the no action against them. Now what shall I do in this matter I want get my justice in this matter.