Residential Permit

Dear Sir/Madam,
I am shasankha das now i got indian residentship by Marriage.

dispute between father and son

sir,
my father and me jointly own a property. the ownership rights is only towards vacant land. only ground floor is constructed out of the land and i am staying in the property with father and my wife. after a while, due to differences between us he stays with sister. he proposed to develop the property by adding more floors in the building a let it out for rent. as i was in good terms he asked to enter into agreement and collect the rent myself. i started to receive the rents but after a while he changed his mind and now asking me to vacate the house and hand over the property to him. all negotiations failed. he is not budging. please advise me. am i having legal right. to what extent. what will be my position if he goes to court.

dispute between father and son

sale of property

Hi,

I have sold my property to a builder for rupees 41.40 lakhs under just a sale agreement on Rs 100 and took a due of 3 months which are going to end on 1st of jan now due to dispute in my family we are not willing to sell the property we have recived EARNEST MONEY rs 5 lakhs and we are ready to return it can i cancel this agreement its written in agreement that i cannot sell the said property to any onelse other than the builder .

I am also agree to go with deal if the builder provides me sum of ruppes 60 lakhs i want it to increse the sale amount can i do so

i still have papers and the orginal doc. of property like u no. chaltha no. plan copy . but i dont have SANATH of the property its also written on the plan that its proprty belongs to maharashtra shashan and possession is with us

i still live there

what should i do to cancel the agreement ? or to get the amount increased and the bulder is not ready to give



please answer

karan

law member

Regarding under value of the suit property

The property belongs to Delhi and at present the market value of the suit property is Rs. 57 lacs. If the property is undevalued by one of the legal share holder then the suit can be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC or an amendment petition can be submitted in the concerned court afresh and related judgements.

Pecuniary jurisdiction

The total cost of the suit property as per Delhi Government circle rate is Rs. 57,72,888. The property belongs to three class I legal share holders. Kindly specify the pecuniary jurisdiction of one legal share holder as well as the requisite court fee to be submitted in the concerned court and where the case is to be be filed?

Also specify whether the case can be dismissed under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC being without pecuniary jurisdiction or whether an amendment petition in connection with pecuniary jurisdication and fees can be submitted afresh and related court orders?

Mutual divorce

13 B is applicable on hindus but which law is applicable if both are christian.?
and under which section they can got divorce and what is the Time period required to file the divorce, Is it 18 months or 1 one year and under which law?

service tax

A partnership was entered into orally and they started as franchisees for a reputed Beauty chain.They have also collected service tax for the last 5 months but not paid it.Now a formal partnershipdeed is being executed& susequently pan & ST No will be obtained.
Now , are they supposed to pay the entire service tax collected alongwith interest, penalty for late payment,fees for late registration &fees for late filing of return. Or are they supposed to deposit the amount collected prior to the date of registration of deed under Section 73A (amt wronfully collected)collected)& apply for registration with effect from the date of execution of deed.For the purpose of service tax act,does a partnership come into existence only on execution of the deed.
Remember, the threshold limit of 10Lakhs does not apply since taxable services are being provided under the brand name of another person & hence the are liable to collect service tax right from the commencement of the business.
Hence for ST purposes When has the business actually commenced.? Pls guide me.

304(a)IPC

The appelant is convicted u/s 304(A)and undergo sentence for 2 years.

The fact is that the evidence of all eye witness is contrary to each other and non says how the accident took place and not known on whose negligence the accident took place.

The deceased is an school girl aged 8 years who get down from the appelant van. the appelant without noticing her that she was at front of the van driven the vehicle.thus the accident took place.

send judgements to get over

498A

sir pl u tell me leading case judgment on 498A where accused get relief.