shammi kumar
19 February 2010 at 15:40
I HV FILED APPEAL BUT STIL APPEAL IS PENDING BUT DEPARTMENT SENT NOTICE FOR DEMAND U/S 221(1)EITHER I HAVE TO TAKE STAY FOR THIS DEMAND OR APPEAL IS SUFFICENT PLS GUIDE
Munish Kumar Garg
19 February 2010 at 15:36
Hello members
I need your help in some Land Acquisition matter. I want to know whether solatium @ 30% is payable on additional amount of 12% awarded under Sec. 23(1-A) of the Act. If so please provide me some citations of Supreme Court Latest one as I have already searched a lot but could not find any authority.
Thanks
MSC Shekar
19 February 2010 at 15:31
custodian
Definition
A term used by the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act for the person named to manage property left to a child under the terms of that Act. The custodian will manage the property if the gift giver dies before the child has reached the age specified by state law -- usually 21. When the child reaches the specified age, he will receive the property and the custodian will have no further role in its management.
The above definition is obtained from this website dictionary. Interestingly I find this citation in a Gift Deed in which "Permission of Custodian with some No." is mentioned.
My query is what is this Uniform Transfers to Minors Act as mentioned in this definition and where can I get a copy of the same? If the same is now changed / amended what is the new Act named?
Rekha.....
19 February 2010 at 15:23
Respected Sirs /Ma’am
Anybody can provide me the relevant citations that Defective vehicle does not require Expert Opinion or Certificate. The said Vehicle was cming from Bihar and damaged n repaired after that the said vehicle being used n could drive up to 440km.After 20 days the said vehicle was again in non working condition. We are Complainant in Consumer District Forum.
surya prakash
19 February 2010 at 14:32
Dear Friends,
I am looking for the following judgment and order dated 03/12/2007 in RP No.2635/2006
of The NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI) This pertains to Tata Motors Vs Lachia setty where Tata Motors was ordered to replace the defective car.
my e-mail add is surya1962@indiatimes.com and cs_prakash62@yahoo.com.
Thanking all of you
surya
surya prakash
19 February 2010 at 14:30
Dear Friends,
I am looking for the following judgment and order dated 03/12/2007 in RP No.2635/2006
of The NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI) This pertains to Tata Motors Vs Lachia setty where Tata Motors was ordered to replace the defective car.
Thanking all of you
surya
surya prakash
19 February 2010 at 14:26
Dear friends I am looking for the following judgement.
judgement and order dated 03/12/2007 in RP No.2635/2006
of The NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW
DELHI)
I request someone to e-mail this to me
at surya1962@indiatimes.com and/or cs_prakash62@yahoo.com
Thanking all of you
surya
Tipsy
19 February 2010 at 14:11
Bharat G. Parekh
404 Navjivan Bldg, 121/127 Kazi Syed St, Masjid(W),Mumbai.400 003
OFF : (022) 2345 3838/23463838 Fax : (022) 23453737 R :25114653
Email : impexsolution@vsnl.net M: 9820034262
REF : 11770237 Date :February 19, 2010
To
Axis Bank Limited
Janmabhomi Bhavan, 2nd Floor
Janmabhoomi Marg, Fort,
Mumbai 400 001.
SUB : Refund of IPO cheque
Dear Sir,
I applied for the the IPO of Jubilant Food works Limited on18/01/2010 with a cheque of INR 98600 (# 482146 dated 18.01.2010) for total 680 shares . I was alloted 205 number of shares worth rs. 29725 and the due amount of Rs. 68875 had to be credited in my bank account no. 5605686119. My application details are as follows :
1. Investor Name : Bharat Gunvantray Parekh
2 Application form no. 11770237
3. No of Securities Applied : 680 Shares
4. Client ID : 10583504
5. DP ID : IN 302236
6 DP Name : India Bulls Securities Ltd
7. Mode of Payment : Cheque bearing No 482146 Dated 18.01.10 Drawn of Citibank
8 Application deposied at : Enam securities Pvt ltd
Jubilant food works Ltd has issued us refund order No 115512dated 01/02/2010 for Rs 68875 bearing cheque No 015557 dated 01.02.2010 from Axis Bank Ltd , which was presented first time 0n/ 4/2/10 and returned on 5/2/10 With the remark “Wrongly delivered not drawn on us”
The cheuque was twice post that on the 9th and 13th Feb and the same has been reversed saying the cheque is already cleared.
Kindly let me know the status at an early date
Thanks and regards
Bharat Parekh
Original cheque in with Investor Bharat G Parekh
Anonymous
19 February 2010 at 12:29
I have taken working capital loan from Bank for say Rs.10 and one piece of land is given as security for which equitable mortgage was created and stamp duty is paid on Rs.10 . The limit is further enhanced to Rs.20 and stamp duty on balance loan of Rs.10 is paid. We have mutually agreed to give one more piece of land as additional security. My query is whether I have to pay stamp duty on entire amount of loan again for extension of Mortgage?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
nominee in case of co op society
Is the nominee of a flat in co-op society mere trustee to act on behalf of legal heirs or he is the sole owner, if the original owner who nominated him dies without a will?
Is this also true in case of bank fd and shares?