Car parking occupied by owner builder in standalone
Skanda
(Querist) 12 May 2026
This query is : Resolved
I want to share my story. i purchased a flat for 63.63 lakhs spent 7 lakhs on registration 1 lakh on khata transfer and 20 lakhs on interior in ks layout Bangalore 560111 in 2017. i didn't have a car when purchasing a flat. There were 10 flats in the building. 8 are sold to outsiders. 2 are penthouse occupied by builder and his sons. Builder and sons have 6 cars and because I didn't have car they occupied my car parking and told me when I bring car they will vacate. Few months later i bought car but builder refused to vacate my spot. When I protested the builder and hiz sons beat me up and fractured my leg . My mother complained to ks layout police for ipc 307. Builder and sons false filed COUNTER COMPLIANT under ipc 307. The inspector told my mother that if they go ahead they will register both FIR as cross FIR. And then I would have to go to court to clear my name. Because I am A psu employee a s a govt servant FIR would mean suspension. So he advised and I withdrew my complaint and builder also withdrew his complaint. After I recovered i put the flat for resale but due to no resale market for standalone building in ks layout I sold it for just 56 lakhs as no buyers were available for my invested price of 90 lakhs. I suffered A massive 34 lacs loss. That is a harrowing experience, and it is deeply frustrating that a situation starting with a simple property right escalated into physical violence and a significant financial loss.
It is completely understandable why i felt backed into a corner regarding the police complaint. The threat of a "cross FIR" is a common, though highly manipulative, tactic used to exploit the professional stakes of government employees. Choosing to protect career and long-term stability in that moment was a survival decision, even if the outcome felt unjust.
Losing 34 lakhs is a staggering blow, especially after the physical and emotional trauma i endured. Many people underestimate the "builder-tenant" power dynamic in standalone buildings, where the lack of a formal Residents' Welfare Association (RWA) or professional security can leave individual owners vulnerable to this kind of bullying.
Moving Forward and Finding Closure
While the financial loss is heavy, there are a few perspectives that might help as i move past this chapter:
Safety Over Property: No amount of real estate is worth physical safety or life. By selling and leaving, i removed yourself from a toxic and dangerous environment where the "neighbors" had already proven they were willing to cause serious harm.
The "Peace of Mind" Dividend: While the math shows a 34-lakh loss, staying would have likely resulted in years of ongoing legal fees, medical bills, and the daily stress of living next to your attackers. Sometimes, cutting a loss is the only way to stop the "bleeding" of mental health.
A Hard Lesson in Due Diligence: my story serves as a powerful cautionary tale for others. It highlights why checking the parking layout, the ratio of cars to slots, and the reputation of a small-scale builder is just as critical as checking the title deeds.
It takes a lot of resilience to start over after being treated so unfairly
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 14 May 2026
You have repeated the same subject matter in a different thread of this forum today itself, which will not be entertained.
P. Venu
(Expert) 14 May 2026
You could have served a legal notice, followed by a civil action.
However, the real issue is that you are allowing yourself to be overawed by the so-called builder and also your exaggerated notions based on your status as a "psu employee and a Government servant".
What is the source of your information that "FIR would mean suspension"?
Your own fear is your real enemy.
Dr. J C Vashista
(Expert) 15 May 2026
Too long a story for consideration and obligation of experts on this platform.
It is better to contact and consult a local prudent lawyer for proper appreciation of facts/ documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding.
kavksatyanarayana
(Expert) 20 May 2026
It is repeated. For the first query, Sri Kalaiselvan Sir very well advised you, though posted again is not correct.
