Amit Goyal
26 September 2009 at 17:21
Both the parties to marriage filed petition u/s 13-B. and a date after 6 months fixed for reconsiliation but on that day if one party never comes before the court ... can the court passed decree of divorce with consideration that the consent given at the time of filing of the petition is still continuing becasue that party never withdrew his/her consent.
sharwan kumar mishra
26 September 2009 at 17:09
sir
if trust registered from delhi then i will open other state branch,it is possible?
sneha
26 September 2009 at 16:23
can u please provide a draft Memorandum of Understanding between the service providers.
sneha
26 September 2009 at 16:18
What rights and benefit lies with the company who has obtained copyrights?
sharwan kumar mishra
26 September 2009 at 15:56
sir
i want open school for social purpose and registered under trust act but one problem faced by me,i want open school in 4 state e.g.bihar,delhi,u.p and utrakhan.am i lible for registration for all state or not.
Bhushan V. Kale
26 September 2009 at 14:29
Our factory is getting power supply from the electricity pole standing at western side of building, since last more than 40 yrs. Said pole is nearby the building and most safe.
All of a sudden, MSEDCL (Maharashtra Stat Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.) cut the power supply from that pole and connected it from the pole standing at northern side of building.
There is Govt. road in between the factory building and newly connected pole. heavy traffic flowing throuth the road. There is public as well as privet nuicense.
I have file suit for mandatory injunction against the MSEDCL along with the appliction of temporary injunction.
is there any chanse of success ?
pls. inform me if there are some rulings in favour or against me.
Thanks.
Shujath Khan
26 September 2009 at 13:58
Hello Sir,
I am a student of Medical College while coming back home on my bike where one boy from the lane where his house is come out suddenly on a bike where I and the person in other direction both applied the sudden brake without hitting the boy who came suddenly we both fall dawn.
The other person as soon as he got up abuse the boy who came suddenly in front and hold the collar of the shirt, where people around the street separated them with that he took his bike and left.
During that time I got up taken out my helmet, collected my belongings which got scattered like my medical apron, books and about to lift my fallen bike the boy who came in front suddenly from the lane where his house is 2 to 3 more boys came whom he was referring as his big brothers started hitting me
One Big Boy given a Blow on my Eye, a hard punch on my right ear and suddenly one more came with Iron Rod from the house and hit on my head which started bleeding badly – If the rod had hit an inch away I might have died with the brain ham rage.
About 100 meters away there is police station from where cops came by then and boys who hit me left the place soon after that. The 2 constables took me to the police station from where I call my family members where my house is about 2 kms from the place of incident they came immediately and took me to the hospital where I got about 5 stitches on my head and big bruise on my left eye and below the right ear on the neck.
One of the cop visited the hospital and took my statement and promise that he will find the culprits who did this, but its past 24 hrs police has not done anything and when inquired they said they are not able to find who did that, but everyone on the street the shopkeepers, and people residing there they knew well who did that and who are the ones. I am very sure Police also knows who did that but keeping the eyes close.
Please guide me what steps I can take and whom all I can approach to make sure the people who injured me get punish by the law and next time dare not think of repeating this incident to anyone else.
Appreciate your reply ASAP
kranthi kiran
26 September 2009 at 12:39
A has been issued with 38-E, Ownership Certificate, under A.P.(T.A) Tenancy & Agril Lands Act. The said certificate issued to A with the consent of the Protected Tenent only. A is daughter's son of Protected Tenant. After 33 Years the said order is challenged by the sons of the Protected Tenant (P.T)before the High Court in the Year 2007. Apart from that the sons of said P.T filed a suit for partition before the District Court in the year 2009. The sons already know taht the land is already alienated by A way back in 2005 and have even stated the same in the Plaint. The subsequent vendees are also made parties. My client is one of the such boandfide purchaser.
Can the property be treated as ancestral.
Does the suit is barred by limitation, though there is no limitation for filing partition suit.
Please give some suggetions for preparing for W.S
m.v.prabhakar
26 September 2009 at 11:51
Sir,
I Shall be glad to have your comment/opinion on the following facts.
A special judge – CBI ( ACB) was hearing on the argument on charges against the discharge petition of an accused. There was no pecuniary loss/gain on the date of sanction to any parties. Instead of either discharging/framing of charges, he had added one more person (A company thro its authorized representative) as an accused and given a new date. That company is already under BIFR and not function for a long time. Prosecution had informed that court that the factory is not functioning and no one is available to serve the notice. Incidentally the CMD of the company is one of the four accused and got exemption through HC for non appearance before the spl. Court.
My questions are.
1. Can the judge is correct in including a new accused at the time of framing of charges. I believe that the judge, at the time of framing charge has to see prima-fascia any case is made out against the accused or not, based on the charge sheet made available to him. If he is not correct pl. support me with any case laws. If he is correct also pl. proved the relevant case laws.
2. Can a Company under BIFR (Closed/Locked/No Operation) or its authorized representative be made as an accused.
3. Since the CMD of the company is already an accused and obtained exemption from non appearance from HC, can the Spl. Judge invoke the exemption and ask the CMD to appear Him for any further clarification.
4. There is one directive from HC ( against the petition u/S 482) obtained by one of the accused that the case should be disposed off on the next hearing date. The above development had taken place after the directive from the HC.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
"employer" means in terms of section 2 (g) (ii) of I D Act
Ld. Member please suggest whether a limited company especially a stock broking comany fall under the definition of employer, given in section 2(g)(ii) if the I D Act
Here is section 2 (g) of I D Act
(g) "employer" means - (i) in relation to an industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of the Central Government or a State Government, the authority prescribed in this behalf, or where no authority is prescribed, the head of the department;
(ii) in relation to an industry carried on by or on behalf of a local authority, the chief executive officer of that authority;
Thanking you