Anonymous
18 April 2018 at 11:24
Is civil suit maintainable for claiming damages for mental depression and agony for abrupt removal from services
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
18 April 2018 at 10:11
Hello all learned
Can original complainant after the completion of charge –sheet file papers against accused in the court whatever original complainant had ?
Regards
Anonymous
18 April 2018 at 07:52
Hello,
I am Vignesh from Chennai. My Mother passed away recently and she has a plot (2400 sq ft) with ground floor & first floor house build. The property is registered under my mother's name.Myself and my older brother would be inheriting the property. Both myself and my brother have a liking for ground floor house and not keen on taking first floor house.So in this case, my suggestion was to have the complete property registered under both myself and brothers name, from mothers name instead of having first floor house registered to one person and ground floor registered to another person.Is this a possible option?
If not, please suggest other possible ways to work this out.
Thanks
Riaz Noor
18 April 2018 at 00:54
I am an 74 year old widow. My husband and son had taken a loan of rs 37 lakhs from sbi to set up a petrol pump. The business could not start up but inspite of all dofficultiez we paid back an amount of rs 57 lakhs to thebank. Since my husband died in 2014 and my son is unemployed we failed to pay to the bank. The bank issued notice under sarfesai act to take possession of my house. We got an stay from high court. We approched the bank for ots. The bank issued an ots letter stating to settle the loan by paying 13 lakhs in 6 months. With my limited resources i could pay 4 lakhs only within 6 months. I requested the bank to give me another 3 months to pay the rest amount of 9 lakhs. But they are refusing me and they say that they have applied for dm permission to take possession of my house. Please advice me
Urjit Shukla
18 April 2018 at 00:53
Dear all Experts,
Wether Megistrate can modify any condition which is imposed by him after granting bail u/s 437??
Plz cite some Judgments if any.
Thanks...
Urjit Shukla
18 April 2018 at 00:46
Dear all Experts,
Wether Megistrate can modify any condition which is imposed by him after granting bail u/s 437??
Plz cite some Judgments if any.
Thanks...
Umesh Pandurang Jadhav
18 April 2018 at 00:42
Ronika and manish married on 10-10-15, husband & wife running their case in family court .
In beginning Manish filled petition for divorce from Ronika...
Even Ronika gave replied to Manish's notice and submitted W.S on 10-3-17 in family court..
In mean time Ronika declared under oath on affidavit regarding marital status as UNMARRIED ...on 20-10-16
Manish received her affidavit of unmarried via RTI and submitted to family court judge ..
Now Manish is for cross examination stage in family court..
My questions as follow :-
1.is it possible for defence lawyer to take cross examination of Manish , even though Ronika being marriage status , she declare in public on affidavit that she is unmarried n in WS she wrote she is married ??
2.is it possible for Manish to request judge for no cross examination ....bcoz her wife declared unmarried on affidavit , then under which act or section judge can pass the no cross examination order?
3.which criminal cases can launch against Ronika ? As she told court she is married and want Maintance & on another side in public she take oath on affidavit that she is unmarried ...
Anonymous
18 April 2018 at 00:25
Hello I need some advice from an expert in co-op banking as there are none in my state. Thanks!
Consumer Complainant
18 April 2018 at 00:12
Can petitoner/ respondents recording court proceedings on mobile phone by audio legal?
Hon Supreme Court has said like this
What is the need for privacy in courts?: SC allows both audio and video recording of proceedings
Justice AK Goel held that the earlier order on installing CCTV cameras in court complexes was in ‘larger public interest’.
What is the need for privacy in courts?: SC allows both audio and video recording of proceedings
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed audio and video recording of proceedings in courtrooms, saying judges do not require privacy in the court, The Hindu reported.
Justice AK Goel, who presided over the matter along with Justice UU Lalit, dismissed concerns that such a move would infringe upon the privacy of judicial minds. “There is no privacy in a court, we are sitting here for all,” he said.
The court had mulled over the move in August by expanding the scope of a plea filed by petitioner Pradyuman Bisht, who had urged the bench to direct the government to install closed-circuit television cameras in criminal courts to ensure fair trial.
On Tuesday, the bench asked the Centre how much progress it had made on its earlier order that said surveillance cameras must be installed inside courtrooms and court complexes in at least two districts across states and Union Territories, PTI reported.
When Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, who was representing the Centre, asked the court for more time to file a status report, Justice Goel said the government should “not prolong matters”.
“Do not delay it,” the bench said. “This step is in larger public interest, discipline and security.”
The Supreme Court will take up the matter for further hearing on Thursday.
https://scroll.in/latest/858713/what-is-the-need-for-privacy-in-courts-sc-allows-both-audio-and-video-recording-of-proceedings
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding giving portion of my shop on rent
Hello Sir,
As business is now a days going through tough time . I want to give a half portion of my shop to some eating spot. Kindly guide me if I am to get some permission from Municipal Corporation as my shop is in MC limits.
Regards
Harmeet Singh
jbdocumentation@gmail.com