sir,
My grand father had expired in 1996.He had 6 acres of agricultural land which he had inherited from his father(my great grand father) and 2 houses out of which one was purchased by my grandfather.My grand mother is alive.My grand father has
2 sons and 1 daughter(I am her dauhter's son).My grand father had died without writing a will or distributing property.Since then my grand mother is residing in the house inherited by her husband.Now my uncles are claiming that since it is ancestral property they both will get 3 acres each and one house each.My question is can my grand mother claim for right in property,if so how much share will she get since her husband had earned only one house and rest of it is inherited and also can my mother claim for property and how much share will she get.My mother was married 23 years ago.
Dear M'm / Sir,
Please enlighten me on the case laws regarding forwarding of applications of central government officers within Government of india for taking up employment in another organisation.
with best regards
As per Karnataka Value Added Tax Act.2003 revised return shall be filled within six months. If a dealer files revised return after six months claiming more input than the original return, department reject the excess input tax in revised return. Can they reject the same ? Is there any legal remedy for the same. pl quote any case law for claiming input tax after six months
In a matter before the CLB under S.397 & 398 of Companies Act, wherein there are one petitioner and five respondents, the CLB passes an order, on an application being made by a proposed respondent, impleading the petitioner as the sixth respondent. Against this order of impleadment, the petitioner takes an appeal to the High court under S.10/f of the companies act. In the appeal, one of the respondents files a M.P., seeking a direction against one other respondent on an issue which is connected with the main petition before the CLB, but no way connected with the matter in appeal. Is the M.P. maintenable ? if so, on what grounds? and if Not, on what grounds? Would our experts enlighten me please?
My name is Farheen. I have done my M.com from Shivaji University in 2000. I want to do LLB. I want to know if it can be done by correspondence in Mumbai.
Sir, plz clear me the difference between Order, Dcree, and Judgement.Can appeal be filed against each of them ?
What is interlocutary orders?
Can the parties by agreement decide any place their juridiction by agreement which is neither their residence place, work place or cause of action ?
plz clear the above points in simple language.
thanks in advance.
Respected experts,
We r two persons 'A' and 'B' living in different locations. Both have some lands situated in each other's locality. Some portion of land of'A' is situated adjacent to 'B's house and some portion of land of 'B' situated adjacent to 'A's house. Both are agree and wants to exchange the respective portions of land. Consulted local lawyer on this, they say that both have to do separate registry in each other's name, which is costing a lot. Can it be done thro' exchange deed? If possible pls send exchange deed. Can they exchange in any other cheaper way? THanks and regards.
To the Expert panelists
Home> Experts > Taxation > valuation of jewellery under wealth tax
In one of the reply in above link, about valuation of Jewelry, Shri Pkpworld has indicated on date 13th Nov'09 that:
"Wealth tax will be charged @ 1% on the net wealth including jewelry in excess of Rs.15 lakhs on the valuation date (31st March of the Previous Year)."
Will any one please let me know about the wealth Tax? What all is considered for valuing wealth? Few like:
(1) Bank account balance.FD etc (2) Jewelry.(3) Stock and Share valuation.(4)Units of Mutual Fund-Valuation.(5) Residential property occupied by the self for living purpose.(6) Any commercial property.(7) Residential Plot.(8) Other residential accommodation –which is not Self occupied
and any thing more which is to be considered for wealth Tax. I do not know how to continue and take part in the old query, so I have asked a fresh query for a guidance.
Bhasker Parikh
Email Id:bhasker.parikh@gmail.com
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ---- PRINCIPLE OF HIGHEST IMPORTANCE --DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF LAWYER AND JUDGES--SUBJECTIVE MOODS, PREDICTIONS, EMOTIONS AND PREJUDICES OF JUDGES HAVE NO PLACE IN IMPARTING FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JUSTICE.
[PARA 19,20]
1998 SUPREME APPEALS REPORTER [CIVIL] PAGE 407.
M/S CHETAK CONSTRUCTION LTD.V/S OM PRAKASH &OTHERS.