LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ranganath   07 September 2014 at 04:43

Personal appearance of accused durng appeal

Ld counsels,

Accused goes on appeal to session court to challenge his conviction, once after the suspension of sentence is it mandatory for accused to appear before the session court during all dates of appeal.

Thanks in advance.

chimi   07 September 2014 at 01:51

Noc is mandatory for state psc

Sir,
I am working in the central Governmant Public Sector Unit and want to apply for the jobs of the State Psc and the UPSC but here HR department is denying for the NOC so what can I do

sunil jiloka   07 September 2014 at 01:25

Bank npa a/c

RESPECTED EXPERTS

WE ARE FACING SERIOUS HARASSMENT ISSUE UCO BANK

A LADY HAS TAKEN CASH CREDIT IS TAKEN RS.3 LACS AGAINST FD. RS1.5 LACS AND HUSBAND BECOME GURANTOR --BUT SHE BECOME METTALLY ILL
WITHIN 8 MONTHS AND SHOP CLOSED AND A/C BECOME NPA
BANK ADUSTED F/D AND FILE A CASE BOTH LANDY(MENTAL -ILL) AND HUSBAND OF RS. 2 LACS
NOW ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IS NOT GOOD. HUSBAND REQUEST BANK FOR COMPROMISE-SETTLEMENT IN RS. 1 LACS , MANAGER ACCEPTING IN TAKING APPLICATION WITH MONEY RS 25000/- RECEVING GIVEN . 20 DAYS AFTER A WARRANT COME HUSBAND IS SURPRISSED AND CONTACT BANK BUT IGNORE HIM .
HUSBAND FIL WRITT IN HIGH-COURT FOR STOP WARRANT AND TO DIRECT TO BANK ACCEPT COMROMISE.
ON COURT-DATE TIME BRANCH MANAGER CONTACT HUSBAND ASSURING HIM COME AND NEGOCIATE COMROMISSE.THIS CONVERSION IS RECORDED IN MOBILE.
HUSBAND- ADVOCATE MADE A MISTAKE AND TAKE A LIBERTY BEFORE COURT
ADVERSE ORDER IS PASSED TO DEPOSIT FULL AMOUNT WITHIN 3 MONTHS

DUE TO BANK-MANAGER DISCUSSTION (RECORDING)
PETIONAR"S ADV BELIVE AND MAKE A SUCIDE .


THERE IS ANY SOLUTION OR IMMIDIATE RELIEF ???????
PLZ ADVISE
9431248617

Venkat Mogga   07 September 2014 at 00:58

Land deal payment recovery

hi,
i,ve purchased a land from one of our family friend. We had agreed that I will make payment in installment. And i paid 3 lacs advance. She gave us a kaccha receipt and made a hand written ageement on a plain paper. I paid her 10 lacs. We had agreed that all pAyment thru cheque. But last weel she imsisted for cash payment i.e. In black. I had a doubt so i thoughtof cancelling the deal. And. i asked her to return my money in installments.but she is simply avoiding and giving reasons that she d
oesnt has money. She is also not speaking about paying thru PDC. Please help me how do i recovermy mney.

Lakshmi   07 September 2014 at 00:18

Alternate remedy

If a same cause of action has two remedies, you approach either of the court's which grants the remedy.
Will alternate remedy be a bar to accept the case if the cause of action is one and the same.
If possible any judgments which say that alternate remedy is not a bar if cause of action are one and the same.

narendra   07 September 2014 at 00:03

transfer of 498a case

dear experts for both domestic voilence and
divorce case transfers sc refered for mediation.as per supreme court order I decided to attend
mediation and I have sent 25000 DD to my lawyer
for depositing in sc..mediation is on 22nd
September 2014...today after seeing cases status
in sc i came to know that after mediation order
for domestic voilence filed by her and divorce filed
by me,now wife has filed for transfer of 498a and
other criminal cases filed by her on me and my
family members in Bangalore, Karnataka and filed
in sc to transfer from Karnataka to Andhra
pradesh..please advice me sc will transfer even
498a also...in present conditions mediation will
happen or not..what are the chance s of transfer
ering 498a cases.all she has filed in Bangalore
and asking for transfer to her native place..how
to stop the transfer of cases in supreme
court..please experts Ur valuable
suggestions..regarding transfer of 498a case and
supreme court mediation procedure and chance s
settling family disputes..

Gopal Krishnan   06 September 2014 at 23:25

Powe of court

APPELLANT PLEADED AND PRAYED TO CONDONE DELAY OF 12 DAYS. ACTUAL DELAY WAS 25 DAYS
WHICH WAS POINTED OUT BY RESPONDENT WHO OPPOSED THE PLEA TO CONDONE 12 DAYS DELAY.
APPELLANT DID NOT CONTROVERT THE AVERMENT OF RESPONDENT OR MAKE ANY AMENDMENT TO HIS PLEA AND PRAYER. IN SPITE OF THIS FACTUAL POSITION THE APPEAL COURT CONDONED DELAY OF 25 DAYS. IS IT PROPER FOR THE APPEAL COURT TO GRANT RELIEF WHICH IS NOT PLEADED OR PRAYED FOR ? HAS THE APPEAL COURT POWER TO DO SO OR IS IT COLOURABLE EXERCISE OF POWER? ?

naveenraj jain   06 September 2014 at 22:43

daughters right

Dear sirs An ancestral property was sold under sale agreement where all family members signed except daughters. This property was in court for partition between father and sons where daughters were made parties as defendants. Daughters have appeared and filed vakalaths. Case was decreed that since property is already sold via sale agreement hence no rights for partition. All this happenned till 2001. Query is when daughters have not signed to the agreement do they still have their respective rights existing. Or the court order is binding on them. Kindly enlighten.

aswini   06 September 2014 at 22:14

transfer of property as gift deed

Land of 10 cents was acquired by grand father in 79 and constructed rcc then in 2004 my dads brother constructed house in 5 cents land seeking permission from grandpa and submitting same to panchayat then in 2012 dad took permission in form of affidavit and submitted same to panchayat for which they gave approval to construct so he constructed a house then later in 2014 just 10 days before of grandpas death my grandpa made the whole property in name of granny stating he was the one to construct both the houses and she posses all rights on property including rents my grandpa has 2 sons and 2 daughter's now please advice what should we do

Ajay Itakikar   06 September 2014 at 21:38

Sec. 138

A person issued me a cheque. I deposited it to my banker. It was bounced. My banker returned that cheque along with a memo. There is message for reason of bouncing the cheque that 'Account is freeze'. Later I found that state government freeze that account for certain investigation. May I prosecute that person under section 138?