sanjeev saraswat
20 March 2010 at 21:26
a case in which
when a labour is died while he was on his duty of delevering gas cilender, traveling on a privare vechile hired by his employer i.e gas agency,
a pettition is file in m.a.c.t in which compensation is claim from vechile owner and insurance company of vehile and after 2 month a n another pettition filed in labour court in which compansation is claim from the employer and insurence company of employer.
both the pettition claimants are same but opp, respondence are different.
in first pettion respondence are 1. vehile owner 2. national insurance company
in 2nd in w.c.a respondence are 1.gas agency owner 2.orental insirance co.
insurance co. saying in labour court that only one pettition is maintainable, because of section 167 of m.v act
while i want to claim from both the parties
what will i do
bhanu pratap720
20 March 2010 at 20:51
case law on the point that all the witnesses (pw) should be first examined altogether in the chief examination and only then the cross examination should start.
Parthasarathi Loganathan
20 March 2010 at 20:35
It has now become a permanent practice that many service providers are marketing free SIM cards to lure the general public to become their customers in this competitive environment. Many overlook even obtaining bonafide identity of the subscribers. Later on this number is disclosed to many business people and time and again business SMS messages galore. This unfair practice is not controlled by any legislation. Government is yet to come forward to take any measures to address this issue. Let our eminent legal intellectuals join this debate and post their feedback to this issue.
Mr Sreejit
20 March 2010 at 20:28
THE SYNOPSIS: MY HOUSE IN KOLKATA IS BRUGLED THREE TIMES (26/08/2009, 30/08/2009 AND 27/11/2009). THREE FIR AND PAINSTAKING VISITS OF ALL HIGHER OFFICIALS IS THE CREDITS.
AS I HAD ALREADY GIVEN A PETITION OF INACTION OF POICE TO THE WB HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. I SHOOTD AN RTI ON WBHRC ON 03/03/2009 FOR WHICH THE REPLY I GOT IS THAT THEY AHD CONSTITUTED A BENCH OF A MEMBER OF WBHRC ON 04/11/2009 WHO GAVE A NOTICE TO THE DY. COMMISSIONER WITH 3 WEEKS TIME LIMIT. THIS COMMUNICATION TO MY WIFE AND THE REPLY REPLY ALSO HAD THE COPY OF THIS INTIMATION REACHED TO ME AND WIFE ON THE SAME DAY ON 18/03/2010 ALONG WITH MY RTI REPLY.
THIS FABRICATION OF FACTS IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE WBHRC HAD FAILED TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE PETITION DATED 23/09/2009 AND HUSSLED UP AND GAVE A FAULTY REPLY. NOW AS THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION WHOIS THE AUTHORITY OF RTI IN WEST BENGAL AND THE WBHRC ARE OFFICED IN THE SAM BUILDING AND SAME FLOOR, THE POSSIBILITY OF FURHTER FABRICATING AND GOING HAND IN HAND WITH THE STATE POLICE FORCE IS VISIBLE AND MORE VIABLE.
IF THE HRC WHO IS WESTED WITH SUO MOT POWER TO ORDER FOR CID/CBI INQUIRY, GOOF-UP LIKE THIS, WHERE WILL THE LAY ABIDING/TAX PAYING/TRUE CITIZEN GO FOR RESCUE.
I HUMBLY WISH TO MENTION IN THIS CONTEXT THAT MY WIFE'S FAMILY IS HAVING LINK WITH LEADER/STATESMEN LIKE THE FIRST PRESIDENT OF INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS, WOMESH. CHANDRA. BONNERJEE.
SATISH KUMAR
20 March 2010 at 20:20
Respected Sir,
I express my gratitude to you and the site for extending invaluable legal service to the needy people/litigants. We are three brothers and three sisters. My father died in 1996 and mother in 2006.My eldest sister filed suit for partition in 1999. The suit has now reached the stage of final decision. Today the ADJ asked me and the plaintiff's counsel to submit latest rulings on the point ..."how old cases are to be dealt with after the introduction of the HSA Amendment Act,2005 ?" That is - which law will be applicable i.e. the old one or the Amendment 2005?
Kindly suggest me some latest case laws on this point at your earliest convenience as the next date of hearing is 27-03-2010 and it will take me some time to cull it out from Law Library.
Reagrds,
Your's,
Satish Kumar
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 20:17
Dear,
I want to the Procedure to disown my son, Already i have read the topic in this website but as the reply was given through private message, i asking the query again.
One of the reply was to announce it publicaly. Only Public announcement is enough or there is any legal procedure like signing the paper and registering in the court.
you may ask, why i want to disown. The reason is my son dont want to live with his wife though we are trying to comparmise him. Now his wife brother's are treatening me to comparmise soon or else they will file dowry case. while going through this website, i found it best to disown instead of going behind bars and facing the police torture.
If any lawyer from chennai, please do reply so that i can discuss with you personally and protect me and my family.
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 19:41
i had filed a municipal appeal in the chief judge, small causes court at hyderabad. the stay order granted is not satisfactory for me. what are the options open to me? the next hearing is after 15 days. can i approach the high court now or should i do it after the final judgement?
Ansuman Subhankar
20 March 2010 at 18:12
Respected to all expert,
Suppose a person is planning to start a training institute.
What are the legal procedure required in starting the same?
what acts that he will be taking in account? The said person is stay in in Bhubaneswar,Orissa.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Remedy against Builder
What is the recourse available to the member of the Registered Society against the Builder who have collected society registration charges from each flat members but did not register the society and the members had to do it themselves. Also the builder has not executed the Conveyance Deed in the name of the Flat Owners which he is bound to do upon the registration of the society. Can I file a criminal complaint against the Builder for contravening the provisions of Sec. 10 & 11 of the Mah. Ownership of Flat Act? Can someone provide me with the sketch draft of such complaint urgently to be filed in the Court???