Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

K.Hemachandran   29 March 2010 at 18:45

Not registering FIR against my Complaint.

Landlord broke open my Shop & stole my all materials. I lodged Complaint at Police Station. Till the FIR not registered. Can I write to Magistrate & ask to order Police to take Lawful Action on my Complaint. Let me get some idea.

Thanks
KHChand

Praveen Kumar   29 March 2010 at 17:53

Repeated adjournments without reason in Consumer courts...

I have filed a case in a consumer court. The opposite party has filed a vakalat stating who is representing them. After that they are not even appearing in the court for any hearing and the judge too is just giving ajournments in one month periods. So far 5 such adjournments have been given. According to Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 and even a Supreme Court Order in the case of Civil Appeal No. 7975 of 2001, it has been clearly stated that the opposite party can have only a maximum of 45 days to file their version. In this case they are not even appearing, let alone asking for adjournments. What can be done by me to inform that court that they have to now decide on the case or take the next step?

Neeraj Kaushal   29 March 2010 at 17:49

about under order 39 rule 2 A C.P.C

Sir,
i have filed a civil suit for permanent injunction against the defendant , court granted ex-parte stay order to me and restrained the respondent from raising any sort of construction on joint land till next date of hearing , but wife and son of respondent is doing the construction work , main respondent is out of station , i have filed application under order 39 rule 2 A of C.P.C in civil court and i have made party in application only son and wife of respondent,not main respondent , my problem is that my application under order 39 rule 2 A of CPC is maintainable if maintainable, is there any law of supreme court or High court of India regarding this matter.

Anonymous   29 March 2010 at 17:46

Entitlement of pension

After the demise of mother (Father was retired from the post of superintendent in central excise department) an unmarried daughter (She was fully dependent on his parents only) is entitled to get the pension benefit or not. If he deserves benefit how she will approach.

Anonymous   29 March 2010 at 17:44

Agriculture land registered on my company's name

Hello,
i have a pvt ltd company and i am a farmer and i have bought agriculture land in maharashtra in 2006 and registered around 5 acres land on my company's name which is pvt ltd company. I just like to know whether my regt docments and conveyance that i did on my company's name is valid or not.

do i have to convert land as Non Agriculture NA to be valid land parcel in my company's name or i can convert the land as NA when i want to come up with residential project there.

Pl guide me.
thanks

Anonymous   29 March 2010 at 17:18

SALE AGREEMENT VALIDITY

is it true that after particular number of years a sale agreement looses its validity if not registered or proper payment made to the purchaser. if yes what is the time limit. kindly give details

Shailendra Sahasrabudhe   29 March 2010 at 17:16

Formation of Appartment / society

I took the possession of flat almost 5 years back, builder has not formed the society nor has formed the apartment.. he is simply delaying it. He has not even execuited the deed of declaration....Even the maintenance money is collected by builder in cash and no receipts are given... what legal action I can take against builder ?

Anonymous   29 March 2010 at 17:10

PLS HELP ASAP

PLEASE HELP..
My father purchased 5 pieces of land in the year 1972, this land was later sold to one developer mr A. an agreement was made in dec 1995, the consideration amnt wud be Rs. 691000/- the schedule of the payment was mentioned in the agreement. This schedule was not properly followed. In june 1997 my dad expired, my mother who is not so educated, I who was 17 and my sister who was 13 were the legal heirs. So in Sep 1997 this Mr. A takes us to his office, makes a supplement agreement in our names make me and my mother sign it. Mr. A made us sign the documents ther and there and also got a power of attorney from us, without giving us the time to see the documents. Only a payment of Rs 30000/- was made, thereafter inspite of several calls and personal visits to his office Mr. A never bothered to pay the remaining balance neither a copy of the supplement agreement was given to us wherein it was mentioned that Rs. 50000/- would be paid in 3 equal installments to us. So in may 2000 my mother sent him a notice that the agreement stands cancelled, but in sep 2000 Mr. A sends his agent and gives us Rs 10000/- and asks us to sign on a document which mentions that the agreement is not cancelled and we in future will be bound by the agreement. We hoping that still he will make payment and the matter will settle, gave him signatures. Now in 2008 no single payment came from him so my mother sold it to another developer Mr. B, who we thought knew abt the earlier sale, as he was brought to us by my maternal uncle who also holds the power of attorney to that place. The papers were signed and some payments were made. Mr. A sent some notice to Mr. B when paper notice was given abt the sale. But mr B went ahead. Now in 2008 mr. A has filed a case against us 3 and also asked us for a compensation of Rs. 5 crore along with the amount of Rs 5lacs which he has paid to us. Kindly help me know how strong we stand how much is the possibility of winning in such situations, and how should we proceed as now Mr. B has also been respondents in the case.

Vaibhav   29 March 2010 at 17:08

Second motion of mutual consent divorce

Hi,

If one of the parties is not appearing for the second motion of mutual consent divorce, can I put an application for summon of the other party in the court? Is there a citation or judgement regarding this?

thanks in advance

Anonymous   29 March 2010 at 16:21

deceased plaintiff

There are five plaintiffs in a suit. One of the plaintiffs has deceased. He has no heirs who are not already on record in the suit.

Is it necessary to delete his name from the record? If decree is passed in the suit after he is dead, but whilst he is still on record, what is the status of the decree?