Suresh
19 January 2017 at 00:58
Dear Sir
I have entered into an agreement to purchase land at mancherial mandal (adilabad district, telangana). The pahani(s) show that the land is a "38E - Patta". I have obtained pahanis from 1965, all of pahanis after 1975 show the current pattedar as the patta holder with "38E - patta". Before 1975, I can see most of the survey numbers (before/after the survey number i am intending to purchase) show one name in pattedar column. So this confirms that the current owner got the land through land ceiling (Protected tenant)
My concerns:
1. The current owner is owning the 38E patta from 1975, is it okay for me to proceed to buy the land? or do I have to obtain the 38E certificate? If so, where to obtain the 38E certificate
2. The current owner has Ac 6.00 Gunta in the passbook/pahanis. Does it mean he owns the total Ac 6.000 Gunta OR he owns the 60% of land? Please bear with me, as this is only for clarification....as some people told me about the 60%.
3. What other things I have to do to make sure I am buying the legal land
Pls suggest me clear about 38e ....
Rajeshkumar
19 January 2017 at 00:08
I am from tamilnadu. we know that the PF contribution is divided into 3 contributions. In that, I want to know about pension contribution of EPFO. After resigning a job from a establishment, can i get that pension contribution amount or not? If the answer is no, when i will get that pension contribution? After resigning a job which contribution i will get? What is the eligibility to get Pension from the same EPF organisation? Kindly advise me....
priyanka pai
18 January 2017 at 23:08
Sir,
There is a out of court Deed of Settlement entered in to between the Complainant and Accused during the pendency of proceedings filed in the criminal complaint u/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.The said Deed of Settlement is duly signed and notarised.
The trial has started. Complainant has filed its Evidence and Cross-examination of Complainant Witness has already been completed prior to the execution of above mentioned Deed of Settlement. However, the settlement has failed.
Complainant desires to lead further evidence by bringing second witness. So, in this case,can the above mentioned Deed of Settlement be filed in the list of documents alongwith the said Affidavit of Evidence of second witness?
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
18 January 2017 at 22:10
Sir,
As per muslim law, how the share of the deceased son will devolve, can the share of the deceased son go to his wife and what would be the percentage?
Regards,
Rizwan Shaikh
Imtiyaz ahmad rather
18 January 2017 at 21:15
Sir
Kindly inform is it necessary to obtain permission from department under law for higher studies through distance mode.
Besides if yes kindly inform what is procedure to legalize the degree if leave has taken on examination dates..
PPBiswas
18 January 2017 at 20:59
In 2008,promotion from CMO to CMO(NFSG) was denied to me due to uncommunicated below benchmark ACR in 2006.I'd appealed to CAT for upgradation of ACR but my appeal was turned down by CAT in 2013. Then in 2013,I filed a writ petion in high court for cancellation of below benchmark ACR. While admitting my case, HC asked my office to submit written reply within three weeks,which they have not done yet. But for more than three years, my case did not get any date in high court.
My question is, can I file a fresh case in CAT for cancellation of my adverse ACR for 2006, since my first case was for upgrade of this ACR? Now it appears that it is easier to get dates in CAT compared to high court. Please advise how to expedite my case.
Mitul
18 January 2017 at 15:55
How to know that will is registered or not.?
My grandfather's will is missing and every person is deniying its possession and its registeration.
santhosh.g.
18 January 2017 at 13:43
is proof affidavit is permissible in 125 cr.p.c as evidence of petitioner
Rajendra
18 January 2017 at 13:32
Dear Ms. Usha Kapoor Madam,
Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and
Their Advocates tendered, taken on record and marked “X”.
Decree in terms of Consent Terms.
Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Prothonotary to act on the Minutes.
Smt. Ramrati Radheshyam Gupta ) . . . . PLAINTIFF
Versus
1. Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta )
2. Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta )
3. Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta )
4. Kamla Ramdeo Gupta )
5. Devendra Radheshyam Gupta )
6. Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta ) . . . . DEFENDANTS
CONSENT TERMS
1. The Defendants waive service of Writ of Summons.
2. Defendants admit that the properties described in Ex ‘A’ to the plaint were the property of Hindu Undivided Family consisting of plaintiffs and defendants.
3. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that under an Agreement of Family Settlement dated 1.10.1998 at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint, defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta received from the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta a sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434494 dated 25-1-1999 and another sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434495 dated 2-2-1999 drawn on Shramik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Sakinaka, Mumbai branch totaling to Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) in full and final payments of the value of their share in the property mentioned at Ex ‘A’ to the plaint and in consideration therof they have relinquished, released and surrendered all their right Title and interest therein in favour of the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta. Defendants admit the correctness of the contents of the said Agreement of Family Settlement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint. Defendants further admit that they have duly signed the said Agreement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint after being read over the same to them in Hindi language. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that they have now no right title and interest of any nature whatsoever in the said property described in Ex ‘A’ to the Plaint.
4. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, agree and undertake that they will neither interfere with the management of the said property by the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta as exclusive owner thereof, nor shall they interfere in getting the said property transferred in the name of plaintiff And defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta.
5. Decree in terms of Consent Terms.
6. No order as to cost.
NOW PLEASE GIVE SUGGESTION TO BELOW MENTIONED MY QUERY :
IF PLAINTIFF EXPIRED AND DEFENDANT NO.1 IS ALSO EXPIRED AND THE GIVEN RIGHTS WERE NOT EXECUTED IN 17 YEARS BY THE RIGHTS HOLDER i.e. DEFENDANT NO. 5 & 6.
NOW I WANT TO KNOW THAT IF RIGHTS WERE NOT EXECUTED IN 17 YEARS BY THE DEFENDANT S NO. 5 & 6,CAN DEFENDANTS NO. 5 & 6 WERE EXECUTE IT NOW?
If possible give me your address for personally meeting & showing documents to you personally
Thanks & Regards
Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta
9222211660
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Car parking space dimensions - gated communities in hyerabad
Hi,
I am one of the Flat Owners in a Gated community of 200+ flats in Hyderabad.Builder has called all owners this Saturday for Parking allotment and We are sure that parking demarcation/lining done by him is wrong and it leads to provding very small parking space for a Car.
Can you please enlighten us with the standard Car parking Space dimensions for a Flat in Gated community in Hyderabad as per GHMC/HMDA and as per law.