Anonymous
18 February 2010 at 09:37
Dear Expert Friends of the Forum,
This Question is pertaining to State of A P.
In the instant case, Will is not registered
but an executor is named. How to implement
this Will? Is probating is to be done (
Please note this is pertaining to State of
A P )? The property named in the instant
Will has come through some other Will
Which is not probated ( This Will is also
from State of A P).
Thanking you ALL in advance expecting an explicit reply please!
Anonymous
18 February 2010 at 08:12
Hi
My query is,marriage solemnised at Delhi in 2007. The boy and girl born and educated in Delhi and now the couple residing on leave and license basis in Mumbai. They want to register their marriage in Mumbai. Can they register in Mumbai? Any affidavit to be made?Does jurisdiction bar them to register their marriage in Mumbai?
shridhar
18 February 2010 at 08:11
Dear sir,
My grandfathers inherited property is in my elder brothers name since from 15 years back,he has done for availing loan to improve land , but we are living together now, Now he is telling he will not share the improved land, whether it is possible for me to take equal share in property or not.please reply what i can do now.
Thanking you.
Nagesh Kumar M
18 February 2010 at 08:08
Dear Sirs,
We are in need of assignments in Bangalore.
We Provide the single window solutions for the Business setup services in Bangalore & Karnataka for:
1. Shops & Commercial Establishment
2. Factories Act
3. Contract Labour
4. Pollution Control Board
5. VAT
6. Profession Tax
7. Service Tax
8. Income Tax
9. Customs
10. Central Excise
11. Import & Export code, Advance and EPCG Licencing
12. Weights & Measurements under PCRO
13. Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Licence
14. Drugs & Cosmetics Licence
15. 100% EOU
16. STPI
17. Provident Fund
18. ESIC….. etc
We are soliciting your support by availing our services.
Anonymous
18 February 2010 at 01:55
my younger sister was married in 2009,18 april. but my sisters husband sent her back to our parents home in august2009 by telling some falsy office reasons. & now in december 2009 we called him then he refused to accept my sister & did the complaint in police station at his place against my sister that she is not staying with him
now due to this fraud situation, can my sister file a case from our home town?
SATYANARAYANA K
17 February 2010 at 23:57
My client is complainant in 498 A of I.P.C case, now my client wanted to withdraw the case, presently the case is in Crime stage and police did not file charge sheet till now, due to her complaint her husband Central Govt Job lost, there is no income Department ordered as after closed the 498 a case then job will be reinstated, due to that reason, my client suffering as a humanity hence she wanted to withdraw the case against her husband immediately please suggest sir
My query is (1) if my client withdraw the case in crime stage is there any problem, (2)If after withdraw the case if husband again harass my client is there same value before the Police station (3) If harass my client May give complaint again u/s 498 a is it possible to accept the case by police. if there is any section to withdraw the case immediately please give with full details, waiting for your valuable replies, thanks to all experts
SATYANARAYANA K
17 February 2010 at 23:40
My client and his would be wife are Indian citizens, and they are planning to get their marriage solemnized and registered in Singapore/Australia.
They are paternal first cousins (my client fathers are full blood siblings.
My query is If that above marriage would be legal in India, if it is registered lawfully in Singapore/Australia or if there are any other formalities that needs to be performed in India waiting for your valuable suggestions
Anonymous
17 February 2010 at 23:39
We are facing many tormoil & turbulent days in judiciary proceedings.
In a suit one I.A. reserved for orders in the month of April, 2009 but till today there are no orders.
We cannot insist the Junior civil judge and we are asking bench clerk. He says please wait.
This is the position what to do ?
Clients don't want to listen the explanations. They want the result.
Today advocate's position is very bad.
I think this is what "KALYUG"
Plz. suggest accordingly.
Anonymous
17 February 2010 at 23:30
Sam co. and ABC co. together have
about 45% of the existing market share in operating systems in the Europe. Sam
co. developed X-Operations bundled with software applications in
Games and the ABC co. developed Y-Operations bundled with software
applications in Entertainment for use in the Personal Computers. In order to enhance
their market share, these companies entered into an agreement on 1.11.2008 to
exclusively share the ‘interoperable’ properties, so that the user of X-Operations
can transfer data to Y-Operations and vice versa.
The Antitrust Division of the Europe Department of Justice initiated civil proceedings on
10.12.2008 against the Sam co. and abc co.. for indulging in
anticompetition and monopolistic activities by bundling software applications in the
operating systems and then entering into an agreement for exclusive sharing of
interoperable properties.
The Sam co. and ABC co. decided to sell their products in India
through their partly owned subsidiaries TC ltd and DC ltd
respectively (as in both the subsidiaries 20 percent of the equity shares were held
by Indians). Advertisements appeared in the print and electronic media highlighting
the features of X-Operations and Y-Operations and their exclusive
“interoperable” compatibility.
Simultaneously, the Government of India received a report from its Embassy in Europe informing about the harmful effects of X-Operations and Y-Operations
on the Indian market. The existing market players in India also petitioned
the Government of India and submitted that these operating systems will have a
prejudicial effect on their market share. In view of this, the Government of India acted
quickly and promulgated an ordinance on 1.1.2009 which was replaced by
an Act of the Parliament viz. Prohibition of the Entry and Sales of X-Operations
and Y-Operations Act, 2009 banning the entry and sales including
licensing for a period of 2 years.
I just want to know….
1.Whether, the Parliament has competency to pass the Act of 2009?
2. whether, the above Act violates article 14,19 and 21 of constitution?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
bonus shares alongwith preferential allotment
I want to know if a comapny can make a preferential allotment and also issue bonus shares throught the same Eogm... and what procedure is to be followed in this matter