S.D. Singh
14 February 2016 at 10:15
My son received a cheque which bounced. Now he is out of station and i want to lodge case on his behalf. Can i do so. If yes who would be the complainant. My son or me. Whether i have to take POA from my son. Please suggest procedure in this case.
girijesh kumar Mehta
14 February 2016 at 09:39
Sir I am law graduate from burdwan university of the year 2008 but didn't enroll myself in any bar council at that time due to some personal issues. But now I want to sit in judicial exam and for that enrollment is required. Can I enroll myself now. I ask this because presently I work in government aided school. Can I apply for enrollment, sir. My motive is to sit for judicial exam and not to practice law before any court of law.please suggest......... Girijesh kumar Mehta
girijesh kumar Mehta
14 February 2016 at 09:35
Sir I am law graduate from burdwan university of the year 2008 but didn't enroll myself in any bar council at that time due to some personal issues. But now I want to sit in judicial exam and for that enrollment is required. Can I enroll myself now. I ask this because presently I work in government aided school. Can I apply for enrollment, sir. My motive is to sit for judicial exam and not to practice law before any court of law.please suggest......... Girijesh kumar Mehta
girijesh kumar Mehta
14 February 2016 at 09:10
Sir I completeevelaw degree in the year 2008 but I could not enroll myself in the bar council. Now I work as a teacher in government aided school .my question is that can I get enrollment now. I want to sit for judicial exam and in almost every state enrollment is prerequisites for filling up the form because of this pre-condition I could not fill any form. Please suggest.
gopinathan
14 February 2016 at 03:45
Mr. Expert in Tamilnadu State Commercial Tax dept. there is no post of Asst Commercial Tax Officer nowadays. But earlier it was live. Can u tell from when and in which G.O this post is abolished.
Damayanti
13 February 2016 at 21:58
Family Court Appeal before BOM HC.
Please please somebody give me format at least some template (which causes ZERO objection right on the day of filing of the same)
Its all stuck in objections.
I cant pay mumbai lawyer from my pocket for my client. The party is really poor. I am doing for her two small kids(husband abandoned all of them due disability in one child)
There are more objections raised as to format of FCA (I tried to draft it like a Civil Writ Petition that we had filed at BOM HC) .......................... even prayer (I can't believe this. Form 90 in Original side rules inBOM HC does not prescribe prayer!! then where to assert the relie sought?)
I don't want to go wrong. there are already many problems and intricacies in her case (lack of proper handling of her case has really caused her destitution)
So far I have filed only CRAs vide Art. 227 against some stand alone orders(only maint orders) which got over in 3 or 4 hearings (unfortunately many got dismissed in limine)
Please help
Vijayalakshmi
13 February 2016 at 20:50
If an investor of a mutual fund requests to mark a normal lien and the financier requests for a dynamic lien, which one should the mutual fund act upon
Dr.shamshad
13 February 2016 at 20:06
sir I am shamshad my change my religion Hindu to Muslim and did second marriage with a Hindu married women .and she field a divorce petition for her ex husband.and now she took ex party divorce.and she also change her religion Hindu to Muslim.now her ex husband lodge istahgasa in court under section 497,498.so sir how this is possible and how to take relief in this case.plz suggest me.it's a humble request to you.as such possible.thanks.
Damayanti
13 February 2016 at 19:31
Cross Exam. New Allegations in Evidence in chief of plaintiff.
New allegations are ridden with half truth but are grave due to the half truth apparently.
Respondent first raises objection to those new allegation in exam in chief affidavit.
Court says. "Evidence pertaining to pleadings /framed issues only be read" in evidence even if affidavit contains new allegations.
Thereafter, Respondent goes ahead confronts petitioner as to those allegations and takes denial on record, but while asking those question the respondent has to first admit to the first half truth and then go for 'confession and avoidance'
New judge got appointed thereafter.
New Court passed judgment saying asking questions in cross on those new allegations caused to bind the respondent, hence judge can't ignore those allegations and can't call them "traveling beyond pleading" anymore.
Is it in contravention to
pleading - say - framing -burden - evidence flow of fact finding?
Respondent asked those question in view to weaken the testimony of plaintiff.
Even if plaintiff had pleaded those allegation right from beginning, respondent never had any discomfort in answering to those, but at least respondent would have got opportunity to answer them in its entirety.
Please advise.
Dr g balakrishnan Sir,
Doesn't that amount to a inserting new 'cause of action' or 'amendment to pleading' by the Petitioner but without giving opportunity to Respondent to reply?
Judge passed judgment soly on that point
our contention is that 'had the petitioner pleaded that allegation right in the beginning, respondent had no hesitation to respond to it in detail wherein he would have exposed the half truth of plaintiff (half truth is more dangerous than plain vanilla lie).
But this sudden new allegation not only surprised the Respondent but he was deprived to answer it properly.
Is it not a back door channel to amend the pleading also not giving opportunity to respond (against the principles of natural justice)
Plaintiff's hands were not tied to plead leave of new addition and then again going through the pleading - say - burden assignment exercise.
Whole procedural flow is bypassed here.
How to put it concise words?
Please advise.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
draft a mortgage deed
Draft a mortgage deed