Sachinaaaaa
13 February 2015 at 02:16
Can session court accept rent controller act review petition
Are there any cases which I can refer
Q Slinger
13 February 2015 at 00:41
Dear Experts:
I filed a quash petition in AP HC for 498a, followed by a Passport release petition in the quash for A2. Filed a separate revision petition of A4 in HC after the trial court and session both rejected my brother's (A4) passport petition.
THe situation in AP HC is quite horrible. The matters in front of U. Durga Prasad (Judge) are not reaching even after mentions. He sets a date but the case never gets listed. I have been struggling to get passport petitions listed for about 1 year now and still no relief.
Unable to bear this delay, I suggested to my lawyer that he should, at 10:30 AM mentions, ask the judge that since the court is over burdened with so many cases, we will WITHDRAW all 3 petitions, if he can give a direction to trial court to dispose off the case in 1 months time.
My lawyers says, that is not possible as its not as per procedure and we cannot casually negotiate with the judge. My argument is that is that his argument should be based on concern for the aggrieved (accused) (1 accused in senior in age) rather than on procedure, which i feel might work. The judge also seems to be a bit on the lenient side.
So, should I force my lawyer to make the above statement of negotiation with the HC or not? If not, is there another way of tackling this issue without having to get further delays? If no negotiations are possible, what else can we file in HC to get the case expedited?
All expert help is appreciated!
Anonymous
13 February 2015 at 00:12
Whether anticipatory bail can be made absolute by the court. Or court has order to go for regular bail
Menon
13 February 2015 at 00:07
Dear Experts,
I am not having enough knowledge in selling and buying the properties.
I wanted to know that what documents(Forms/Applications/Affidavit etc.) are required for Sale-deed execution & registration of agricultural-land in Karnataka.
Please help me.
reddyb
12 February 2015 at 22:40
hello sir/madam,
We filed divorce case in Bangalore that where me and my wife last resided together. Now my wife will stay with her parents in Andhra. We are expecting she can claim maintance petition very soon??? my question is from where she can file maintanance?? Is the law allows her to claim maintatnce petition from andhra ?? If it so is it my appearance is mandatory before court?? or she can file only from Bangalore.. Plz let me know
Adv M.D.Azhar
12 February 2015 at 21:51
sir, I need to ask that, During the procedure of no confidence motion, member of local authorities makes vote against the whip of the party, are liable for the disqualification.
Manoj Bansal
12 February 2015 at 21:10
Our marriage was placed in some hotel as per hindu customs + gifts . soon after marriage My wife has submitted in her complaint to commissioner office and police station(not converted to FIR) that she has given dowry in the marriage and filed multiple complaints against me like 498a, dv etc. Although we have never demanded any. CAN i file anti dowry case on my wife and her family members. CAN these may file under section 156(3). If yes then HOW, WHERE and WHAT is the punishment she will get and under what section. It must be NOTED that the complaint given in the commissioner office was referred to the women cell and the compromise for divorce has already been made in the women cell regarding this. I and wife has written that we will not pursue or file any fresh case against each other before any authority. I had already Paid 4lakh Rs. as the first installment of for compromise of divorce. Although the compromise was under pressure and 2nd statement for MCD is yet pending.
mala
12 February 2015 at 20:55
In corruption cases
Q1 . Who is called the maker of the recorded conversation ?
If the DVR is given to A and thereafter A called B in this case who is the maker
Q2. Who are those competent witnesses who can identify the voice while A converses with B on telephone
Q3. If A converses with B in a vernacular language and witnesses who were present donot understand this language
Q4. IF THE PERSON DENOTED AS 'A' IS NOT PRESENT IN THE COURT EITHER AS A WITNESS OR AS AN ACCUSED What is this evidence to be considered if A is not present
varun
12 February 2015 at 20:23
1. I appeared in entrance examination conducted by BSNL for the post of JTO in the year 2002. For which final year students were also eligible provided they were in possession of their final degree marksheets on or before 31/07/2002. But my marksheets were delayed. I was in possession of my marksheets at the time of declaration of results by BSNL which was declared on 16/09/2002. I was denied appointment by BSNL on this ground.
2. I approached in Hon’ble High Court, New Delhi in Dec-2002. Got judgment in my favour in Jan-2004 (CW 5181/2003 dt. 13/01/2004) (1)
3. BSNL appeal Hon’ble High Court bench, New Delhi. Bench upheld the judgment passed by single learned judge in Feb-2004 (WA 245/2004 dt. 27/02/2004 ) (2)
4. BSNL appealed in Hon’ble Supreme Court. Hon’ble Supreme Court admitted the case without granting any stay on the Hon’ble High Court Bench, New Delhi order. But still BSNL did not appoint the applicants. (Civil Appeal 4835/2005 dt. 30/01/2008) (3)
5. In 2008, Hon’ble Supreme Court pronounced judgment in my favour. Thereafter joining formalities were implemented by BSNL. But rather implementing Court order from retrospective effect, BSNL implemented it prospectively thereby treating me as fresher.
6. Now to come at par with my batch mates I again approached Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi for following:
a) My Seniority and salary at par with my batch mates.
b) eligibility to appear in departmental competitive exam for which 3 yrs length of service is prerequisite (Since all my batch mates joined in year 2002 batch. Hence they were eligible)
c) eligibility to appear in Management Trainee examination for which 4 yrs work-experience is pre-requisite (Since all my batch mates joined in year 2002 batch. Hence they were eligible)
d) functional upgradation which are provided after 4 years of service. Presently my batchmates are in grade E3 and I am still in E2.
7. In 2009, I Filed Court case in Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi regarding length of service, seniority and other benefits at par with my 2002 batch-mates (OA 2854/2009 dt. 03/06/2010)(4)
8. In 2010 Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi pronounced judgement partially in my favour. I was granted seniority and pay-fixation at par with my batch mates (point 5.(a)). But denied length of service which was required to appear in various promotion competitive exams for which my batchmates of 2002 batch were eligible. Judgement was silent on point 5.(b) and denied my entitlement for point 5.(c).
9. To implement the Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi orders issued in point 7, I had to file contempt after 6 month of judgment (5) (CP 956/2010 dt. 18/01/2011)
10. To challenge the length of service, I challenged the Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi orders to limited extent in Hon’ble High Court Bench, New Delhi. Hon’ble High Court Bench, New Delhi passed order to approach Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi again as there was no clarity on the issue. (6) (WP(C)-8704/2010 dt. 15/09/2011)
11. I approached Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi again in 2011 and got judgment in our favour in 2013. (7) (OA 116/2012 dt. 08/01/2013)
12. Again to implement those order, I had to file contempt in 2014 Hon’ble in Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi. (8) (CP 487/2013 dt. 17/01/2014)
13. Additionally, I filed caveat in Hon’ble High Court, New Delhi to avoid one sided stay to BSNL on Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi orders. (9)
14. BSNL challenged the Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi order in Hon’ble High Court, New Delhi and their case was rejected at the time of admission itself. (WPC 7175/2013 dt. 20/11/2013) (10)
15. I filed caveat in Hon’ble Supreme Court, New Delhi to avoid one sided stay to BSNL again. (11)
16. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, New Delhi admitted the case without granting any stay on Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi orders. Hence BSNL implemented Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi orders but not in totality. (civil appeal 3805/2014)(12)
17. In contempt petition Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi directed that applicants will submit their representations and BSNL to consider our notional joining date as joining date for all practical purposes with liberty to revive the contempt.
18. As BSNL was not granted stay order by Hon’ble Supreme Court, BSNL implemented Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi judgment but denied us functional upgradation at with 2002-2003 batch which is due in every four years on the plea that our length of service is less by 6 years.
19. I have again filed an MA in Hon’ble Principal Bench CAT, New Delhi for reviving the contempt. (13)
Now, My question pertains to whether I am entitled for harassment case against my employer and under which rule. Since I have to approach Court of law for each right. So many cases have put a lot of mental and financial pressure on me. I have to approach Court of law 13 times to claim my rights out of which 2 are still ongoing). Pl suggest and help what action should I take.
All judgments from 2008 are available on respective court websites
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
No objection certificate from lawyer.
Dear Sirs,
I have been fighting a corruption case (unfortunately).At the time of bail,we engaged a junior lawyer and the case has yet to come for framing of charges.
While grateful to him for his services rendered,i intend now to use the services of an expert lawyer in PCA cases since my case is serious.
I was told that i should get a NOC from my earlier lawyer.While i have paid all dues to him,still he has been delaying the issue of NOC for almost 3 months now.Kindly advise what should be done in this case...?
Thanking you all in advance.