LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

raju   26 November 2009 at 17:18

dispute

dear sir, we have a property in delhi which was allotted to my father and his brother after partion of india against the properties of my grandfather in pakistan. the monetery amount for resettlement given to my father and uncle by the ministry of urban development was in ratio of 30% of my father and 70% of my uncle.now both my dad and uncle have expired and now the inheritants of my uncle are asking for a 70% share even though they have never entered our house for last 40 years as they are residing out of delhi..this property lease papers clearly state that 'division of property is not allowed'..on my side we have 3 inheritants i.e my mother,sister and myself..on my uncles side its also 3 inheretants i.e one brother and 2 sisters..now we want a settlement on the ratio of half and half on this property on the basis that we have been the only resident of the stated property for almost 40 years..my cousin wants to settle in ratio of 60% for him and wants to give us only 40%....does he have any legal right to enter a house occupied by only my family since past 40 years on the basis of illegal or legal grounds.please advice accordingly...thanks and regards..amit

Ria   26 November 2009 at 17:10

Case law urgently required

Respected experts,

Please provide me with case laws were the court has not allowed the setting aside of exparte decree.

raju   26 November 2009 at 17:10

property

dear sir, we have a property in delhi which was aquired by my father and his brother after partion of india.the monetery amount for resettlement was in ratio of 30% of my father and 70% of my uncle.now both my dad and uncle have expired and now the inheritants of my uncle are asking for a 70% share even though they have never entered our house for last 40 years as they are residing out of delhi..this property lease papers clearly state that 'division of property is not allwed'..on my side we have 3 inheritants i.e my mother,sister and myself..on my uncles side its also 3 inheretants i.e one brother and 2 sisters..now we want a settlement on the ratio of half and half on this property on the basis that we have been the only resident of the stated property for almost 40 years..my cousin wants to settle in ratio of 60% for him and wants to give us only 40%....does he have any legal right to enter a house occupied by only my family since past 40 years on the basis of illegal or legal grounds.please advice accordingly...thanks and regards..amit

Anonymous   26 November 2009 at 17:07

TRANSFER

I HAD A FLAT JOINTLY WITH MY UNCLE AUNT AND MYSELF ( IN THIS ORDER )

BOTH UNCLE AND AUNT EXPIRED.BY WAY OF A NOMINATION FILED THE SOCIETY HAS DELETED THE NAME OF THE FIRST TWO I.E UNCLE AND AUNT AND ADDED NAME OF THE NOMINEE.I NOW BECOME THE SECOND HOLDER.

IS THIS LEGALLY COREECT. CAN THE NOMINEES NAME COME AFTER MY NAME

PLEASE ADVICE.KINDLY REPLY TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS

Anonymous   26 November 2009 at 17:05

TRANSFER

I HAD A FLAT JOINTLY WITH MY UNCLE AUNT AND MYSELF ( IN THIS ORDER )

BOTH UNCLE AND AUNT EXPIRED.BY WAY OF A NOMINATION FILED THE SOCIETY HAS DELETED THE NAME OF THE FIRST TWO I.E UNCLE AND AUNT AND ADDED NAME OF THE NOMINEE.I NOW BECOME THE SECOND HOLDER.

IS THIS LEGALLY COREECT. CAN THE NOMINEES NAME COME AFTER MY NAME

PLEASE ADVICE

Anonymous   26 November 2009 at 17:05

private banking

i wanted to know what government stipulations govern private banking .?
also how NBFCs are different from private banks and is private banking done by them .if yes , r there any advantages .
what all is covered under private banking .

Bhaskaradeepak   26 November 2009 at 17:00

mental harrasement

Respected sirs,

A girl for telling about her past abuses and threatens me of suicide,i was affected emntally indeed gone for counselling sessions with one of my uncle who is an expert in moulding.Applied for frequent leaves and sufffered set back in carrier too.

After some time the girl messages from a number stating i ruined her life and she will never leave me happy and will take revenge.

After that some one claiming relatd to the girls calls my landline at midnight disturbs my parents,my father's health get affected.

Another person calls one of my friend whom i was in contact(i took this girl's help to ensure that girl is alive when she threatend of suicide) gets a call stating a complaint has been filed against her,that guy is from customer care since he is concerend he calls her to save her but she needs to share what are the things i shared witht hat girl that too by might 12 am.

I know my previous gf was behind all these.Can i fiel a single complaint against all these? sicne she has a father who was a heart patient i wanted to settle it off at family level.But no one from their family contacted inpersonor phone.

What can i do?if i opt for family settlement that too i want it legal way since they are highly untrustable,whats the procedures to be followed?

Else if iam going for legal case, i am not evens ure about her real address,even there are chances she might have given false name to me.But i have her photograph,since i met her in real i know its her only.How can i proceed?

Plz help me with your suggestions.If any of you can take care of this settlement too then its so fine.

Parveen Kr. Aggarwal   26 November 2009 at 16:51

interpretation of section 10(10A)(i) of I.T. Act

Whether it is necessary that a corporation must be established by a special Act for being covered under section 10(10A)(i) of the Income Tax Act under the "corporation established by a Central, State or provincial Act" or even if there is no special Act but a corporation incorporated under the Companies Act being control and managed absolutely by state government, is also covered under the aforesaid provision?

Parveen Kr. Aggarwal   26 November 2009 at 16:48

interpretation of section 10(10A)(i) of I.T. Act

Precisely which corporations are covered under section 10(10A)(i) of the Income Tax Act under the "corporation established by a Central, State or provincial Act"

raj123   26 November 2009 at 16:46

Is it advisable to give surety for my friend ?

My friend as applied for bail(dowry and harrasement case). He is asking myself and my brother for surety to him. I'm working in a S/W company and my brother is Govt. employee.

Is there any problem in future for us if we both give surety for my friend ?

Advice Need ! Please Help !