LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

RAJINDER KUMAR GARG   27 February 2009 at 14:13

DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY

WHAT IS THE VALUE OF DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY REPORT IN A PROCEEDING PENDING IN CIVIL COURT/ CONSUMER FORUM?

Abhishek Thakur   27 February 2009 at 13:00

partion of property

there is a guy who is hindu and is adopted by muslim now he wanted to marry a hindu garl and he changed his religion to hindu and got married and had a son and a daugter later his wife died and he again converted to muslim and again got married now he again had 3 sons so how we r going to divide his property and his former children will have the same right ?

sudha   27 February 2009 at 11:13

what is Black Law Dictionary?

Will you please tell me what is black Law Dictionary means? If you have soft copy will you send me..
sudha

T.V.Ramana Rao   27 February 2009 at 10:06

Payment of Gratuity

Whether the teachers / lecturers of a private unaided institutions are eligible for payment of gratuity under payent of gratuity act 1972? If yes, to whom to contact if the institute denies to pay gratuity?
I came to know that the parliament recently amended this act. Is it correct?

sanjay   27 February 2009 at 05:52

how to turn summons case in warrant triable ?

in a case u/s 138 NI act, during trial it is proved that- accused had given cheque of his husband's account, i want to join his husband as a accused and turn the case in warrant triable u/s 420, 114 IPC, there is a provision in 221 & 319 , but court require citation on that point ,
i want to turn this case warrant triable and proceed against the accused in same trial .

davinder   26 February 2009 at 19:50

false case

i own a premises,after 8 months, i write a complain to electric department for checking the meters,they visited my premises and found that one of my four meter is defected,and also said in their reports that the body seal of the meter is ok,they advice their departments to change the meter and ammendments,but they failed to do so,after 14 months of their first visit, their another department came to my premises and raid the one meter of mine which is already in their notice that this is defected meter,they make temper meter case on me, that u temper the meter,and make a claim of 4,70000+54000 claim of compound amount, they make payment from me Rs 2,62000 by force teling me if u donot pay such a amount now with few hour we will drag u in police station,they also said pay such a amount today and u can meet our senior tommorow he listen to u and decided are innocent or not but pay first. if any one has good advice for case please reply me

Sonia Sharma   26 February 2009 at 17:35

Need help to start Practice

Dear Sir / Madam,

My name is Sonia Sharma, I have done Law in 1997. I would like to practice law now. Now i am staying in Delhi. I am looking for help and guidance to start practicing now.

May some one please guide me how to go about it.

Regards,

Sonia

Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate   26 February 2009 at 16:32

consumer case

dear friends,hello.i am facing some problem regarding my case in consumer forum.I filed a consumer case in distt.consumer fourm ageinst electricity dipartment.in this case the father of plentiff had apllied for an electricity connection in 1991,which was not issued till he died in 1999, and now his 2 sons are left behind and the electricity deptt.despite of the fact that there are no wires or poles whatsoever(it is a tube well connection)till date, has generated the bill w.e.f 1991.his sons presented an application to S.D.M. office complaining of the bill and connection.after the complaint the elec.deptt. isuued electricity pole and wires in '94 but it was not connected as the result the above sais equipment is still lying idle at the site of connection,but the bill is still being generated every month.aggrieved form this exercise one of the son filed a consumer complaint.an advocate commission was carried out by the forum and the complaint was found to be true.now this case is in final arguements.some days earlier state forum,lucknow,passed a ruling that consumer is the one in whose name is the connection as a result one cannot be a consumer untill he has a connection on his name. my queries are as below.
1.)as per section 2 of C.P.act the legal hiers are the consumers.so that makes the son a consumer.but,disst.forum,due to State Forum,lucknow's ruling denies that the son being a consumer.and the view of distt,fourm is also with the state fourm i.e-son is not consumer whenever he is not named on the regd.connection.
2.he left two sons behind,and the case has been filed by only one son with the consent of the other son,but the consent is not on the file.then what is the status of this complaint?
3.any amendment on this stage will make my case better? if itis possible then how (only final argument is left now )suggest me ????????????? s.k.sharma advocate

GOPI KRISHNA   26 February 2009 at 16:20

whether Release deed is valid based on settlement deed

A executed a settlement deed in the year 1953, his self acquired property to his wife as life interest, thereafter the property shall be enjoyed by his daughter during her life time as life interest and after the death of daughter the property will be passed on to her children i.e A's grand children who will have absolute power to dispose the property. the Settlor A died in the year 1980.
in the year 1981 A's wife and daughter who have only life interest along with two grand children have executed a release deed in favour of other grand son in respect of property shown in settlement deed.

the releasee/other grand son has constructed an apartment in the year 1988 now wants to sell the apartment
my question is whether execution of above referred release deed is valid and whether an apartment can be bought based on the above deeds.

Hiren   26 February 2009 at 16:18

Whether Stamp Duty Payable on Addendum of an Agreement

A Company (A Ltd) has given an Inter Corporate Deposit (ICD) of Rs. 1 Crore to another Company (B Ltd) for a period of 90 days @ 15% p.a.

On the original ICD Agreement appropriate stamp duty was paid.

The payment period was extended by A Ltd and an Addendum No. 1 to the Original ICD Agreement was executed between A Ltd and B Ltd.

My Query is whether on the Addendum No. 1 Stamp Duty is to be paid and if it is payable than at what rate it has to be paid?


Regards

CS Hiren