gk
05 September 2026 at 23:45
Respected Experts,
Pranam!
Seeking your brief guidance on a parking bottleneck issue in a KRERA-registered apartment complex (Kerala, OC received October 2022, built under KMBR 1999).
Key Facts:
• The Setup: 40 flats. Sale Deeds vaguely state parking is "as marked in the designated place with the flat number," without specifying individual square meters. Actual slot sizes vary wildly from 7 sq. mtrs to 18 sq. mtrs.
• The Problem: Multiple owners in the basement have upgraded to large SUVs (Fortuner/Innova). When parked, they completely block the driveways. Consequently, 6 vehicles in that row and 4 vehicles opposite are physically trapped and cannot reverse or turn. At least 7 more owners are upgrading to larger cars this year.
• Complication: The builder also sold 7 extra parking slots to some owners, further cramping the basement - I mean there are owners with multiple car parking slots.
• The Dilemma: Most residents are senior citizens. Beyond the physical parking issue itself, they are highly stressed about the prospect of entering into active legal friction, personal arguments, or tense confrontations to resolve this. They simply want a peaceful retirement.
Seeking your brief perspective on:
1. Can the Apartments Owners Association (AOA) legally challenge the builder (via KRERA/Consumer Court) for allocating unmanageable, substandard slots (as low as 7 sq. mtrs)?
2. Is the builder's sale of "extra" parking slots legally valid, or can the AOA reclaim that space for common turning areas?
3. Does an AOA have the right to regulate vehicle sizes in narrow rows to protect the common "Right of Way"?
Any brief pointers or relevant directions would be highly appreciated.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
gk
anand kumar
04 September 2026 at 15:43
Hi, my grand father and his 3 sons bought 1.58 acre in 1973 in 2 survey nos 206/8a and 9a( 0.77 and 0.81) as no further partition happened during their time in govt records we received as 206/8a .0.19 cents and 206/9a 0.20cents....though it was not written ,all of 4 parties had a understanding. And greed to divide the property into 4 equal whole parts ... one party specified his part boundaries in his family partion deed and he made transaction in 206/8a and other party made a sale deed to his wife as 206/8a .0.19 and 206/9a .20...but sold his share in 206/8a as agreed by parties....now i am th 3rd party , my part falls in 206/9a ...how to get my part departed and registered to me and what survey numbers should I mention
Anonymous
04 September 2026 at 09:57
As the 3 daughters only inheritance rights just to title purpose signe in favour of eldest daughter as there was no Partition took place 3 daughters being inheritance rights can do such for title purpose only keeping intake vary nature of the property and their rights.
Eldest daughter can do such act on support of title? Aggrieved daughters can file suit adgainst her?
Anonymous
04 September 2026 at 09:00
If eldest daughter sold property without consent of the legal heir daughters 4 months back on virtue of title in her favour.
There after vary nature of the property remain unchanged ancestors property.
The Act of eldest daughter lawful?
Deprived daughters can challenge and claim their shares in disposal amount.
No legal partition took place.
Eldest daughter admitted succession rights of the daughters in family tree in affidavit manner.
ASHWIN JOSHI
03 September 2026 at 11:18
3 daughters signed transfer deed in favour of Mother.Tital purpoe Ancestors property.Mother made testament in favour of eldest daughter only.
Eldest daughter submitted family tree succession admission of the sisters b4 executive magistrate Mamlatdar.
Later all of sudden 2026 she sold whole property in her favour.Depriving daughters
On vertue of title.
Is it lawful?
Anonymous
03 September 2026 at 06:40
Daughter rights in ancestors property deprived once accepted in family tree later one of the heirs obtain title on her name from her mother deprived succession rights and also no partition took place.
Anonymous
02 September 2026 at 15:03
Hi Experts,
I had a HSBC credit card in 2007 with limit of 93000. My friend used it and betrayed me. However, he paid minimum dues for close to 5 to 6 months in 2010. In 2010 i received calls from one of recovery agency to pay 16000.00 to make the card closed properly. Still i sm not in good financial position to pay it and left it as it. Now i prefer to close it properly. I tried to reach HSBC bank. They advised to go in person to branch. Also in Experian report it was marked as closed with outstanding of 93K. How to close this credit card properly with amicable payment.
Sreekumar J Pai
02 September 2026 at 12:39
In our apartments we have 1, 2, and 3 BHK flats. Common are maintenance charges are levied rs. 1400, 1800 and 2000 respectively. Is this justifiable when the owner's right on the common area is undivsible and equal ? How an owner's association can charge based on the area of flat held?
Anonymous
02 September 2026 at 12:31
Salary less paid by employer and not giving any reason for that we have mailed for the same
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Relinquish deed not mentioned in notice reply
Defendant failed to produce such evidence