ashis talukder
08 February 2016 at 12:19
"A" - a salaried person having net Taxable Income Rs.4,25,000/- p.a. purchased a flat in Kolkata for Rs.12,00,000/- (original transaction value) on April 2015, but stamp duty was paid on Govt.Value of Rs.20,00,000/- at d time of Registration (i.e. April 2015), agreement was made before 3 yrs. Would u plz guide is there is any Tax liability?How much?What will b d procedure?Is d new sec 56(2)(vii)-INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES is applicable? Thnx. Regds.Ashis.
sagar
08 February 2016 at 12:14
I just wanto know about issue durring the period of building transfer from gram panchayat to corporation under were building wasn't have TP Sactioned so please suggest me asap.
Harish N
08 February 2016 at 12:13
Sir I'am working in a startup company(LLP) from 1.3 Years.
They have not mentioned my notice period in offer letter. Now i wanted to leave the company, i had sent a resignation letter to them via Email and they also accepted the resignation and they had also sent me a mail saying that 15-02-2016 will be my last working day. Based on that email i had given a joining date for another company. Now they are saying that we cannot relieve on 15th. What can i do ?
Toughest2016
08 February 2016 at 12:12
Hello Dear Learnered Experts,
Have researched and have asked with few of learned members in person on the question and was not able to arrive at a conclusion. Please provide your most valuable suggestions.
I have a divorce case running. I filed divorce other party filed RCR. Wife side has given WS to my petition. I am submitting my WS for RCR now.
In RCR they have mentioned 2 dates and certain occurances. On both the dates I was in a different place and hold public document to prove my claim. Please suggest, should I reveal my proofs or mention that I hold valid documents in my WS objection for their RCR or plainly deny without mentioning anything.
Your valuable suggestion would be greatly helpful.
Thank You.
ANJANEYULU BANDA
08 February 2016 at 12:07
member is asking for watchman premises on rental basis. If not given threatening of disrupting society meetings. We are 32 members all are peace loving people.Please advice. Member is abusing watchman and expecting committee members to act fast to his demands. how to deal with such elements legally ? please let us know whom to consult what action to be taken.
Sameer sawant
08 February 2016 at 11:42
Dear sir, recently i have purchased 1bhk flat in 4 storied bldg at taloje navi mumbai along with stilt parking but now i came to know that builder can not sell car parking area of 4 storied bldg . Pls . Confirm on the same
BINDU MADHAVI
08 February 2016 at 11:36
Hi sir/madam
When do we get the patent agent 2016 notification
BINDU MADHAVI
08 February 2016 at 11:33
Hi sir/madam
When do we get the patent agent 2016 notification
Rajeswariii
08 February 2016 at 11:20
My friend, who joined with State Bank of India as Probationary officer in Mar 2011 was terminated in Jun 2013 even after extending his probation in Apr 2013.The reason cited is he has not disclosed a pending case (Marriage related)against him. The case is settled in Jan 2013 in Lok Adalat.He has got a notice by SBI in Dec 2012 reg the case and Case is settled in Lok adalat as compromise in Jan 2013. The details are submitted by him to Bank.Later, after extending probation in Apr 2013, he is terminated in Jun 2013.
Probation is for a period of 2 years. After completion of 2 yrs probation period, Bank extended the probation citing a ground that the candidate has to improve the subject but not on the ground of the case. Later after extension of probation, within 1 month, service is terminated. The case is a false case Under Sec 417,420 Under sec 34 and also under sec 3,4 of Dowry prohibition act(resolved in Jan 2013 in Lok adalat)
The case came to the notice of SBI while making enquiry about antecedents. The judgement is given by lok adalat is a compromise award is given between two parties and the case is closed. The termination notice contained details of the sections of the case. But, it didn't mention about the case in extension letter given in Apr 2013."
The case came to the notice of SBI while making enquiry about antecedents.
The Bank gave a show cause notice regarding the pending case on 10.12.2012 giving a deadline of 31.12.2012 to answer. My friend replied on 31.12.2012 to give one month time to submit proofs defending his version. Accordingly, he got the case resolved in Lok adalat on 29.01.2013 and submitted the proof and explanation on 07.02.2013. Later, on 02.04.2013, he was given an extention of probation letter indicating that his performance need to improve. No information relating to show cause and his explanations. Later after one month, on 03.05.2013, he was issued a termination order with one month notice mentioning the show cause letter. No mention is given about the probation extention letter.
I came to know that Hon’ble Chandigarh High Court (Punjab & Haryana) Justice Sri Kuldeep Singh gave a judgement around 23.12.2015 in the case of Amandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab that non disclosure of pending case should not lead to termination. Can you please send me the copy of it??
Please help in our case.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Pay and seniority
Dear Sir
please find details
Anomalies in pay scales
1.2.20 Insofar as anomalies relating to the pay scales are concerned, a large number of these anomalies would be automatically settled by introduction of the proposed scheme of running pay bands. . . . . . .
2.2.11. . ..... Grade pay will determine the status of a post with (apart from the two apex scales of Secretary/equivalent and Cabinet Secretary/equivalent that do not carry any grade pay) a senior post being given higher grade pay. Grade pay being progressively higher for successive higher posts,
2.2.11 . …….. In the revised scheme, the date of annual increments, in all cases, will be the first of July. Employees completing six months and above in the scale as on July 1st will be eligible. This is being recommended to alleviate a large number of anomalies that arise due to the present system of annual increments where the increments are given on the basis of the month of joining a particular post and which frequently leads to a senior drawing lesser salary than his/her junior.
2.2.13 ………..
(vi) Seniority of a post will depend on the grade pay drawn. This will invariably be more for a higher level post. Pay scales will largely become irrelevant for purposes of computing seniority. Thus, the present situation where frequently a junior draws higher salary (albeit in lower pay scale) vis-Ã -vis his senior because of longer years of service, will no longer be of any essence for purposes of computing seniority.
In view of above I would like to know whether
1)Employee promoted on 1/9/2006 in GP 5400/- receiving less pay than his junior of same cadre in GP 4600/-
2) An employee promoted to GP of Rs.6600/- on 1/9/2012 receiving less pay than his junior in GP Rs.5400/- in the same cadre and
3)An employee promoted to grade pay of 6600 on 1/9/2012 is getting less pay than his counter part promoted to the same post on 1/9/2015
will constitute anomaly or not?