Manjula
31 January 2016 at 12:54
We are Indian Christians. My cousin Sharon who is a government employee, married but separated from her husband immediately within a year.She has no children. She did not take a divorce from her husband. Her husband immediately married and he has two children from his second wife. She is the only daughter to her parents. Her parents died. She died on 25/1/2016 after her retirement. She did not write any will. She did not adopt anyone during her lifetime. She has no parents or uncles or aunties from her mother's side or father,s side. She has five cousin brothers and two cousin sisters from her mother's side and one cousin sister from her father's side. Now who can be the legal heirs to her immovable and movable properties as per law.
Siddhartha
31 January 2016 at 12:35
I am a b.com graduate. Presently I am pursuing CS course. What is better along with this a 3 yr LLB degree or a 5 yr LLB degree to boost my career.?
sachin agarwal
31 January 2016 at 12:31
This is the settled law that in case the dues under the provident fund contribution for the certain employees is due from the part of the employer will be determined only with respect to those employees who are identifiable and whose entitlement can be proved on the evidence, and in the event the record is not available, it would not be obligated to explain its loss, or any adverse inference be drawn on this score.
Where the employer is engaged in the construction industry and in the said industry the employer has employed certain long-term employees for whom the provisions of the provident fund act, 1952 and a scheme thereunder are being followed regularly, yet there are certain casual workers who come to work at the construction sites of the employer for a address, then these work men not been identifiable and it is practically very difficult, in fact almost impossible, to comply with the requirements of the provident fund scheme in respect of such migrant labourers. Therefore, the order of the authority for provident fund contribution without a finding about identifiablity of the employees cannot be sustained.
That the conclusion is that if the identification of the employees for whom benefits of the product contribution is entitled to be made and it is not possible practically and almost impossible to collect the details of the proper identification of such unidentified employees, the order of the provident fund authority is unjustified and therefore cannot be sustained in the eyes of law because the provident fund contribution is not a tax but this is the fund for the benefits of eligible employees and if there is no proof of address of those eligible employees the benefits of the provident fund contribution cannot be handed over to the those eligible employees in accordance with the provision of law.
shruti gupta
31 January 2016 at 11:50
Good day experts
I m employed in an aided school affiliated to u.p. board in firozabad since 7 years. I was selected through selection commission. I m basicaly from kanpur.since my only brother died in an accident, I m the lone child of my parents. Becoz of the demise of my brother my mom hav been suffering from high B P and kidney shrinkage. She needs full-time complete care and my father is also old. I have a 2years old child .my husband is employed in merchant navy and remain on ship half of the year. So responsibility to bring up my child is up to me only.
Now it has become very tough for me to continue my job from firozabad so I need to take transfer to Kanpur.
But the management committee is not willing to give me noc.
So experts I need ur kind advice whether there is any provision to get noc from management committee.
Thanks in advance
Shruti gupta
hamed bin mohd qarmoshi
31 January 2016 at 11:48
Misken Fatima complaint represent by her mother .plzz help I paid 2000/ - per month to maintan my child after divorce .I received a court notice a filling counter if any you hereby directed to attend this court on the said date without fail. Date 4 Feb 2016
Mrs.Ramya.K
31 January 2016 at 11:29
My friend was worked as contract worker and the company deducted PF. unfortunately the company terminated in 6 months(165 Days). So he went to office to submit his PF claim form. But the HR said you are not compleeted 180 days (From JUNE 15th,2015 to 31st Nov,2015 165 days). it was not possible to claim if at all submitted it will be rejected by pf. recently he joined in other company their he don't have PF facility. Advise him what to do?
Vijay Gangan
31 January 2016 at 09:37
it is necessary to legal practice to get registration from Bar council. After completion of LLB, can person eligible to do legal practice and issue legal notice on behalf of clients without registration of Bar Council. Please advise
sowjanya
31 January 2016 at 04:20
My question is "Is the decision given by LOK ADALAT final, can I file a case aginsst him in civil court " ?
Satya nand aggarwal
31 January 2016 at 03:59
Money Suit decreed with cost, lawyer submitted fee form before pronouncing judgment but not mentioned in decree sheet by mistake.
My point is whether correction can be made under section 151,152 Cpc. Please provide any judgment.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Trasfer of the land
We would like to know that my my married younger brother had been died before 3 years.He had no child and his wife now get married again and leave the house and property which was my brother name could not come to his wife name due to process of chakbandi.After chakbandi process can this property come to directly our name or my mother name. Now we would like to remind you again that his wife get married earlier and living with her husband in his house. Kindly reply.