Vijayalakshmi
30 December 2017 at 17:09
I am providing the details regarding the FDR invested with one of the private firm named Jindal Cotex Ltd.
The amount invested is for Rs 30,000/- dated 14-12-2011 and maturity amount was to be 43,400 with maturity date 13/12/2014. When we tried to contact these people, we are unable to do so as the given number on the printed document was out of service or not available.
To our heavy efforts and repeated contact at last we had a word with them on March 2016 over the phone the executive at the office picked up and said that we will receive the money in three installment in three years in 2017,2018,and 2019.
The amount details with dates is as follows:-
1.) 18,128 13-12-2017
2) 19471 13-12-2018
3.) 20813 13-12-2019
When we are contacting them now at the given numbers, the IVR tells the number's are temporarily out of service as the first payment details is nearing the given date.The registered office is situated at Ludiana
Their address and contact number is as follows:-
Jindal Cotex Ltd.
VPO JUGIANA,
G.T. ROAD,
LUDHIANA-141420
TEL:- 0161 2511840-42 fax;-91 0161 2511843.
Please have a look at it and let us know if you need any other details,as I provided the maximum available detail. You can contact my mother at ,09421692335,08669869533,09823288393.
regards
vijayalakshmi
Manashi Pathak
30 December 2017 at 16:46
A leased out a property to B for 24 years. Said deed was duly registered. In the meantime both A & B expired during continuance of lease deed. Now whether a supplementary lease deed is to be executed between the legal heirs of A & B or no supplementary lease deed is to be executed as the legal heirs will automatically will step into the shoes of their deceased parents and the previous lease deed would continue.
Anonymous
30 December 2017 at 16:43
A leased out a property to B for 24 years. Said deed was duly registered. In the meantime both A & B expired during continuance of lease deed. Now whether a supplementary lease deed is to be executed between the legal heirs of A & B or no supplementary lease deed is to be executed as the legal heirs will automatically will step into the shoes of their deceased parents and the previous lease deed would continue.
Anonymous
30 December 2017 at 15:34
My father purchased land from SC around 50 years back.. now he died..his grand sons only THERE and fighting for land with us now.
vipinfo
30 December 2017 at 14:45
I presented a cheque to my bank which has been dishonoured and the reason mentioned in the memo is eKYC await - present again.
As far as I have read, this reason is not mentioned in the list issued by R.B.I for returning the cheque and bank should have mentioned a more valid reason to return the cheque.
Also the sender of the cheque has corporate account so I dont think bank can freeze his account and return the cheque just because KYC is not updated.
Also Is it a valid reason (eKYC await - present again) to initiate legal proceedings against the person who gave me this cheque?
Rakesh
30 December 2017 at 14:20
My name is rakesh. and wife name is pooja.We both got are married 15th may 2015 . Main problem is Communication gap between me and ma wife.i am working in night shift.she worked in general shift. We did not went for honeymoon (Due to some financial issue) .we have twice argument fight s between me and wife at my private home. We both are meet only on Saturday and Sunday. She has some salary issue at home.(my wife salary approx 10000).she is not taking lunch box to office. She going to Morning 8 to come home at 8 :30 in the evening.my grandfather admitted in hospital . Her mom came to my home taken her to her mom's home.She's also not proper communicating at home. If office is Holiday than also She is going to office . She left home in January 2016. We are trying to get back to home from last 2 years .we sent notice,letter....etc.Many time she's not listening .she don't want come and she want divorce. And demand compensate.p lease suggest what I need to do.
Sai
30 December 2017 at 12:04
There is a G+2 building registered as a common property with my name and my brother's name. In General+2 my brother lives in the first floor. I live in the second floor with my family. In the ground floor front portion is built as a shop. Back portion is two rooms in which tenants stay. My brother uses the shop in the front side of ground floor and pays very less rent. So I want to divide the shop into two parts by constructing a wall and take my part. But my brother refuses to build a wallm If I have to build wall and take my part how can I proceed legally ? Under whose direction can I build the wall
Anonymous
30 December 2017 at 11:49
There is a G+2 building registered as a common property with my name and my brother's name. In General+2 my brother lives in the first floor. I live in the second floor with my family. In the ground floor front portion is built as a shop. Back portion is two rooms in which tenants stay. My brother uses the shop in the front side of ground floor and pays very less rent. So I want to divide the shop into two parts by constructing a wall and take my part. But my brother refuses to build a wallm If I have to build wall and take my part how can I proceed legally ? Under whose direction can I build the wall
ravi
30 December 2017 at 11:43
Our grand grand father got some land by the way of granted land (dharakast) in 1931 and the same land auctioned by court for some reason in 1940-1941 and someone got that land in auction but before they got occupancy on that land our grand father\'s did some convince and taken the same land for rs 600 by the way of registration. So my question is , is this land is now treated as granted kand or general land?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Change of name of owner in Taxbill
Dear sir. My aunty apply for change of name of owner in taxbill of her house at AHMEDABAD municipal corporation twice after the death of her husband. House is owned by my aunt's husband. AMC only change the name of occupier as my aunt's name but still my uncle name as it is as owner. Even in RTI they only reply that your application proceeded infact name of owner still shown in my uncle's name only my aunt's name affix as occupier. What she can do for this